Download
1 / 22

Who cares about Rho GTPases? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 121 Views
  • Uploaded on

Who cares about Rho GTPases?. Clostridium spp. Salmonella spp. Bordetella spp. Neisseria spp. http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/3504/gallery.htm. Historical GTPase Events. 1985 – isolation of Rho = ‘ R as ho molog’

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Who cares about Rho GTPases?' - eldora


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Who cares about rho gtpases
Who cares about Rho GTPases?

Clostridium spp.

Salmonella spp.

Bordetella spp. Neisseria spp.

http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/3504/gallery.htm


Historical gtpase events
Historical GTPase Events

  • 1985 – isolation of Rho = ‘Ras homolog’

  • 1989 – C3 transferase shown to inactivate RhoC => actin disruption in host cells. Isolation of Rac = ‘Ras substrate of C3’.

  • 1990’s – Rho/Rac GTPases shown to act as switches to control membrane receptors and actin cytoskeleton plasticity.


Salmonella enterica
Salmonella enterica

Type III Secretion System (TTSS) for translocation of virulence factors

http://info.med.yale.edu/micropath/galan/Pages/galan_overview.html


Salmonella chaperone proteins
Salmonella chaperone proteins


After effector translocation
…after effector translocation…

Bacterial changes: transient bacterial ‘invasome’ appendages

Host cell changes: macropinocytosis for uptake of Salmonella in nonphagocytic cells

bacterial induced apoptosis in phagocytic cells.


Salmonella invasion summary
Salmonella invasion summary

http://info.med.yale.edu/micropath/galan/Pages/galan_overview.html


Bacterial strategies
Bacterial Strategies

RHO FAMILY GTPASES: Rho, Rac, Cdc42

BACTERIAL INHIBITION OF RHO PROTEINS:

-Large clostridial toxins: Toxin A, B, Lethal Toxin

-C. botulinum C3 transferase

-Salmonella SptP, Yersinia YopE

BACTERIAL ACTIVATION OF RHO PROTEINS:

-E.coli CNF1 and 2 Toxins

-Bordetella dermonecrotizing toxin (DNT)

-Salmonella SopE, Yersinia CNFY



Fig 2 bacterial virulence factors affect spatial and temporal regulation of rho
Fig. 2. Bacterial virulence factors affect factors.spatial and temporal regulation of Rho.


Why target rho gtpases
Why target Rho GTPases? factors.

  • Invasion can be dangerous!

    • Innate immunity – recognize ‘non-self’ and opsonize for phagocytic cell recognition. LPS recognized by TLRs stimulates NF-KB and leads to transcription of antibacterial factors.

    • Cell shedding removes adhered bacteria.

    • Adaptive immunity… takes time.

  • Virulence factors help microbes invade on their own terms! Rho GTPases are key.


Fig 3 virulence factors can adapt or mimic eukaryotic mechanisms
Fig. 3. Virulence factors can adapt or mimic factors.eukaryotic mechanisms.


How do virulence factors enter
How do virulence factors enter? factors.

  • Toxins

    • Can act distantly to bacteria because all required elements for virulence self-contained.

    • Diptheria A-B example:

      • A region – catalytically active, delivered to cytosol.

      • B region – for binding host cell and translocating the A-enzymatic fragment to host cytosol at low pH.

  • Type III or IV Secretion Systems




Rho inhibitors
Rho Inhibitors the cell cytosol.

  • Classical model:

    • Toxins effects were irreversible, while TTSS induced reversible changes in Rho.

  • Large clostridial toxins (LCTs)

    • Toxins A, B, Lethal Toxin.

  • Type Three Secretion Systems

    • Pseudomonas ExoS, ExoT.

    • Salmonella SptP, Yersinia YopT, YopE.

  • C3 transferases, YopT: spatial regulation.


Rho activators
Rho activators the cell cytosol.

  • E.coli CNF, Bordetella DNF:

    • Block RhoGAP activity so GTPase is permanently active until ubiquitinylation and proteosomal degradation.

    • Is proteosomal degradation of overactivated Rho a cellular defense that microbes are taking advantage of?

  • Salmonella SopE, E2:

    • Rho GEF function to activate Rho but is counterbalanced by SptP GAP activity.


Fig 5 comparison of activation deactivation of rac by salmonella sope sptp and e coli cnf1
Fig. 5. Comparison of activation-deactivation of Rac by the cell cytosol.Salmonella SopE/Sptp and E. coli CNF1.


Why activation deactivation
Why activation/deactivation? the cell cytosol.

  • Whether the bacteria supplies the Rho counterbalance (Salmonella) to virulence or the host cell provides it (E.coli)…

    -is it simply to return to ‘normal’ cell function?

    -or to enhance bacterial uptake?

    -or to avoid non-physiologic cell environs that prevent bacterial uptake at all?


Summary
Summary the cell cytosol.

  • Rho GTPases can be influenced by:

    • Activities from separate bacterial factors

      • Salmonella SopE, SptP; Yersinia YopE,YopT

    • Dual activity factors

      • Pseudomonas ExoS, ExoT

    • Single activity proteins

      • E. coli CNF1 Toxin

  • What is the future of the host-pathogen interaction? Extremes vs balance?


The end
The End the cell cytosol.


ad