Language acquisition
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 50

Language acquisition PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 86 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Language acquisition. LING 200 Spring 2003. First language acquisition. (a.k.a. developmental psycholinguistics, L1). How is it that by age 5 children know their language? What they do along the way and why?. Methods for studying L1. Production studies

Download Presentation

Language acquisition

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Language acquisition

Language acquisition

LING 200

Spring 2003


First language acquisition

First language acquisition

(a.k.a. developmental psycholinguistics, L1)

  • How is it that by age 5 children know their language?

  • What they do along the way and why?


Methods for studying l1

Methods for studying L1

  • Production studies

    • Spontaneous productions (diary studies)

    • Elicited productions

      • “which doll should he pick up?”

    • Introspection

      • “Can you say ‘What did the hippo do?’”


Methods for studying l11

Methods for studying L1

  • Comprehension studies

    • Perception tasks

      • present, then change stimulus; measure pacifier sucking rate, heart beat

    • Judgement tasks

      • "The hippo fell over. Is that right?"

    • Act-out tasks

      • "make the hippo jump over the rhino, then make bullwinkle jump over him."


Production vs comprehension

Production vs. comprehension

  • Production lags behind comprehension

    • Recognition of polite forms precedes the ability to produce them.

      • Puppets requesting candy used direct forms like: ‘Give me candy.’

        Or indirect forms like: ‘I would like some candy.’ ‘May I have some candy?’

        Indirect forms were judged more polite.


Production vs comprehension1

Production vs. comprehension

  • Recognition of sounds precedes the ability to produce them.

    • ‘One of us...spoke to a child who called his inflated plastic fish a fis. In imitation of the child’s pronunciation, the observer said: “This is your fis?” “No,” said the child, “my fis”. He continued to reject the adult’s imitation until he was told, “That is your fish.” “Yes,” he said, “my fis.”


L1 milestones

L1 milestones

  • Babbling: 4-20 months

  • One-word: 12-18 months

  • Two-word: apx. 24 months


Babbling

Babbling

  • 0-1 months: crying, coughing

  • 2-3 months: “cooing and gooing” (production of velar consonants)

  • 4-6 months: produce greater variety of sounds, sounds more like language

  • 7-9 months: CV syllables, often reduplicated; e.g. [tata]canonical babbling


Babbling1

Babbling

  • 12 months:

    • relatively long sequences of gibberish

    • possibly with intonation

  • (12-13 months: first words)

  • 18-20 months: babbling ceases


Characteristics of babbling

Characteristics of babbling

  • Early babbling is largely independent of what sounds are heard

    • deaf children babble

    • hearing children of deaf parents babble

    • sounds produced may not be those heard in child's linguistic environment


Characteristics of canonical babbling

Characteristics of canonical babbling

  • Simple syllable structure (CV)

  • Simple consonants and vowels

    • most common consonants:

      • stops, /s/, /m n/, glides, /h/

    • infrequent consonants:

      • other fricatives, affricates, liquids, [N]

    • voiceless aspirated stops common in input to English babies, rare in babble


Characteristics of later babbling

Characteristics of later babbling

  • Language specific differences begin to emerge

    • Japanese babies: word final [] common

    • Spanish babies produce longer words

    • French babies produce more nasals

    • ASL babies: produce ASL-like movement


Later correlates of babble

Later correlates of babble

  • Greater amount and complexity of babble correlates with

    • vocabulary size, 18-24 months

    • phonological development, 36 months

    • age of onset of meaningful speech

  • Lesser amount of babble often correlates with

    • later speech and language disorders


Functions of babble

Functions of babble(?)

  • Establishes an auditory feedback loop

  • Provides motor practice

  • Stimulates adult-infant interactions


One word stage

One-word stage

  • Emerges around 12-18 months

  • Characteristics

    • words used as sentences

    • incipient word meaning; typical communicative functions:

      • naming

      • child's action

      • child’s desire for action

      • child’s emotion

    • simple phonology: CV syllables; CVCV words


Words known by eve at 15 months

Words known by Eve at 15 months

  • Mommy

  • Daddy

  • go

  • go?

  • gimme

  • baba ‘grandma’

  • dollie

  • cup

  • what?

  • wawa ‘water’

  • nana ‘blanket’


One word stage1

One-word stage

  • Phonological properties of words

    • 52 children, mean 15 months

      • Syllable structure

        • 37% CVCV

        • 26% CV(V)

        • 10% CVC

      • C1 = C2 (85%)

      • Frequency

        • most common initial: /b d m/

        • most common V__V: /d b m/

        • most common final: /t s k/


2 word stage

2-word stage

  • Emerges few months after 1-word stage

  • Characteristics

    • short (2-word) sentences

    • no inflectional affixes (e.g., genitive, 3sS -s)

    • minimal use of syntactic function words (e.g. determiners)

    • pronouns rare


Eve at 18 months

Eve at 18 months

  • more grape juice

  • drink juice

  • eating

  • no celery

  • Mommy soup

  • open toybox

  • Oh! Horsie stuck

  • write a paper

  • my pencil

  • What doing, Mommy?

  • Mommy head?


Beyond 2 word stage eve at 27 months

Beyond 2-word stage: Eve at 27 months

  • Put my pencil in there.

  • I go get a pencil ‘n write.

  • Don’t stand on my ice cubes.

  • I put them in the refrigerator to freeze.

  • An’ I want to take off my hat.

  • You come help us.

  • Just like Mommy has, and David has, and Sara has.

  • What is that on the table?

  • We’re going to make a blue house.

  • You make a blue one for me.


Eve at 27 months

Eve at 27 months

  • I have a fingernail.

  • And you have a fingernail.

  • This is not better.

  • See, this one better but this not better.

  • There some cream.

  • Put in you coffee.

  • They was in the refrigerator, cooking.

  • That why Jacky comed.

  • How ‘bout another eggnog instead of cheese sandwich?


Theories of first language acquisition

Theories of first language acquisition

  • Imitation hypothesis: children learn solely by imitating what they hear

  • Reinforcement hypothesis: children learn by being positively or negatively reinforced for certain kinds of behavior

  • Active construction of grammar hypothesis: children are actively constructing and refining a grammar of the language of their environment


Against reinforcement hypothesis

Against Reinforcement hypothesis

  • Children don't get a lot of corrections

    • some lexical/content corrections

    • not a lot of grammatical corrections

  • Children don't absorb a lot of the corrections they do hear:


Against imitation hypothesis

Against Imitation hypothesis

  • Children produce novel utterances (not in imitation of adult productions)

    • ‘other one spoon’

    • causatives:

      • 'you're fedding me up'

      • ‘Don’t eat her yet. She’s smelly!’(wants mother to change sister’s diaper before feeding her)

      • ‘These flowers are sneezing me!’


Language acquisition

  • novel verbs

    • ‘Why you didn’t jam my bread?’

    • ‘I hate you and I’ll never unhate you or nothing!’

    • ‘Put me that broom. Let’s get brooming.’

    • ‘Who growed it?’ (referring to potted plant)


Grammar construction hypothesis

Grammar construction hypothesis

  • Children make systematic, not random, errors

    • In phonology. Inventory of English consonants (age 2):


Language acquisition

Inventory of English consonants, age 4


Language acquisition

  • More systematic errors in phonology


Language acquisition

  • Systematic errors in morphology

    • Regularization of plurals

      • gooses

    • Regularization of past tense forms of verbs

      • heared, hitted, goed, bringed, comed;

      • I tooked it smaller

    • Regularization of comparative forms of adjectives:

      • He hitted me. He’s a puncher he is. He’s being badder and badder.


Acquisition summary thus far

Acquisition summary thus far

  • Regular stages of L1 can be identified

  • Theories of L1

    • only imitation

    • only reinforcement

    • grammar construction

      • errors are systematic

      • evidence of evolving grammar

        • phonology

        • morphology


Language acquisition

  • Systematic semantic errors

    • Overextension (broadening, hypernymy)


Language acquisition

  • Systematic semantic errors

    • Underextension (narrowing, hyponymy)


Language acquisition

  • Systematic syntactic errors: acquisition of negation


Innateness hypothesis

Innateness hypothesis

  • Humans are equipped with Universal Grammar, or are genetically programmed for language.

  • UG severely constrains the possible form that a human language may take.

  • The actual form of language is determined by environment/language experience.


Innateness hypothesis1

Innateness hypothesis

  • Noam Chomsky (1988) Language and Problems of Knowledge:

    ...language appears to be a true species property, unique to the human species in its essentials and a common part of our shared biological endowment, with little variation among humans apart from rather serious pathology. (p. 2)


Do only humans have language

Do only humans have language?

  • Noam Chomsky: 

    ...the language faculty does appear to be a unique human possession. Other organisms have their own systems of communication, but these have properties radically different from human language...In the past years there have been numerous efforts to teach other organisms (forexample, chimpanzees and gorillas) some of the rudiments of human language, but it is now widely recognized that these efforts have failed, a fact that will hardly surprise anyone who gives some thought to the matter. The language faculty confers enormous advantages on a species that possesses it. It is hardly likely that some species has this capacity but has never thought to use it until instructed by humans. That is about as likely as the discovery that on some remote island there is a species of bird that is perfectly capable of flight but has never thought to fly until instructed by humans in this skill. Although not a logical impossibility, this would be a biological miracle, and there is no reason to suppose that it has taken place. Rather, as we should have expected all along, the evidence suggests that the most rudimentary features of human language are far beyond the capacity of otherwise intelligent apes, just as the capacity to fly or the homing instinct of pigeons lie beyond the capacity of humans.


Chimp studies

Chimp studies

  • Summary of attempts to teach chimps English, ASL, manipulation of symbols

  • Chimps show some spontaneity, creativity

  • Skills comparable to 1-2 year old child

  • Don't get past 2-3 word stage

  • Limited syntax. Trouble with:

    • word order

    • structure dependent operations (e.g. conjunction)


Language as a species specific property

Language as a species-specific property

  • Chimps:

    • are capable of learning some aspects of human language

    • are not predisposed to learn human language

    • lack latent capacity for human language


Innate behaviors

Innate behaviors


Characteristics of innate behaviors

Characteristics of innate behaviors


L1 vs l2

L1 vs. L2

  • Children are able to completely master a first language, whereas adults rarely do:


Creoles and l1

Creoles and L1

  • Pidgin

    • No native speakers

    • Derived from two or more languages in contact

    • Lexicon typically relatively small

    • Variable and relatively simple grammar

  • E.g. Chinook Jargon


Creole

Creole

  • Pidgin that has undergone L1 for some speech community

  • Examples

    • Hawaiian Creole

    • Jamaican Creole


Claimed characteristics of creoles

Claimed characteristics of creoles

  • Relatively uniform (in contrast to great variability of pidgins)

  • Fully expressive

    • substantial lexicons

    • grammar not ‘simple’


Hawaiian creole marking of tense aspect

Hawaiian Creole marking of tense/aspect

  • past/perfect bin or wen;bin get ‘there was’:

    • Bin get one wahine she get three daughter. ‘There was a woman who had three daughters.’

  • habitual/present stay:

    • John them stay cockroach the kaukau. ‘John and his friends are stealing the food.’


Implications of creoles for innateness hypothesis

Implications of creoles for Innateness Hypothesis

  • Derek Bickerton (U. Hawaii):

    • ‘since creoles must have been invented in isolation, it is likely that some general ability, common to all people, is responsible for the linguistic similarities’

    • i.e., creoles owe their uniform complexity to L1


Acquisition summary

Acquisition summary

  • Characteristics of first language acquisition suggest that language is an innate behavior.

  • There is a “Critical Period” for the acquisition of a first language (critical age cases, L1 vs. L2 differences)

  • Children do not learn grammar solely by imitation or reinforcement; they learn by working out rules for themselves.


  • Login