1 / 24

Using aerial photography & fertigation to fine-tune N management

Using aerial photography & fertigation to fine-tune N management. Peter Scharf MU Agronomy Extension. Why fertigate?. Avoid N loss from leaching Unable to apply at normal time due to weather Respond to N loss or deficiency Fine-tune N management

eliad
Download Presentation

Using aerial photography & fertigation to fine-tune N management

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Using aerial photography & fertigation to fine-tune N management Peter Scharf MU Agronomy Extension

  2. Why fertigate? • Avoid N loss from leaching • Unable to apply at normal time due to weather • Respond to N loss or deficiency • Fine-tune N management • Gives a yield boost that earlier applications can’t achieve

  3. Reason #1: Avoid N loss from leaching • N uptake mostly from knee-high to early grain fill • Later application reduces the window of time between N application and uptake • Reduced time = reduced risk of N loss

  4. N uptake timing: good match with fertigation Corn N uptake 100 % of uptake 0 V6 V12 VT milk Growth stage

  5. Reason #1: Avoid N loss from leaching • Especially on sandy soils • N loss can cause yield loss • Same N rate but applied later through pivot = lower risk • This is the same concept as sidedress N being lower risk than preplant

  6. Losing N & yield (sandy soil)

  7. Situation #2: Unable to apply N at normal time 2003 rainfall, April 1 - June 15

  8. Situation #2: Unable to apply N at normal time • This is not an uncommon situation in Missouri • When it happens, what are the considerations for amount and time of fertigation?

  9. Timing of fertigation when main N application was missed • Corn is less sensitive to N timing than you might think • 28 experiments, mostly on-farm: • No yield loss if first N applied by chest high • 3% yield loss if first N applied from chest high to 8 feet tall • 15% yield loss if first N applied at silking

  10. Timing of fertigation when main N application was missed Eight production corn fields, 1997 plant 18” 36” 80”

  11. Situation #2: Unable to apply N at normal time • Soil is wet • You may be tempted to rush irrigation in order to get N to the crop • This may not be necessary • Injection system needs enough capacity to apply most of crop N need through the pivot

  12. Timing of fertigation when main N application was missed • As soon as possible, but don’t rush to irrigate on wet ground • Even if delayed until silking, fertigating will be highly profitable if the main N application was missed due to weather • No later than two weeks after tasseling

  13. Situation #3: N was applied, but it was lost Northeast Missouri, 1998--wet May and June weather

  14. Situation #3: N was applied, but it was lost • 2002—two experiments where applied N was lost • Both near Brunswick/Miami • Soil N good on May 22 (but 9 inches of rain since April 26) • 9 more inches of rain, May 22 to June 15 • 40 and 60 bu/acre responses to added N

  15. Diagnosing N loss • This is the hard part • Deciding if additional N is needed • Prioritizing fields • Deciding how much N to apply • Aerial view is best • Cover more ground faster than other ways of doing diagnosis • Better overall assessment

  16. Diagnosing N loss from an airplane • Photographs are better than memory • There are some pilots around who will do this for a reasonable price • There are companies considering developing an aerial photo/recommendation map service • This is not commercially available at present • A seat-of-the-pants interpretation of where to put more N and where to put less will probably be fairly accurate

  17. Situation #4: Fine-tuning N management • Expect a yield response only when corn has visible N stress • Gene Stevens: fertigation experiment on Watkins farm • N stress measured with chlorophyll meter • High N stress: 35 bu/acre response • Low N stress: 10 bu/acre response • No N stress: no response

  18. Aerial photographs Applicator-mounted spectral radiometer Tools for fine-tuning N management

  19. Aerial photos to fine-tune N management • Research at the University of Missouri has related corn color from aerial photos to: • Corn yield response to N • Amount of N needed • Applying these relationships to photos of pivot fields can guide fertigation decisions

  20. 15% lighter 25% lighter An example from project Team Up! Photo July 3, 2003 Atchison County

  21. Interpreting lighter areas—watch out for: • Tassels • Tasseled corn appears lighter than corn that has not yet tasseled • If only part of the field has tasseled, it will appear lighter than the rest of the field • Rather than being the N-deficient areas, these areas are farther along and may have the BEST nitrogen supply of anywhere in the field • The influence of soil color (if the corn has not reached full canopy) • The influence of corn size on how much soil you see

  22. 50 N 100 N Zero N An example from project Team Up! Photo July 3, 2003 Atchison County

  23. 10 to 30 bu An example from project Team Up! Joe Henggeler calculates variable fertigation $2000 better than uniform Image analysis predicts: 30 to 60 bu No response

  24. Fertigating corn: summary • Reliable way to supply N • reduces risk of N (& yield) loss on sandy soils • Good tool for managing unexpected N loss • Potential for supplying needed N very accurately with no overapplication

More Related