1 / 55

The View From 10,000 Feet and From The Trenches In California – How Healthcare Reform Impacts You

The View From 10,000 Feet and From The Trenches In California – How Healthcare Reform Impacts You. January 29, 2014 Anaheim, California Sponsored by Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart P.C. Moderator: Jeffrey B. Compangano, Esq. Panelist(s): Timothy J. Stanton, Esq. #IHCC12.

elise
Download Presentation

The View From 10,000 Feet and From The Trenches In California – How Healthcare Reform Impacts You

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The View From 10,000 Feet and From The Trenches In California – How Healthcare Reform Impacts You January 29, 2014 Anaheim, California Sponsored by Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart P.C. Moderator: Jeffrey B. Compangano, Esq. Panelist(s): Timothy J. Stanton, Esq. #IHCC12

  2. Overview • Health Care Reform, 2014 and Beyond • Employer Mandate – our starting point • Exchanges and Related Issues • New IRS Reporting in 2015 • Waiting Periods • Continuing Legal Challenges

  3. Overview (cont.) • Other Hot Health Benefit Issues • Health FSA Carryovers – as soon as now • Same-sex Marriage – Impact of Windsor • New Wellness Opportunities, Challenges in 2014 • HIPAA reminder • Summary & Key Takeaways • Open Forum

  4. Shared Responsibility . . . . What Now?

  5. Sharing is Mandatory • Affordable Care Act adopted two mandates as part of its emphasis on “shared responsibility” • The individual mandate – secure “minimum essential coverage” or pay a fine; and • The employer mandate – provide “minimum essential coverage” that is affordable and that offers minimum value or pay a fine • Individual mandate effective January 1, 2014 (or maybe March 31, 2014?) • Employer mandate effective (for now) January 1, 2015

  6. Individual Mandate • Beginning January 1, 2014March 31, 2014, all (most) individuals are required to have enrolled in “minimum essential coverage” each month or they will owe a “shared responsibility payment” • Why? • Encourage individual responsibility • Stabilize health insurance pools after ACA market reforms take effect • Guaranteed issue • Preexisting conditions • Underwriting rules

  7. Individual Mandate (cont.) • Who’s covered? • All taxpayers (with some exceptions – religious, “stealth immigrants,” incarcerated, low income, hardship) • One short gap (> 3 months) each year is permitted • Coverage for one day = coverage for a month • What’s required? • Maintain MEC each month for taxpayer and federal tax dependents • What is MEC? • Employer plans (incl. COBRA), individual insurance, government programs (Medicare, etc.)

  8. Individual Mandate (cont.) • Penalty equal to greater of— • 2014: $95 per adult/$47.50 per child (max of $285/family) or 1% of household income • 2015: $325 per adult/$162.50 per child (max of $975/family) of 2% of household income • 2016: $695 per adult/$347.50 per child (max of $2,085/family) of 2.5% of household income • Penalty collected through individual income tax returns • No penalty for nonpayment but IRS will withhold from future refunds

  9. Employer Mandate • Applicable large employers must offer minimum essential coverage that is both affordable and that provides minimum value to substantially all of their full-time employees and dependents • If an ALE does not offer such coverage and if one or more FT employee becomes eligible for a premium tax credit, an assessable payment will be due

  10. Employer Mandate: Key Concepts and Issues

  11. Who’s Covered? • The employer mandate applies to Applicable Large Employers • ALE = 50+ FTEs on average during the preceding calendar year • Tip: ALE status for 2015 is based on 2014 data • Key considerations— • Who’s the “Employer”? • Who’s the “Employee”?

  12. Who’s Who? • Who’s the “Employer”? • For most benefit plan purposes, business entities that are related by common ownership are treated as if they are a single entity • Who’s an “Employee”? • Yes: W-2 employees (including temporary, seasonal, intern, commission-based, per diem/piece work, misclassified) • No: “Leased employees”, Sole proprietors, partners and 2-percent S corp. shareholders • Maybe so: non-414(n)(2) leased employees, staffing company workers, PEO workers

  13. Coping with ALE Status

  14. Who’s Who Under the Mandate? • FT status is key driver under the Mandate • Note: FT status for ALE determination ≠ FT status under Employer Mandate • Note also: FTEs are not relevant here • There are essentially three (3) types of employees for purposes of the mandate: • Variable hour - test • Seasonal - test • Everyone else – offer coverage • Accurate identification of FT employees is critical to managing exposure

  15. An Employee in Full • FT status = reasonably expected to work 30 hours/week or 130 hours/month • IRS approach allows designation of a look-back to measure working hours • Assess hours of service on a monthly and ongoing basis • Hourly – count hours • Non-Hourly – use approved “equivalencies” • Actual hours of service • Use a days-worked equivalency of 8 hours / day • Weeks-worked equivalency of 40 hours / week • Equivalencies can’t be used if they substantially understate work hours and result in non-FT status

  16. General Rules – Variable Hour/Seasonal Employees • For ongoing employees (Standard Periods) • Measurement Period: 3-12 consecutive months • Stability Period: Same as measurement period, but at least 6 mos. • Admin Period: Up to 90 days • For new employees (Initial Periods) • Measurement Period: 3-12 consecutive months • Stability Period: 6 months or standard measurement period length • Admin Period: From end of initial measurement period until last day of the next month thereafter (no more than 60 days)

  17. Seasonal Employees • Different from “seasonal worker” used for determining ALE status • Through 2014, use “reasonable, good faith” interpretation • Employment must (arguably) be tied to a “season” • Period of employment must be limited – 6, 7, or 9 months? • After 2014, anticipate a time limit such as six (6) months during the year • Actual working hours not taken into consideration

  18. Responses to Employer Mandate

  19. Points to Ponder • Business reorganization • Schedule management • Terminate coverage • New tiers of coverage • Intelligent implementation • Focus on the lower end of the wage scale • “Magic” solutions

  20. Business Reorganization • Try to break up the controlled group to avoid coverage as ALEs? • May be appropriate with some business structures • But: loss of control would accompany group break-up • Probably still need to assess CG status if you don’t know • Affects other benefit plans

  21. Schedule Management • Many employers considering reduction of working hours below 30 and restructuring of many positions to “part-time” to reduce exposure to Employer Mandate • Concerns: • ERISA Section 510 – interference with right to coverage? • Title VII – Adverse impact? • Nondiscrimination?

  22. Schedule Management (cont.) • Reducing hours below 30 for those who already have coverage (i.e., a take-away)? • Reducing hours below 30 for those who reasonably expect to have coverage in 2014 based on historical work schedule? • Eliminating full-time position and replacing it with two part-time positions? • Where are the qualified PT employees going to come from?

  23. ERISA Section 510 • Precludes affecting the employer-employee relationship to the employee’s detriment if motive is to interfere with attainment of a right or benefit under ERISA or an ERISA plan • Federal cause of action, make whole relief and back pay available, plus attorneys fees • Claims available to plan participants and those with an expectation of coverage

  24. Title VII • Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin • Other federal and state laws expand the scope of coverage to include pregnancy, disability, etc. • Extends to terms and conditions of employment, including employee benefits • Concern lies in impact of changes to plan eligibility on protected classes • Schedule management could disproportionately burden employees in protected classes

  25. Nondiscrimination Rules • ACA adopted nondiscrimination rule “similar to” Section 105(h), effective January 1, 2011 for non-GF plans under PHSA 2716 • But not excepted benefits or retiree-only plans • IRS guidance in 2010 • Unclear • Sought further comments • Penalties different than under Section 105(h) • Enforcement suspended until further notice

  26. Terminate Your Plan • Consider the cost of paying the “big” penalty relative to the cost of compliance • Employees go to the exchange • Buy coverage after tax • Reduce your health care cost • Pay non-deductible penalty • Payment to make employees whole? • Third-party alternatives?

  27. New Tiers of Coverage • Adopt new tiers of coverage? • May work but new (and old) nondiscrimination rules may frustrate attempts to offer “bare bones” coverage to lower-level employees • Can adversely impact employees in concert with Individual Mandate • Remember “soft” costs of creating a coverage class system • “Skinny” plan – MEC but not MV • Doesn’t automatically block access to tax credits • Watch for nondiscrimination rules • Change to MV affordable plan in 2015 will box out employees who got tax credit in 2014

  28. Intelligent Implementation • Analyze the workforce and take full advantage of the rules • Determine who works 30/130 hours in any month – summer, project, temporary, holiday help? • Use 5% margin effectively • Impose 90-day waiting period • Use maximum measurement and stability periods for variable hour and seasonal employees

  29. Intelligent Implementation (cont.) • Application for exchange coverage with a tax credit requires lack of affordable MV employer coverage • Exchanges will verify with employer • Avoid wrong answers to exchanges – could deprive employee of valuable subsidies • Don’t take action against employee after contact from exchange or risk retaliation claim

  30. Targeting the PTC-Eligibles • Focus on ≤ 400% FPL, particularly ≤ 250% • Offer one low cost coverage option • Communicate cost of Exchange coverage • Loss of tax-exempt employer contributions • Loss of pre-tax employee contributions • Communicate value of Employer Coverage • Consider replacing vacant positions in this group with part-time workers

  31. On Being An Informed Consumer • Expect to encounter many promoters of ACA-related products and solutions • Reimbursement-based “solutions” • Stand-alone HRAs – dead • Excepted benefits – not workable • Self-funding? • Availability of affordable stop-loss coverage? • Be aware of new administrative burdens • Be skeptical of “magic” solutions to the ACA

  32. Marketplace Issues

  33. Health Insurance Marketplaces – aka “Exchanges” • Federally supervised, but state-based, marketplaces for “qualified” insurance plans • Initially designed to let individuals, small employers shop more easily on basis of price, quality • States can open them up to employers with 100 or more employees – in 2017 • Disastrous initial rollout, likely technical fixes – lasting harm?

  34. Your Interaction with Exchanges? • Exchanges likely to seek information from employers to verify premium tax credit eligibility – could start in 2013 • If Exchange determines an employee is full-time and eligible for premium tax credit, employer gets chance to appeal • Incentive for employers – avoid later tax penalties (separate IRS appeal regime) • What is your process for responding to notices and handling appeals?

  35. Exchange Interactions (cont.) • Employer can contest finding of PTC eligibility but no access to information submitted by individual • If eligibility reversed, individual (and family members) get a re-appeal right • Possibility of conflicting determinations for multi-state employers • Possibility of conflict with IRS determination regarding assessable payments • Allow special enrollment in employer plan if tax credit denied?

  36. Exchange Notice Issues • Employers subject to the FLSA required to provide notice regarding availability of exchange coverage • Prescribed content – use model notice but customize • Is MEC available? • Does plan offer minimum value? • Is coverage affordable? • Distribute by October 1, 2013 or within 14 days of hire • Electronic notices – not as easy as it could be

  37. Notice Issues (cont.) • Model DOL COBRA notices updated: • Remove obsolete language • Provide info about exchanges as alternative • Content requirements for summaries of benefits and coverage (SBC) updated: • Is coverage affordable? • Does coverage offer minimum value? • Key: What is the message to employees?

  38. Private Exchanges • Platform for employer to pay and let employee select from a range of products • Active or pre-Medicare retirees, multi- or single-insurer • Employer may step into secondary role in design & administration • Players include: AonHewitt, Mercer, Gallagher, Towers Watson/Extend Health

  39. New Tax Reporting Requirements

  40. New Reporting Obligation #1 • Code Section 6055 – Minimum Essential Coverage – Due for 2015 • Used to enforce Individual Mandate and establish eligibility for tax credits • Includes detailed info about each employee and related enrollees • Proposed regs eliminate some detail and require reporting by months (vs. days) of coverage

  41. Who Must Report? • Fully-insured plan (any size): carrier • Self-funded plan (any size): employer • Each member of a controlled group has a reporting obligation • Can nominate a single filer but cannot outsource liability • Vendor can file for the employer • For multiemployer plans, plan reports • Issue for foreign employers? • No FEIN

  42. New Reporting Obligation #2 • Code Section 6056 – ALE Reporting – Due for 2015 • Used to enforce Employer Mandate and inform individuals • Only applies to “Applicable Large Employers” • 50 or more FTEs on average during business days in the prior year • No 6056 reporting for health insurance issuers or non-ALEs

  43. What is Reported? • Includes detailed information required • Somewhat simplified by proposed regulations • Certifications— • Was MEC made available to FT employees and dependents? • Was coverage “minimum value”? • Headcount by month • Name/address/TIN for each FT employee • Months of coverage for FT employees

  44. Who Must Report? • Each ALE must report, even if a member of controlled group • Can nominate a single filer but cannot outsource liability • Vendor can file for the employer • For MEPs— • Two reports: eligible FT employees and ineligible FT employees • MEP administrator can report globally, but liability remains with participating employers

  45. Individual Statements • Provide in conjunction with forms submitted to IRS • Specified content tracking Forms 1095-B and 1095-C • Provide to primary enrollee (6055) or each FT employee (6056) • Paper notices are permitted • Electronic distribution requires consent

  46. Reporting Process • 6055 – Form 1095-B • 6056 – Form 1095-C • Both reports due by 2/28 (3/31 for electronic) • Electronic filing required for large filers • Individual statements due by 1/31 • No special timing allowance for FY plans

  47. Consequences? • Same penalties as for information returns generally • $100 per return/statement; $1.5 million annual cap • Applies to report and statement • Reasonable cause exception for both • Reductions possible for quick fixes • IRS may review 6056 reports for accuracy

  48. Reporting Recap • Not required to do anything in 2014 • Exchange notices for 2014 are informational only • 6055/6056 reporting goes live January 1, 2015 • But: well advised to use 2014 as a time to develop and test reporting process to capture required information • Exchange notices for 2014 will give a hint about exposure for 2015 • Use that data for planning a response to the Employer Mandate

  49. ACA Plan Compliance Issues for 2014

  50. Waiting Periods • Beginning January 1, 2014, the maximum permissible eligibility waiting period for health plans will be 90 days (not three months!) • Calendar days, not business days • Entry must occur by 90th day to comply • Note that some states (e.g., CA – 60 days) may impose shorter waiting periods for insured plans • Keep waiting period in mind in 2015 for dealing with temps and turnover

More Related