1 / 30

Policy Directions for Career and Technical Education

Policy Directions for Career and Technical Education. Hans K. Meeder, Deputy Assistant Secretary Office of Vocational and Adult Education United States Department of Education October 2003 . Topics for Discussion . Economic Change Education Challenges Key Policy Objectives .

elina
Download Presentation

Policy Directions for Career and Technical Education

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Policy Directions forCareer and Technical Education Hans K. Meeder, Deputy Assistant Secretary Office of Vocational and Adult Education United States Department of Education October 2003

  2. Topics for Discussion • Economic Change • Education Challenges • Key Policy Objectives

  3. Fastest Growing Jobs Require Some Education Beyond High School

  4. High Learning = High Earning S A L A R Y

  5. U.S. Workforce Skill Level Changes Unskilled15% Skilled20% Skilled65% Unskilled60% Professional 20% Professional 20% 1950 1997 National Summit on 21st Century Skills for 21st Century Jobs

  6. 1,000 respondents placed high value on Verbal & written communications Math Computer expertise Interpersonal skills Only one-third satisfied with pool of available applicants Small Businesses Seek 20th CenturySkills for 21st Century Workforce Second national “Voice from the Street” survey conducted for American Express Small Business Services

  7. Changing Times “…many companies are firing and hiring at the same time, dumping outmoded or redundant employees and adding new ones with very different skills. Allstate Corp. is doing it. Pricewaterhouse-Coopers LLP is doing it. So are BellSouth Corp., Adobe Systems Inc. and a mess of others.” – The Wall Street Journal March 13, 2000

  8. Educational Need for Change • High schools have not changed enough – “soft bigotry of low expectations.” • Disconnect between student aspirations and actual high school preparation. • High rates of college remediation needed • High rates of college “drift out” • High schools do not pair college prep and career awareness/training for students.

  9. Reading performance of 17-year-olds Source: NCES. NAEP 1999, Trends in Academic Performance: Three Decades of Student Performance, p. 9.

  10. College “drift-out” ratesStudents not returning for year 2 Source: Mortensen, T. (November 1999), Postsecondary Opportunity as presented by The Education Trust.

  11. Educational Need for Change • Research consistently shows that rigorous academic course-taking increases student achievement, particularly for students most at risk of school failure.

  12. Advanced Math & Science Increases At-Risk Students’ Postsecondary Enrollment At-Risk Students Enrolling in Post-secondary Source: NCES, The Condition of Education, p. 51.

  13. The Prep to Performance Link • The strongest predictor of college completion is a rigorous and challenging high school course of study. • Most significantly, the higher the level of mathematics completed in secondary school, the stronger the continuing influence on bachelor’s degree completion. • Completion of two experimental (lab) science courses is the second most significant factor in determining whether or not students will complete college. Answers in the Tool Box by Clifford Adelman, June 1999

  14. Disconnect Between Student Aspirations and High School Preparation Students Source: NCES, The Condition of Education, 2000, p. 151.

  15. Educational Need for Change • In many cases, vocational education has not demonstrated a clear impact on: • Academic achievement • High school completion • Postsecondary transitions • But, integrated courses of study with technical AND academic classes do show positive results for student performance

  16. Academic Achievement For Students Taking Different Courses of Study Source: NCES, Trends in High School Vocational/Technical Coursetaking: 1982 – 1998, January 2002

  17. Policy Challenges • All youth need a high level of core academic skills, regardless of their chosen educational and career path. • Many high schools and traditional voc-ed programs are not currently designed to meet this objective. • Millions of adults currently in the workforce also need to strengthen and acquire new academic and technical skills. • Connections among high schools, postsecondary options and employers must be strengthened.

  18. The Bush Administration’s Key Education Principles • Increase accountability for student performance • Focus on what works • Reduce bureaucracy and increase flexibility • Choices for students and parents

  19. Key Policy Objectives for Career and Technical Education • Ensure that career and technical education programs complement the academic mission of No Child Left Behind. • Help all youth in CTE Pathway Programs receive a challenging academic core that prepares them for future education and career success.

  20. Key Policy Objectives for Career and Technical Education • Ensure that every CTE program offers a clear pathway into a postsecondary program leading to a credential, apprenticeship, associate or baccalaureate degree. • Make high-quality CTE pathway programs widely available to both youth and career-changing adults through a variety of institutions and delivery models. • Strengthen national andregional workforce quality and economic competitiveness.

  21. Program Overview • The Administration proposes the SecTech program, synthesizing the best of Perkins State Grants and Tech Prep. • States will use Perkins formula allocations to provide funding to partnerships among secondary schools and postsecondary organizations, including community and technical colleges, higher education and apprenticeship programs.

  22. Key Strategies • CTE Pathway Programs • Partnerships between High Schools and Postsecondary Partners • Challenging Academic Core • Non-duplicative technical courses leading to degree, certification or apprenticeship • Career pathways that are in-demand and lead to economic self-sufficiency • Flexible delivery models that focus on “what” not “where”

  23. The State Role • Create close coordination between secondary and postsecondary agencies to manage funds and program requirements. • Identify Challenging Academic Core classes as the minimum for all CTE pathway programs. • Develop and recognize series of CTE Pathway Programs. • Set criteria for funding to the local high schools and postsecondary institutions offering connected CTE Pathway Programs.

  24. Benefits for Students • Expands choices tailored to individual interests. • Ensures enrollment in core academic classes needed to open up postsecondary options. • Enables student to obtain college credits while still in high school. • Provides exposure to integrated career and college planning services. • Eases transition into and through college-level programs.

  25. Benefits for High School Educators & Leaders • Strengthens academic performance of all students, eliminates low-level tracking. • Positions career technical education as a key strategy in high school improvement. • Creates stronger linkages to postsecondary education, training and employment.

  26. Benefits for Community & Technical Colleges • Provides better prepared youth entrants who will need less remediation. • Strengthens student retention and completion. • Creates more compelling value to employer program partners. • Creates closer connections between baccalaureate programs and community college pathway programs.

  27. Benefits for Employers • Expands validated programs that teach skills that are in-demand in the marketplace. • Allows employers to work with colleges and high schools through unified partnerships around CTE Pathway Programs. • Connects local programs to industry-based and nationally-recognized skill standards. • Improves potential for working connections to the state workforce investment system.

  28. Key Policy Objectives for Career and Technical Education • Ensure that career technical education programs complement the academic mission of No Child Left Behind. • Help all youth in CTE Pathway Programs receive a challenging academic core that prepares them for future education and career success.

  29. Key Policy Objectives for Career and Technical Education • Ensure that every CTE program offers a clear pathway into a postsecondary program leading to a credential, apprenticeship, associate or baccalaureate degree. • Make high-quality CTE pathway programs widely available to both youth and career-changing adults through a variety of institutions and delivery models. • Strengthen national andregional workforce quality and economic competitiveness.

  30. Policy Directions forCareer and Technical Education www.ed.gov/offices/OVAE/ Hans K. Meeder Send questions and comments to: OVAE@ed.gov Updated 11/13/2003

More Related