Closing state corporate tax loopholes
Download
1 / 30

Closing State Corporate Tax Loopholes - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 78 Views
  • Uploaded on

Closing State Corporate Tax Loopholes. Michael Mazerov ([email protected]) Center on Budget & Policy Priorities AFL-CIO Workers’ Voice Conference San Francisco, California July 20, 2003. Why address state corporate tax loopholes (and giveaways)?.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Closing State Corporate Tax Loopholes' - edward-collier


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Closing state corporate tax loopholes

Closing State Corporate Tax Loopholes

Michael Mazerov ([email protected])

Center on Budget & Policy Priorities

AFL-CIO Workers’ Voice Conference

San Francisco, California

July 20, 2003






First do no harm stop new revenue losses from
First, DO NO HARM;Stop New Revenue Losses From:

  • State corporate income tax coupling to federal deduction for “bonus depreciation” in 2002 and 2003 federal tax cut bills

  • States can “decouple” their laws; 31 have already



First do no harm stop new revenue losses from1
First, DO NO HARM Depreciation”Stop New Revenue Losses From:

  • New economic development giveaways.

  • Still proliferating (e.g., “single sales factor” corporate tax formula enacted this year in Wisconsin)


First do no harm stop new revenue losses from2
First, DO NO HARM Depreciation”Stop New Revenue Losses From:

  • Proposed federal legislation restricting state corporate tax powers

  • Known as “business activity tax” (BAT) “nexus” bill

  • Would require a corp. to have a “substantial physical presence” in a state before that state could tax its profits

  • Higher nexus threshold than required at present, so states would lose $ rapidly

  • Opens up all kinds of new tax shelters


First do no harm block proposed bat nexus bill to avoid revenue losses
First, DO NO HARM; Block Proposed BAT Nexus Bill to Avoid Revenue Losses

  • NCSL considering resolution to endorse proposed BAT nexus bill

  • Corporate America demanding this bill as quid pro quo for empowering states to tax Internet sales

  • NCSL (rightfully) wants this; but too high a price to pay

  • Need to block any NCSL resolution on BAT nexus at this time


Closing corporate tax loopholes delaware holding companies
Closing Corporate Tax Loopholes: Delaware Holding Companies Revenue Losses

  • Public Enemy #1

  • A-k-a Passive Invest. Co. (PIC) or Intangibles Holding Co. (IHC)

  • Most often set up in DE, NV, MI

  • Most famous DHC is “Geoffrey [Giraffe]” DE subsidiary of Toys R Us

  • Are essentially shell corporations set up by banks and accounting firms; “HQs” of 500 DHCs are in a single DE building


How the dhc game works
How the DHC game works Revenue Losses

  • Step 1: Parent corporation sets up DHC in state without corporate income tax (NV) or that doesn’t tax corps whose only income is from intangible assets (DE, MI)

  • Step 2: Parent transfers to DHC its patents, trademarks, “know-how,” etc.

  • Step 3: DHC licenses back to parent the right to use patents, trademarks, etc. in exchange for tax-deductible royalties

  • Result: payment of royalties reduces (perhaps eliminates) taxable profit of parent, while DHC is not subject to tax on its profit


Documented DE Holding Companies Revenue Losses(see: Glenn Simpson, “A Tax Maneuver in Delaware Puts Squeeze on Other States,” Wall Street Journal, 8/9/02, page 1)



Shutting down dhc s strategy 1 quick fix
Shutting Down DHC-s Tax ShelterStrategy #1: Quick Fix

  • Amend state law to deny deductions for royalty/interest payments to DHC subsidiaries in tax haven states

  • Already enacted in AL, CT, MA, MS, NC, NJ, OH

  • Proposed and still alive in DC, PA

  • Business killed in MD, MO, TX

  • MA and NJ laws best model; business community has pushed through ineffective/weak versions in AR & NY


Shutting down dhc s long term solution
Shutting Down DHC-s Tax ShelterLong-term Solution

  • Switch state corporate income tax to “combined reporting” by amending law

  • Treats parent and subsidiaries as one corp. for tax purposes; therefore, no benefit to shifting income to DHC

  • Also nullifies other strategies for shifting income to out-of-state subsidiaries

  • 16 states already use

  • Govs, legislators, or activists pushed this session in IA, MD, MA, NY, WI (no success)



Closing corporate loopholes nowhere income
Closing Corporate Loopholes: Tax Shelter“Nowhere Income”

  • Problem: Corporations can make sales in states in which they don’t cross taxability threshold — “have nexus”

  • Solution: enact “throwback” or “throwout” rule

  • Ensures that corps. are taxed on profits they earn in states where they aren’t taxable — home state taxes profit instead

  • NJ enacted 2002; MD 2003 (Gov vetoed)



Eliminate unwarranted corporate tax giveaways
Eliminate Unwarranted Corporate Tax Giveaways Tax Shelter

  • Repeal “single sales factor formula”

  • Giveaway to corps. that sell most of what they produce out of state — especially manufacturers

  • Big business still actively seeking in AZ, CA, NJ, NY, PA, RI (be on guard)

  • Repeal being pushed in IL, MA, MO



Eliminate unwarranted corporate tax giveaways1
Eliminate Unwarranted Corporate Tax Giveaways

  • Repeal ability of corporations to “carry back” current losses to years in which they were profitable and obtain refunds of taxes paid in those years

  • Only minority of states still allow


States that need to repeal nol carrybacks
States that Need to Repeal NOL “Carrybacks”


Other current corporate tax reform efforts
Other Current Corporate Tax Reform Efforts

  • Legislation was introduced in TX to close “Delaware Sub” loophole (use of limited partnerships to avoid franchise tax). Gov. supported; business killed.

  • NV Gov. Quinn proposed business gross receipts tax — OK, but CIT better. Business killed.


Other corporate tax reform options enact corporate minimum taxes
Other Corporate Tax Reform Options: Enact Corporate Minimum Taxes

  • Enact a second corporate tax not based on profits; corp. pays higher of profits tax or tax on other base

  • NJ enacted alternative minimum tax last year based on gross receipts

  • Another good model is NH’s alternative tax based on value added


Other corporate tax reform options stop tax avoidance from limited liability companies
Other Corporate Tax Reform Options: Stop Tax Avoidance from “Limited Liability Companies”

  • LLCs are businesses whose profits are taxed on the owners’ tax returns — whether owners are individuals or other businesses

  • Growing evidence that corps are using LLCs to avoid state profits taxes

  • Need to pass laws requiring LLC to withhold and pay tax due from out-of-state owners unless owners agree in writing to pay tax due on their pro-rata share of LLC income


Chipping away at the internet catalog sales tax loophole
Chipping Away at the Internet/ Catalog Sales Tax Loophole “Limited Liability Companies”

  • Need federal law to ensure sales taxation of all Internet/catalog sales

  • But states can require their vendors to collect sales taxes (e.g. Dell Computer). AR, NC, SD do.

  • States can amend and then enforce laws to compel “dot-com” subsidiaries of retail store chains to charge sales tax (e.g. Barnes & Noble.com)


A recent column headline and accompanying cartoon
A recent column headline (and accompanying cartoon): “Limited Liability Companies”

“It’s Time to Curb Corporate Tax Shenanigans”

From

The Nation?

Mother Jones?


No! “Limited Liability Companies”

The Wall Street Journal (9/19/02)


Closing corporate tax loopholes repealing unwarranted giveaways
Closing Corporate Tax Loopholes & Repealing Unwarranted Giveaways

  • Time is ripe; take advantage of current anger about phony financial reporting and aggressive tax sheltering to push reform

  • Can raise meaningful amounts of revenue now and help preserve state programs from budget cuts

  • Lays the groundwork for revitalization of corp. income tax as state revenue source; without it, CIT will steadily decline


ad