1 / 15

Nutrition Cluster Performance Monitoring Review Workshop Findings

Nutrition Cluster Performance Monitoring Review Workshop Findings . 4 th April 2014 ARON HOTEL. The Process. 1. Planning In consultation with the Global Nutrition Cluster, the country team consulted with OCHA and agreed on the timelines for the survey (Dates) 2. CCPM Survey

edita
Download Presentation

Nutrition Cluster Performance Monitoring Review Workshop Findings

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Nutrition Cluster Performance MonitoringReview WorkshopFindings 4th April 2014 ARON HOTEL.

  2. The Process 1. Planning • In consultation with the Global Nutrition Cluster, the country team consulted with OCHA and agreed on the timelines for the survey (Dates) 2. CCPM Survey • The cluster coordinator completed a Cluster Description Report online. • The cluster coordinator and cluster partners each completed separate online questionnaires as well (Dates) • The Global Nutrition Cluster compiled and analysed the survey results and produced a Cluster Description Report and Preliminary Coordination Performance Report. These two were shared with partners (Dates).

  3. Next Steps for the CCPM 3. Cluster analysis and action planning • In a half a day meeting, the cluster will discuss and finalize the Cluster Description Report and Coordination Performance Report, and develop an Action Plan. 4. Follow-up and Monitoring • The Cluster Strategic Advisory Group will continually review the Final Coordination Performance Report and Action Plan. • The Coordination Performance Report and Action Plan will be presented to the HCT and global cluster, to identify support requirements. • The cluster will continue to monitor the implementation of its Action Plan at regular intervals. 5. Ideally, the cluster should report to the HCT on the progress every quarter.

  4. Response rate among partners

  5. Scores and Colour Coding

  6. 1. Supporting Service Delivery

  7. 2. Informing strategic decision-making of the HC/HCT for the humanitarian response

  8. 3. Planning and strategy development

  9. 4. Advocacy

  10. 5. Monitoring and reporting

  11. 6. Contingency planning/preparedness.

  12. 7. Accountability to affected population

  13. Group Work The team will divide into seven groups to:- • Discuss and if necessary amend the Cluster Description Report. • Contextualize the findings of the Preliminary Coordination Performance Report (narrative comment boxes). • For each of the seven cluster functions identify actions for improvements • On the basis of these discussions, a Final Cluster Description Report and Final Coordination Performance Report will be produced.

  14. Group work: each group should • Review and amend the Cluster Description as relevant to the function assigned to the group • Review the performance status of the function (color coded in green/yellow/orange/red, and the more detailed scoring of the various questions related to the function) • Identify what worked well for that function • Discuss possible constraints as well as support requirements for that function • Identify other issues relevant to cluster performance that were not included in the survey • Identify and prioritize any improvements for that function • Add inputs from the plenary feedback

  15. Plenary discussion • The groups should report back in plenary (15 min each); • Seek feedback and endorsement on the recommendations from each of the working groups for each of the functions • Jointly agree on up to 5priority follow-up actions to improve performance of any weak core functions (prioritize recommendations, but at least address all functions that are below satisfactory performance). • Identify who should be tasked with following up on each recommended improvement action and by when. It is important to allocate responsibilities at the meeting. • Identify opportunities, constraints and/or request support, if needed.

More Related