1 / 28

Working Through Mistakes, Miscues, and Mishaps in Actinide Separations

Working Through Mistakes, Miscues, and Mishaps in Actinide Separations. Shane Knockemus US EPA / NAREL Montgomery, AL May 4, 2004. Goal.

elin
Download Presentation

Working Through Mistakes, Miscues, and Mishaps in Actinide Separations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Working Through Mistakes, Miscues, and Mishaps in Actinide Separations Shane Knockemus US EPA / NAREL Montgomery, AL May 4, 2004

  2. Goal • To give some examples of laboratory goof ups that I have been victim of, and how to salvage a successful analysis without having to rerun the sample from square one. • My examples include using the wrong strip solutions, omitting important oxidation/reduction steps, and arranging the cartridges in the wrong order.

  3. TEVA / TRU separation scheme

  4. Goof up scenario #1 • What went wrong?….I used the U strip solution (ammonium oxalate) to elute Pu fraction. • Result: Pu and U were eluted together. • Point of realization? • How to salvage usable analyses….If the mistake is realized before it is too late the Pu. and U may be precipitated selectively. • It may also be an option to precipitate Pu and U together if both were precipitated in the presence of TiCl3. Good resolution is a necessity.

  5. Selective Precipitation Scenario Sol’n w/ Pu+4 and U+6 Nd+3, HF filter---save filtrate Sol’n w/ U+6 NdF3--Pu reduce volume Nd+3, TiCl3, HF NdF3--U

  6. Clean Pu Spectrum

  7. Clean U Spectrum Precipitating the U fraction from the filtrate of the Pu pptn can diminish the recovery slightly (10-20%), but results are still within acceptable ranges.

  8. Pu and U Together With slightly improved resolution, which may be obtained by counting the sample on a lower shelf, Pu and U could possibly be determined simultaneously.

  9. Goof Up Scenario #2 • What went wrong?…ferrous sulfamate was not added to load solution. • Result: Pu will remain in the +4 valence, and will be retained and eluted with Th fraction from TEVA. • Point of realization?…If the mistake is realized after the Th fraction has already been filtered and counted then the filter must be leached and/or wet ashed to do chemistry that will enable Pu / Th separation. If the mistake is realized prior to the precipitation and filtration of Th, but after the elution of Th (and Pu), the solution containing the Pu / Th mixture may be used for subsequent chemistry.

  10. Pu and Th Together

  11. Th / Pu Separation Scheme Sol’n w/ Th and Pu SO4-2, BaCl2 BaSO4 (Th, Pu) Filtrate w/ PuO2+2 EDTA HClO4, heat Ti+3, KOH Ti(OH)3 -- (Th, Pu) Water, Fe+2, Nd+3, HF HClO4, water, Nd+3 KMnO4, HF NdF3 -- Pu NdF3 – Th (save filtrate)

  12. Pu-less Th Spectrum

  13. Pu Spectrum

  14. Goof Up Scenario #3 • What went wrong?….did not oxidize Pu to +4 valence prior to elution of Am from TRU. • Result: Pu will remain in +3 valence, and will be eluted with Am fraction. • Point of realization?…before or after precipitation. • Subsequent chemistry involved in separating Am and Pu will be the same as the Th / Pu chemistry involved in “Goof up scenario #2”, whereas the Am will behave the same as Th.

  15. Pu and Am Together

  16. Pu-less Am Spectrum

  17. Pu Spectrum

  18. Goof Up Scenario #4 • What went wrong?….cartridges set up in wrong order (TRU-TEVA rather than TEVA-TRU). • Result: Everything retained on TRU. • Point of realization?….at the time of disconnecting tandem arrangement. • Subsequent chemistry involved in obtaining usable analyses involves a mixture of things already covered.

  19. Spectrum of Everything Retained on TRU Everything stripped from TRU with 0.1 M ammonium oxalate

  20. How to Salvage Usable Analyses • Everything on TRU (Am+3, Pu+3, Th+4, U+6). • Am eluted with 4 M HCl. • Pu / Th eluted together with 1 M HCl / 0.1 M oxalic acid. Pu and Th separated by chemistry demonstrated in ‘Goof Up Scenario #2’. • U eluted with 0.1 M ammonium oxalate.

  21. Spectra From Goof Up #4

  22. Super Goof Up Scenario • What went wrong?….cartridges were arranged in the wrong order, ferrous sulfamate reduction of Pu omitted, sodium nitrite oxidation of Pu omitted, and wrong stripping solutions were used.

  23. How To Fix Super Goof Up • Get out of the lab! • Sober up. • Consider a desk job.

  24. Problems Encountered • The behavior and stability of Pu at the +6 valence proved to be hard to predict at times. • In scenario # 2, 3, and 4 getting Pu to maintain a +6 valence during the NdF3 precipitation of both Th and Am proved to be difficult and at times not complete. • Don’t co-precipitate samples with CeF3 in the presence of a strong oxidizer, as it will oxidize the Ce to +4 valence and will render the fluoride precipitation impossible.

  25. Pu Contamination in Th Spectra

  26. Pu Contamination in Am Spectrum

  27. Acknowledgements • The chemistry involved in obtaining successful separations was borrowed / learned from David Sill and Steven Bohrer from RESL in Idaho Falls, ID.

  28. Conclusions • Mistakes are inevitable as long as humans are involved. • Don’t be too quick to dump a sample and start over when a mistake is made. Something can be learned from most mistakes. • Successful separations are still quite possible in most situations when mistakes are made.

More Related