1 / 33

Dispute Resolution Methods

Dispute Resolution Methods. Annual Program of the Claims Avoidance and Resolution Committee of the Construction Institute March 11, 2010 – Los Angeles. Dispute Resolution Methods. An introductory survey of the construction industry’s commonly used dispute resolution methods. Negotiation

elina
Download Presentation

Dispute Resolution Methods

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Dispute Resolution Methods Annual Program of the Claims Avoidance and Resolution Committee of the Construction Institute March 11, 2010 – Los Angeles

  2. Dispute Resolution Methods • An introductory survey of the construction industry’s commonly used dispute resolution methods. • Negotiation • Mediation • Dispute Review Boards • Arbitration • Litigation

  3. Opening Session • Session information compiled by members of the Dispute Resolution Methods Sub-Committee of the Claims Avoidance and Resolution Committee • Sub-Committee Members and Contributors: • Chair: Chip Ossman, Ossman Project Management Consulting, Inc. • Ken Haines, Nautilus Consulting, Inc. • Hal McKittrick, McKittrick & Associates • Ray Pixley, The City of New York • Larry Lenahan, McNally Tunneling, Inc. • And with grateful memory for his guidance and input, Frank Muller

  4. What is a Dispute? • A Change Proposal? • A Rejected Change Proposal? • A Weather Day Definition? • A Claim? • A Delay Submittal? • An Or-Equal Equipment Submittal?

  5. Dispute Resolution Methods An Owner and a Contractor have a site meeting to resolve some open issues.

  6. Dispute Resolution Methods • Multiple primes, Designers, Owners, Subcontractors, have a site meeting to discuss project goal setting

  7. Dispute Resolution Methods • Avoidance • Negotiation • Mediation • Dispute Review Board • Arbitration • Litigation • Self-help

  8. Avoidance • Even avoidance isn’t avoidance • In construction we have lots of reasons to avoid confrontation • In construction, 99% of avoided disputes become bigger – they fester – they don’t self-resolveBut sometimesresolution takesa while …

  9. Negotiation • Dispute resolution between the parties involving only the parties • Casual • Conversations, emails, texts, phone calls • Formal • Meetings, documentation, presentations • Resolution • Regardless of how you got there:Put it in writing

  10. Elevating the Negotiation • Can’t settle at the jobsite level? • Push the dispute “upstairs” – “bubble up” • Again, only the parties are involved • May be multiple meetings • Resolution must be written

  11. Mediation • Mediation: Bringing in a respected, neutral, uninvolved person to help everyone reach a mutually acceptable resolution • The mediator DOES NOT decide • Mediation may not resolve a dispute • Key Points • Voluntary • The resolution is binding, but the process is not • There is no such thing as “Binding Mediation” • You set the rules

  12. Mediation • The Parties must agree to mediate • The Parties must select a mediator • The Contract may define mediation terms, procedures, maybe even the mediator • Select a mediator with whom you are comfortable and who you believe will also be credible with the other parties

  13. Mediation – The Process • Parties provide the Mediator with information to understand the dispute • The Mediator chooses to meet individually with the parties, or to call all parties together in a “joint session” • After a sufficient exchange of information, the Mediator breaks the parties apart and begins shuttle diplomacy • The Mediator works for you – make the Mediator work, not just shuffle back and forth

  14. Mediation Resolution – Looking for Interests $$The ChangeRequest Amount The Apparent Position SS Project The Hidden, Unrecognized Interests The Next Change Request Liquidated Damages Cash Flow Budget I don’t wanna analyze a detailed claim Career Client Relationship Schedule What will the Board Say? Industry Reputation The Bottom Line

  15. Mediation – The Resolution • Mediators DO NOT Decide • The Parties decide • The Mediator’s Proposal • Usually offered at gridlock • Not always offered • May be requested • NOT binding until all parties accept • The process is still voluntary

  16. Dispute Review Boards • A contractually defined process • 3 members – all are neutral: • Contractor nominated, Owner nominated • Those two appoint the 3rd neutral • Typically defined in the contract • But can be established any time the parties agree to do so • Regular site visits • Conducts hearings

  17. Dispute Review Board Hearings • Frequently “no attorneys” • Parties explain their version to the DRB • Exhibits, Calculations, Presentations • DRB hears and receives the information

  18. Dispute Review Board Decisions • Check your contract – terms vary • Typically non-binding but admissible • Probably the best independent evaluation you’ll ever get for your problem

  19. Arbitration • Arbitration is the submission of a dispute to one or more impartial persons for a final and binding decision, known as an "award." • Awards are made in writing and are generally final and binding on the parties in the case. From the American Arbitration Association website: www.adr.org

  20. Non-Binding Arbitration • When the parties agree to Arbitrate, but also agree that the result will only be binding if all parties agree to accept the decision • Many view this as a “dry-run” • Could be considered similar to the Dispute Review Board, but without the project knowledge of the DRB members • In our Dispute Resolution Committee’s experience – not a common Dispute Resolution Methodology

  21. Arbitration – Getting There • Many times contract defined • Always an option if all parties agree • Variety of arbitration providers, including: • American Arbitration Association • JAMS: Judicial and Mediation Services • Most localities have regional providers • Private individuals

  22. Arbitrator Selection • Big Benefit: You “choose” your Judge • Must be confirmed independent and unrelated • Look for folks who will understand your situation, but without bringing too much bias and pre-conceived resolutions • Consider the expediency of a single arbitrator versus the combined wisdom of a three-party panel

  23. The Hearings • NO Ex Parte communications • Arbitrator sets schedule • Proceedings are formalized through rules • Evidence is presented through sworn testimony • Arbitrator may question the witnesses and the attorneys • Arbitrator sets, with party input, closing briefs, submission timelines, and form of decision

  24. The Decision • The Final Decision is Final • There are very few accepted ways to overturn a Decision: • The Arbitrator failed to hear evidence • The Arbitrator was on the take, misbehavior • The Arbitrator exceeded the powers granted to the Arbitrator • Other than winning an appeal using one or more of those conditions – you are stuck with the Decision.

  25. Arbitration Pluses & Minuses • Finality • Letting a knowledgeable someone else decide • Speed • Cost • Evidence Rules – Discovery, Depositions • Hearing Flexibility – dates, format, location • Confidential Proceedings • Predictability

  26. Litigation • May be a Federal or State Agency • Board of Contract Appeals, for example • In a courtroom, you get to choose • Judge: “Bench Trial” • Yesterday, the Judge sentenced a rapist to life, today, the Judge is hearing you argue about money and time • Jury: Your “Peers” • Check that jury pool – do any of them really understand the nuances of a construction project?

  27. Litigation • Getting There • Many times contract defined • Any party can initiate: “I’m gonna sue you!” • Adjudicator Selection • The Judge is assigned • You may be able to choose a jury • Hearings • Strict rules of evidence • The Court’s schedule – your schedule just doesn’t matter.

  28. Litigation - Process • Tedious • Discovery – produce Everything • Depositions • Motions, Legal Positioning • Pre-Trial Hearings • Finally, the Hearing itself

  29. Litigation - Frustration • Cancel your vacation, you’re scheduled to be in Court • But the Court will delay, as you are “trailing” • When you do arrive, plan on short days with lots of vacant time • Remember the money you are paying your team to be there.

  30. Litigation – The Decision • Likely one party won’t like the Decision • That party will then file for appeal • Regardless of entitlement • Filing is to slow the payment process • Frequently used to encourage the “winner” to accept an immediate but smaller resolution • After years in Trial Court, now years of Appeals • And you may be sent back for a new trial

  31. Litigation Closure I’m just so glad, I won…

  32. In Summary – The Descending Arrow of Escalation Avoidance Negotiation Mediation Self-Decided - You Keep a Say in the Decision Dispute Review Boards Adapted from: Christopher Moore’s The Mediation Process, 1996, p. 7 Adjudicated - Someone Else Decides Your Fate Arbitration Litigation

  33. Closure ? and A What’s Next? A 15 minute break, then Delay Claims from the Owner’s and Contractor’s Perspectives

More Related