1 / 32

Ri 趙基安 Supervisor VS 葉育彰

Gastrointestinal motility and prokinetics in the critically ill Current Opinion in Critical Care 2007, 13:187 – 194. Ri 趙基安 Supervisor VS 葉育彰. Introduction. Early enteral administration of nutrition is currently considered to be best practice

eliora
Download Presentation

Ri 趙基安 Supervisor VS 葉育彰

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Gastrointestinal motility and prokinetics in the critically illCurrent Opinion in Critical Care 2007, 13:187–194 Ri趙基安 Supervisor VS葉育彰

  2. Introduction • Early enteral administration of nutrition is currently considered to be best practice • 50~60% of critically ill patients have delayed gastric emptying • The aetiologies of abnormal UGI motor activity remain unclear; related: pre-existing comorbidities, admission diagnoses, drugs, electrolyte abnormalities including hyperglycaemia, recent surgery, shock, and circulating cytokines

  3. Sequelae of abnormal UGI motility: ☆ poor nutrition ☆ bacterial colonization of the gastrointestinal tract ☆ gastro-esophageal reflux ☆ esophagitis ☆ gastrointestinal bleeding ☆ pulmonary aspiration ☆ ventilator-associated pneumonia

  4. Current treatment for abnormal UGI motility has major limitations • Better understanding  target therapy new agents

  5. Upper gastrointestinal motility in health • Lower esophageal sphincter tone prevents reflux of food, acid and bile • Proximal stomach functions as a reservoir and an important determinant of liquid gastric emptying; nutrient redistribution • Antro-pyloro-duodenal motility: Contractions can be localized or propagated (antegrade or retrograde)

  6. Chyme into the duodenum  nutrient receptor feedback  fundal relaxation, decrease in fundic and antral contractions, increased pyloric activity  slow gastric emptying • Fasting motility consists of migratory motor complexes, which are divided into 3 phases: ☆Phase I: quiescence ☆Phase II: variable period of irregular contractile activity ☆Phase III: short period (5~10 min) of intense, frequent, regular contractions (motilin receptor) clear bowel

  7. Gastrointestinal motility control: mixture of neural and humoral mechanisms • Interstitial cell of Cajal  fluctuated RMP  rhythm of smooth muscle activity • Neural and humoral mechanisms  to or not to initiate a mechanical contraction • Intrinsic: myenteric plexus • Extrinsic: parasympathetic↑; sympathetic↓ • CCK, released in response to nutrients  slow gastric emptying

  8. Gastric emptying in the critically ill • Delayed gastric emptying occurs frequently in critical illness • Gastric residual volumes  surrogate marker to determine the success or failure of nasogastric nutrition, and the risk of regurgitation and aspiration • The incidence of delayed gastric emptying in the critically ill appears to be affected by age, illness severity, and admission diagnosis

  9. Delayed gastric emptying is more frequent in: ☆Burns ☆multiple trauma (with and without head injury) ☆severe sepsis ►80% head injuries (IICP associated) ►Hyperglycemia delays gastric emptying (pre- existing DM doesn’t affect)

  10. Drugs administered in ICU, particularly inotropes and those used for sedation, may impact on gastrointestinal motility • Opiates μreceptors  may contribute to abnormal upper gastrointestinal motor function • Neuromuscular blockers  no effect

  11. High levels of circulating catecholamines commonly seen  negative effect • Adrenaline reduces gastric emptying by a β-adrenergic effect • Dopamine reduces antral contractions and slows orocaecal transit • High-dose catecholamines may reduce the prokinetic effect of erythromycin • Anticholinergics and calcium channel blockers

  12. Upper gastrointestinal motility abnormalities in the critically ill

  13. Esophageal dysmotility • Reflux oesophagitis occurs in approximately 50% of patients  hemorrhage, microaspiration  ventilator-associated pneumonia. • Lower esophageal sphincter tone is reduced or absent in mechanically ventilated patients  free oral flow of gastric contents

  14. Gastric dysmotility • Motor disturbances have been described in all regions of the stomach. ★Proximal stomach • Fundic wave frequency is reduced • Subsequent recovery of nutrient-induced relaxation to baseline is markedly delayed

  15. ★Whole stomach • Intragastric meal distribution is abnormal • Proximal gastric meal retention  GE reflux ★Distal stomach • Antral motor activity is greatly reduced • Pyloric activity is increased • Exaggeration in response to the presence of nutrients in the duodenum

  16. Duodenal dysmotility • Frequency of duodenal contractions is relatively well • Organization of duodenal activity is abnormal • 50% of these contractions are retrograde in critically ill

  17. Control mechanisms • During fasting, ghrelin and peptide YY (PYY) concentrations are abnormal • Nutrient-stimulated concentrations of cholecystokinin and PYY are markedly elevated  delayed gastric emptying

  18. Intestinal absorption • Glucose absorption is substantially reduced in the critically ill • Fat absorption may also be reduced • The reasons for impaired absorption are unclear

  19. Therapeutic options

  20. Cisapride • 5-HT4 agonist  Acetylcholine increase in enteric nervous system (parasympathomimetic)  increase esophageal sphincter tone and gastric emptying • Limited use due to enteral formulation and the risk of cardiac arrhythmias

  21. Metoclopramide • Widely used in ICU • Antagonizes the inhibitory effect of dopamine on motility; weak 5-HT3 antagonist • Less effective than erythromycin • With repeated administration tachyphylaxis develops • Ineffective and contraindicated in patients with head injuries

  22. Erythromycin • Low doses (1~3 mg/kg IV) of erythromycin act as a motilin agonist, triggering phase 3-like activity in the stomach and small intestine • In critically ill, itincreases antral motility, accelerates gastric emptying and improves the success of feeding • Efficacy reduced after 7-day use • Cardiac toxicity (use low dose:70 vs 200mg) and bacterial resistance

  23. Combination therapy • Combination of erythromycin and metoclopramide for failure of nasogastric feeding, both as first-line treatment and after the failure of monotherapy, is superior to either drug alone and with less tachyphylaxis

  24. Novel drug therapies

  25. 5-HT4 receptor agonists • Activation of the 5-HT4 receptor is important in the initiation of peristalsis ☆Tegaserod • A selective, 5-HT4 receptor partial agonist • Improve gastric hypomotility in a small number of critically ill patients • Ischemic colitis?

  26. μreceptor antagonists • Opiates slow gastric emptying  opiate antagonist ☆Naloxone • administered directly into the gut  avoid antagonism of the central effects of parenteral opiates • improves the success of feeding and reduces ventilator-associated pneumonia

  27. ☆Alvimopan • High affinity for μreceptors • Does not cross the blood–brain barrier • No effect on gastric emptying • hastened gut recovery and shortened time to hospital discharge in patients after bowel resection or hysterectomy

  28. Cholecystokinin receptor antagonists • Elevated cholecystokinin levels slow gastric emptying and motility and are associated with feed intolerance in critically ill patients ☆Dexloxiglumide • Selective and highly potent CCK-1 receptor antagonist • Inhibits gallbladder contraction, • Improves lower oesophageal sphincter function, • Hastens colonic transit. • Potential treatment

  29. Postpyloric feeding • As small intestinal motor function appears to be relatively preserved, successful feeding may be achieved with postpyloric feeding tubes • Blind placement  often failure • Radiological or endoscopic support are required • Postpyloric tubes v.s. intravenous erythromycin  failed nasogastric feeding and unresponsive to prokinetics

  30. Conclusion • New insights into the pathophysiology underlying failed enteral feeding • Commonly used prokinetics have limited efficacy • New agents are yet to undergo systematic clinical evaluation in the critically ill • Real time localization of the path of the tube • Use of frictional nasal jejunal feeding tubes

More Related