1 / 38

Lecture 9: Unstructured Data

Lecture 9: Unstructured Data. Information Retrieval Types of Systems, Documents, Tasks Evaluation: Precision, Recall Search Engines (Google) Architecture Web Crawling Query Processing Inverted Indexes PageRank (!)

eli
Download Presentation

Lecture 9: Unstructured Data

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Lecture 9: Unstructured Data • Information Retrieval • Types of Systems, Documents, Tasks • Evaluation: Precision, Recall • Search Engines (Google) • Architecture • Web Crawling • Query Processing • Inverted Indexes • PageRank (!) Most of the IR portion of this material is take from the course "Information retrieval on the Internet" by Maier and Price, taught at PSU in alternate years.

  2. Leaarning Objectives • LO9.1 Given a Transition matrix draw a transition graph, and vice versa. • LO9.2 Given a Transition matrix, and a residence vector, decide if it is the PageRank for that matrix.

  3. Information Retrieval (IR) • The study of Unstructured Data is called Information Retrieval (IR) • A Database refers to Structured Data

  4. General types of IR systems • Web Pages • Full text documents • Bibliographies • Distributed variations • Metasearch • Virtual document collections

  5. Types of Documents in IR Systems • Hyperlinked or not • Format • HTML • PDF • Word Processed • Scanned OCR • Type • Text • Multimedia • Semistructured, e.g., XML • Static or Dynamic

  6. Types of tasks in IR systems • Find • an overview • a fact/answer a question • comprehensive information • a known item (document, page or site) • a site to execute a transaction (e.g., buy a book, download a file)

  7. Evaluation • How can we evaluate performance of an IR system? • System perspective • User perspective • User perspective: Relevance • (How well) does a document satisfy a user's need? • Ideally, an IR system will retrieve exactly those items that satisfy the user's needs, no more, no less. • More: wastes user's time • Less: user misses valuable information

  8. Notation In response to a user’s query: The IR system • reTrieves a set of documents T The user • knows the set of reLevant documents L |X| denotes the number of documents in X Ideally, T = L, no more (no junk), no less(no missing)

  9. Retrieved, Not Relevant = Junk Relevant, Not Retrieved = Missing The big picture • |TL|  |T| • = 1 if No Junk • Precision • = fraction of retrieved items that were relevant • =1 if all retrieved items were relevant T TL L • |TL|  |L| • = 1 if No Missing • Recall • = fraction of relevant items that were retrieved • =1 if all the relevant items were retrieved

  10. Context • Precision, Recall were created for IR systems that retrieved from a small set of items. • In that case one could calculate T and L. • Web search engines do not fit this model well; T and L are huge. • Recall does not make sense in this model, but we can apply the definition of “precision@10”, measuring the fraction of relevant items that were retrieved among the first 10 displayed.

  11. Experiment • Compute Precision@10,20 for Google, Bing and Yahoo for this query: • Paris Hilton Hotel • Precision = fraction of retrieved items that are relevant

  12. Search Engine Architecture • How often do you google? • What happens when you google? • http://www.google.com/corporate/tech.html • Average time: half a second • We need a crawler to create the indexes and docs. • Notice that the web crawler creates the docs. • From the docs, the indexes are created and the docs are given ranks… cf. later slides. • Let's study the Web Crawler Algorithm (WCA) • Page 1143 of the handout

  13. Web Crawler Algorithm • Input: Set of popular URLs S • Output: Repository of visited web pages R • Method: • If S is empty, end • Select page p from S to crawl, delete p from S • Get p* (page that p points to). • If p* is in R, return to (1), • Else add p* to R, and add to S all outlinks from p* unless they are already in R or S • Return to step (1)

  14. WCA: Terminating Search • Limit the number of pages crawled • Total number of pages, or • Pages per site • Limit the depth of the crawl

  15. WCA: Managing the Repository • Don't add duplicates to S • Need an index on S, probably hash • Don't add duplicates to R • Cannot happen since we search each URL only once? • A page can come from >1 URL; mirror sites • So use hash table of pages in R

  16. WCA: Select Next Page in S? • Can use Random Search • Better: Most Important First • Can consider first set of pages to be most important • As pages are added, make them less important • Breadth first search • Can do a simplified PageRank (cf. later) calculation

  17. WCA: Faster, Faster • Multiprogramming, Multiprocessing • Must manage locks on S • With billions of URLs, this becomes a bottlneck • So assign each process to a host/site, not a URL • This can become a denial-of-service attack, so throttle down and take on several sites, organized by hash buckets • R also has bottleneck problems, and can be handled with locks

  18. On to Query Processing • Very different from structured data: no SQL, parser, optimizer • Input is boolean combination of keywords • data [and] base • data OR base • Google's goal is an engine that "understands exactly what you mean and gives you back exactly what you want "

  19. Inverted Indexes • When the crawl is complete, the search engine builds, for each and every word, an inverted index. • An inverted index is a list of all documents containing that word • The index may be a bit vector • It may also contain the location(s) of the word in the document • Word: any word in any language, plus misspelling, plus any sequence of characters surrounded by punctuation! Hundreds of millions of words Farms of PCs, e.g. near Bonneville Dam, to hold all this data

  20. Mechanics of Query Processing • Relevant inverted indexes are found • Typically the indexes are in memory, otherwise this could take a full half second • If they are bit vectors, they are ANDed or ORed, then materialized, then lists are handled • Result is many URLs. • Next step is to determine their rank so the highest ranked URLs can be delivered to the user.

  21. Ranking Pages • Indexes have returned pages. Which ones are mostrelevant to you? • There are many criteria for ranking pages; here are some no-brainers (except !) • Presence of all words • All words close together • Words in important locations and formats on the page • ! Words near anchor text of links in reference pages • But the killer criteria is PageRank

  22. PageRank Intuition • You need to find a plumber. How do you do it? • Call plumbers and talk to them • ! Call friends and ask for plumber references • Then choose plumbers who have the most references • !! Call friends who know a lot about plumbers (important friends) and ask them for plumber references • Then choose plumbers who have the most references from important people. • Technique 1 was used before Google. • Google introduced technique 2 to search engines • Google also introduced technique 3 • Techniques 2, and especially 3, wiped out the competition. • The big challenge: determine which pages are important

  23. What does this mean for pages? • Most search engines look for pages containing the word "plumber" • Google searches for pages that are linked to by pages containing "plumber". • Google searches for pages that are linked to by important pages containing "plumber". • A web page is important if many important pages link to it. • This is a recursive equation. • Google solves it by imagining a web walker.

  24. The Web Walker • From page p, the walker follows a random link in p • Note that all links in p have equal weight • The walker walks for a very, very, long time. • A residence vector [ y a m ] describes the percentage of time that the walker spends on each page • What does the vector [1/3 1/3 1/3 ] mean? • In steady state, the residence vector will be (1st draft of) the PageRank • Observe: pages with many in-links are visited often • Observe: important pages are visited most often

  25. Stochastic Transition Matrix • To describe the page walker's moves, we use a stochastic transition matrix. • Stochastic = each column sums to 1 • There are 3 web pages: Yahoo, Amazon and Microsoft • This matrix means that the Yahoo page has 2 outlinks, to Yahoo (a self-link) and to Amazon, etc. YAM ½ ½ 0 ½ 0 1 0 ½ 0 Matrix =

  26. Transition Graph • Each Transition Matrix corresponds to a Transition Graph, e.g. 1/2 Y 1/2 1/2 1 M A 1/2

  27. LO9.1:Transition Graph* YAM • What is the Transition Graph for this Matrix? 0 ½⅔ ⅓ 0 ⅓ ⅔½ 0

  28. Solving for Page Rank • For small dimension matrices it is simple to calculate the PageRank using Gaussian Elimination. • Remember [y,a,m] is the time the walker spends at each site. Since it is a probability distribution, y+a+m=1. Since the walker has reached steady state, ½ ½ 0 ½ 0 1 0 ½ 0 y a m y a m =

  29. Solving, ctd • Solving such small equations is easy, but in reality the matrix dimension is the number of pages in the web, so it is in the billions. • There is a simpler way, called relaxation. • Start with a distribution, typically equal values, and transform it by the matrix. 2/6 3/6 1/6 ½ ½ 0 ½ 0 1 0 ½ 0 1/3 1/3 1/3 =

  30. Solving, ctd • If we repeat this only 5-10* times the vectors converge to values very close to [2/5,2/5,1/5]. Check that this is a solution: 2/5 2/5 1/5 ½ ½ 0 ½ 0 1 0 ½ 0 2/5 2/5 1/5 = • This solution gives the PageRank of each page on the Web. • It is also called the eigenvector of the matrix with eigenvalue one. • Does this agree with our intuition about Page Rank? *For real web values, at most 100 iterations suffice

  31. LO9.2: Identify Solution • Is [ 3/8, 1/4, 3/8 ] a solution for this transition matrix ? 0 ½⅔ ⅓ 0 ⅓ ⅔ ½ 0

  32. A Spider Trap ½ ½ 0 ½ 0 0 0 ½ 1 • Let's look at a more realistic example called a spider trap. M = • The Transition Graph is: • M represents any set of web pages that does not have a link outside the set. 1/2 Y 1/2 1 1/2 A M 1/2

  33. A Spider Trap • The Page Rank is: 0 0 1 ½ ½ 0 ½ 0 0 0 ½ 1 0 0 1 = • Relaxation arrives at this vector because a random walker arrives at M and stays there in a loop. • This Page Rank vector violates the Page Rank principle that inlinks should determine importance.

  34. A Dead End ½ ½ 0 ½ 0 0 0 ½ 0 • A similar example, called a dead end, is M = • The Transition Graph is: • M represents any set of web pages that does not have out-links. 1/2 Y 1/2 1/2 A M 1/2

  35. A Dead End, ctd • A dead end matrix is not stochastic, because M does not obey the stochastic rule. • The only eigenvector for a dead end matrix is the zero vector. • Relaxation arrives at the zero vector because a random walker arrives at M and then has nowhere to go.

  36. What to do? • In these cases, which happen all the time on the web, the web walker algorithm does not identify which pages are truly important. • But we can tweak the algorithm to do so: Every 5th walk, or so, the walker steps to a random page on the web. • Then the walk (spider trap example) becomes ½ ½ 0 ½ 0 0 0 ½ 1 1/3 1/3 1/3 Pnew = 0.8 * Pold + 0.2 *

  37. Teleporter • Now our tweaked random walker is a teleporter. • With probability 80%* s/he follows a random link from the current page, as before. • But with probability 20% s/he teleports to a random page with uniform probability. • It could be anywhere on the web, even the current page • If s/he is at a dead end, with 100% probability s/he teleports to a random page with uniform probability. *80-20% are tunable paramaters

  38. Solving the Teleporter Equation • The equation on slide 36 describes the teleporter's walk. It can be solved using relaxation or Gaussian elimination. • The solution is (7/33, 5/33, 21/33) . • It gives unreasonably high importance to M, but does recognize that Y is more important than A.

More Related