review of dynamic aperture studies
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Review of dynamic aperture studies

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 21

Review of dynamic aperture studies - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 122 Views
  • Uploaded on

Review of dynamic aperture studies. Yiton Yan SLAC. Dynamic aperture (DA) studies. tracking Default method: symplectic element by element tracking – however, attention will be more on nonlinear maps. Taylor-map tracking – accurate, but not exactly symplectic

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Review of dynamic aperture studies' - elinor


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
dynamic aperture da studies
Dynamic aperture (DA) studies
  • tracking
  • Default method: symplecticelement by element tracking – however, attention will be more on nonlinear maps.
  • Taylor-map tracking – accurate, but not exactly symplectic
  • Generating-type mixed-variable map tracking – implicit procedure, accurate, symplectic, but with singularities.
  • Irwin factorization
  • Integrable polynomial
  • Resonance basis map and nPB tracking
  • Optimization of dynamic aperture – parameterized Lie map for Resonance basis map vs. direct DA optimization (which uses GA).
ssc collider ring
SSC collider ring
  • Largest ring for DA study.
  • Highly nonlinear
  • small DA
  • small interest region
  • fast convergence
  • Accurate one-turn Taylor map
direct 12 th order and 11 th order taylor map tracking
Direct 12th-order and 11th-order Taylor map tracking
  • Compare the 11th-order with the 12th –order Taylor map tracking
  • Not exactly symplectic, seems OK with this much turn?
directly 12 th order taylor map tracking
Directly 12th-order Taylor map tracking
  • Compared with element-by-element tracking
  • 5 cm dipole
slide6

SSC 4-cm dipole case

  • 1 million turn
  • 11th-order Taylor map
  • Seems OK.
slide7

But 10th-order Taylor map tracking shows biased artificial diffusion due to not syplectic.

  • But is it accurate?
lie transformation
Lie transformation

Dragt-Finn factorization

Can be trasnferred back to Taylor map with one-order (or more orders) higher

slide9

The 10th-order Taylor map is re-expanded to the 11th-order Taylor map and works!

  • Degree of

accuracy

symplecticity

mixed variable map and generating function
Mixed variable map and Generating function
  • It is a mixed variable Vps obtained through, implicitly, generating function, but no need to get the generating function.
  • It retains the same accuracy compared to the same-order Taylor
  • It is symplectic at any truncated order
  • Tracking time is about twice of the same-order Taylor map tracking, but of course much faster compared to several orders higher Taylor map.
  • But with singularities - OK.
irwin kick factorization
Irwin (Kick) Factorization
  • A map is completely reconstructed into a minimum number of kick maps such with an order by order accuracy while push the errors to higher order.

Very elegant idea. Very fast. However, Spurious terms present unknown accuracy concern

explicit integrable polynomial
Explicit integrable polynomial

where

Symplectic integrator is then used for separating the integrable polynomials.

Lower homogeneous order terms uses higher order symplectic integrator while higher homogenous order terms uses lower order symplecticintegrator or even just separate them.

Computation time is slower than minimized-term Irwin factorization. However, it is more naturally close to the original Lie map and therefore generally less concerns about accuracy.

use of symplectic integrator for separation of homgeneous integrable polynomial
Use of symplectic integrator for separation of homgeneousintegrable polynomial
resonance basis map and npb tracking for pep ii her and ler dynamics aperture stuides
Resonance basis map and nPB tracking for PEP-II HER and LER dynamics aperture stuides
  • Taylor map can be trasnformed into a Deprit-type Lie map and then further transformed into the following resonance-basis map

This is a goal-moving soccer game

npb tracking
nPB tracking

nPB converge very fast.

Not exactly symplectic.

OK for PEP-II HER and LER tracking

1000 turns are needed for PEP-II due to damping

pep ii swamp plot
PEP II Swamp plot
  • See resonances
  • Easier to choose an working tune
slide21

Normalized tune shift and resonance driving terms

  • They are analytical
  • Can this be used for indirect dynamic aperture optimization

otherwise the direct dynamic aperture optimization is not analytical and so must use GA which usually take longer time.

All done. Thanks.

ad