1 / 18

RM-MSMSP Evaluation Presentation for Leadership Team Meeting

RM-MSMSP Evaluation Presentation for Leadership Team Meeting. Presented by Bonnie Walters Organized by Barbara P. Heath. Evaluation and Research Collaboration. Provides opportunity to Extend the evaluation process into research Share data Increase efficiency Create project-level database.

elan
Download Presentation

RM-MSMSP Evaluation Presentation for Leadership Team Meeting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. RM-MSMSP Evaluation PresentationforLeadership Team Meeting Presented by Bonnie Walters Organized by Barbara P. Heath September 12, 2006

  2. Evaluation and Research Collaboration • Provides opportunity to • Extend the evaluation process into research • Share data • Increase efficiency • Create project-level database

  3. Timeline: Year 3 Data Collection • Combines the evaluation and research sources (denoted by shading) • Includes description of: • Instruments • Data collection process • Random sample cycle • Summer camp outline Refer to timeline handout

  4. Summer 2006 Data Collection • TCI • Course Packs • Participant Post-Course Survey • Development Team Survey • Instructional Team Survey • RTOP Observations • Camp Surveys and Observations

  5. Analysis • In process • Individual reports for each instructional team • Case studies for each summer camp • Summary report for Management Team

  6. Preliminary TCI Results, SCI(results are statistically significant at the 0.001 level)

  7. Preliminary TCI Results, MATH(results are statistically significant at the 0.001 level)

  8. Participant Post-Course Survey:Response Rates

  9. Participant Post-Course Survey Refer to handout

  10. Participant Post-Course Survey • The overall quality of this course was… 0=Poor --> 5=Excellent

  11. Participant Post-Course Survey:% of Respondents who would recommend the course to others

  12. Participant Post-Course Survey • The course material was presented at an appropriate level. 0=Strongly Disagree --> 5=Strongly Agree

  13. Participant Post-Course Survey • The course stimulated my thinking about the content of (subject). 0=Strongly Disagree --> 5=Strongly Agree

  14. Participant Post-Course Survey • Interaction with classmates assisted with my learning. 0=Strongly Disagree --> 5=Strongly Agree

  15. Participant Post-Course Survey Refer to handout

  16. Preliminary Conclusions • All courses demonstrate increase in participant content knowledge on the individual Teacher Content Inventories (TCI). • Participants report high level of satisfaction with the individual courses they completed • Higher percentage of participants report they enroll in the courses to improve their teaching, lower percentage to earn stipend and graduate credit (compared to 2005 data)

  17. Acknowledgements • Dr. Aruna Lakshmanan, Statistician • Aaron Perlmutter, EMEC Project Coordinator • Alex Cramond, EMEC Summer Staff • Brandi Whaley, EMEC Staff

  18. Contact Information Barbara P. Heath, Ph.D. East Main Educational Consulting, LLC Wilmington, NC bpheath@bizec.rr.com (910) 620-4089

More Related