1 / 9

Community Advisory Board West Van Buren WQARF Site WVB Working Group - Draft Final Feasibility Study Work Plan

Community Advisory Board West Van Buren WQARF Site WVB Working Group - Draft Final Feasibility Study Work Plan. April 15, 2013. Haley & Aldrich, Inc. TOPICS. West Van Buren Working Group Feasibility Study Objectives Feasibility Study Process WQARF Procedure

eliot
Download Presentation

Community Advisory Board West Van Buren WQARF Site WVB Working Group - Draft Final Feasibility Study Work Plan

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Community Advisory Board West Van Buren WQARF Site WVB Working Group - Draft Final Feasibility Study Work Plan April 15, 2013 Haley & Aldrich, Inc.

  2. TOPICS West Van Buren Working Group Feasibility Study Objectives Feasibility Study Process WQARF Procedure Draft Final Feasibility Study Work Plan Status Public Notice

  3. WEST VAN BUREN WORKING GROUP Unincorporated association of parties that are key regional stakeholders; • Air Liquide Specialty Gases, LP; • Arizona Public Service Company; • City of Phoenix; • Dolphin, Inc.; • Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.; • Penn Racquet Sports; • Holsum Bakery, Inc.; • Honeywell International, Inc.; • ITT Corporation; • Laundry and Cleaners Supply, Inc.; • Maricopa Land and Cattle Company; • Milum Textile Services Co.; • Prudential Overall Supply, Inc.; • Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District; • Shuff Steel Company; • Univar USA Inc.

  4. FS OBJECTIVES Identify a Reference Remedy, and a Less Aggressive and More Aggressive Remedy that: • Appear to be capable of achieving the Remedial Objectives; • Comply with Arizona Revised Statutes § 49-282.06, Remedial Action Criteria; and • Comply with Arizona Administrative Code, Title 18 - Environmental Quality, Chapter 16 – Department of Environmental Quality Water Quality Assurance Revolving Fund Program, Article 4 – Remedy Selection.

  5. FS PROCESS Remedial Strategies [R18-16-407(F)] [R18-16-407(G)] Potential Alternatives [R18-16-407(H)(1-2)] [R18-16-407(E)(3)] Plume Remediation Containment Controlled Migration Source Control More Aggressive Reference Less Aggressive Monitoring No Action Comparison Criteria [R18-16-407 (H)(3)] Proposed Remedy

  6. WQARF PROCEDURE FS Working Agreement with ADEQ – 01/15/13 Proposed Remedial Action Plan (typically developed by ADEQ) Draft Final FS Work Plan – 03/01/13 Public Comment Period (30 Days – Started 04/05/13) Public Comment Period Responsiveness Summary and Record of Decision (ADEQ) Final FS Work Plan Approval Feasibility Study

  7. DRAFT FINAL FS WORK PLAN STATUS • Draft FS Work Plan – submitted to ADEQ in September 2011; • FS Working Agreement with ADEQ – January 15, 2013; • ADEQ Comments Received – February 1, 2013; • Draft Final FS Work Plan – submitted to ADEQ on March 1, 2013; • FS Work Plan 30-Day Public Comment Period – April 5 to May 6, 2013.

  8. PUBLIC NOTICE – DATED APRIL 5, 2013 Provides information on how to: • Obtain a copy of the Draft Final FS Work Plan; • Provide comments to ADEQ.

  9. DRAFT FS REPORT STATUS Questions?

More Related