1 / 13

Evaluation of exo N1 data

Evaluation of exo N1 data. M.Ollivier - L Jorda. Goal of the evaluation. Check if N1 data are compliant with N1 specifications Global noise not larger than 1.5 times the photon noise for a K0 star of mag 14 (photon noise = 700 ppm over 512 seconds, 250 ppm over 1hour).

elisa
Download Presentation

Evaluation of exo N1 data

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Evaluation of exo N1 data M.Ollivier - L Jorda 25th CoRoT Scientific Council : 24-25 sept 2007 - M.O. - L.J.

  2. Goal of the evaluation • Check if N1 data are compliant with N1 specifications • Global noise not larger than 1.5 times the photon noise for a K0 star of mag 14 (photon noise = 700 ppm over 512 seconds, 250 ppm over 1hour) 25th CoRoT Scientific Council : 24-25 sept 2007 - M.O. - L.J.

  3. Conclusion of first evaluation (june 2007) • White photometry • Pb with outliers (SAA) • Pb with hot pixels, particularly when present in a background window • When outliers are flagged and kept away, specification is reached whatever the magnitude is • Colored photometry • Drift (red : positive slope, green and blue : negative slope) • As a consequence, specification in term of stability is not reached (even if OK fter slope correction). Conclusion : not far from N1 requirements 25th CoRoT Scientific Council : 24-25 sept 2007 - M.O. - L.J.

  4. What has changed in the pipeline ? • Optimisation of parameters for cosmics detection • Flag of the SAA input / output (not implemented in tested data) • How to correct hot pixels (cf. VL and MA presentations) 25th CoRoT Scientific Council : 24-25 sept 2007 - M.O. - L.J.

  5. Method • Starting from N1 data (LRc01 in this case, IR01 in previous evaluation) • Use of unflagged data only • 512 second sampling • Removal of low frequencies (substraction of a fit over 16 samples) • Removal of outliers (only unflagged points) • Evaluation of mean and variance of residuals 25th CoRoT Scientific Council : 24-25 sept 2007 - M.O. - L.J.

  6. White photometry 25th CoRoT Scientific Council : 24-25 sept 2007 - M.O. - L.J.

  7. White photometry (2) • Very few outliers that have not been detected and flagged • The hot pixels are very present and really need to be treated. 25th CoRoT Scientific Council : 24-25 sept 2007 - M.O. - L.J.

  8. Colored photometry • Real pb of color correction in quite all LRc01 LCs. 25th CoRoT Scientific Council : 24-25 sept 2007 - M.O. - L.J.

  9. Colored photometry (2) 25th CoRoT Scientific Council : 24-25 sept 2007 - M.O. - L.J.

  10. Colored photometry (3) • Intra color correction not optimized • Pb of drift not corrected • S/N requirement not compliant with the specification Colored photometry processing must be improved (by the project or by users ?) 25th CoRoT Scientific Council : 24-25 sept 2007 - M.O. - L.J.

  11. Conclusions • White photometry is OK (from S/N requirement point of view) • A processing for of hot pixels should be implemented • Colored photometry is still not at the required level. 25th CoRoT Scientific Council : 24-25 sept 2007 - M.O. - L.J.

  12. “nice” LCs 25th CoRoT Scientific Council : 24-25 sept 2007 - M.O. - L.J.

  13. “nice” LCs 25th CoRoT Scientific Council : 24-25 sept 2007 - M.O. - L.J.

More Related