1 / 16

Thin Liquid Pb Wall Protection for IFE Chambers

This study presents results and simulations of vaporization and condensation calculations for a thin liquid wall (1mm Pb) chamber in inertial fusion energy (IFE) systems. The results indicate that the chambers recover before the next shot, assuming a 5Hz repetition rate.

ebuell
Download Presentation

Thin Liquid Pb Wall Protection for IFE Chambers

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Thin liquid Pb wall protection for IFE chambers D. A. Haynes, Jr. and R. R. Peterson Fusion Technology Institute ARIES-IFE, January 2002, 1

  2. Summary/Outline We present results from vaporization and preliminary condensation calculations. BUCKY simulations are presented for the ~400MJ closely coupled HIB target and the laser direct-drive NRL target (160MJ) in a thin liquid wall (1mm Pb) chamber. For chambers with radii of 4.5m and 6.5m, and a starting chamber pressure of 1mTorr, these preliminary results indicate that the chambers recover before the next shot, assuming a 5Hz rep. rate. • Brief review of relevant processes and examples of BUCKY simulation of them. • Vaporization results • Preliminary condensation results • Future work ARIES-IFE, January 2002, 2

  3. Target Output Simulations (BUCKY, etc) Target Disassembly Energy Partition Liquid Dynamics Simulations (BUCKY) X-ray Deposition Vaporization Self-Shielding Shocks in Liquid Chamber Recovery Simulations (1-D: BUCKY, 2, 3-D TSUNAMI, ?) Re-condensation, Substrate Survival X-rays, Ion Debris, Neutrons Vapor Mass Impulse Rep-Rate Target Design Low T, Hi r Opacity Wall Design Liquid Properties Beam Transport Criteria Vapor Opacity Wetted-Wall Chamber Physics Critical Issues Involve Target Output, and First Wall Response ARIES-IFE, January 2002, 3

  4. We have obtained or generated relevant Pb properties • Thermal properties linked by ARIES web site • http://www.efunda.com/materials/elements/element_info.cfm?Element_ID=Pb • Tmelt = 601K • Tvap = 2022K • Qvap = 866.31 J/g • Heat capacity = 141.9 J/kg-K (@600K) • Thermal conductivity = 31.4 W/m-K (@600K) • Cold attenuation coefficients from Biggs and Lighthill • EOS and Opacity for Pb calculated using FTI’s UTAOPA ARIES-IFE, January 2002, 4

  5. 1 After prompt x-rays from target strike the condensate, superheated vapor zones are created at high temperatures and densities As the vapor cools, zones re-condense, Leaving the hydridynamic mesh and re-joining the condensate As the newly vaporized zones move out into the chamber, radiating and absorbing target ions The heat and radiation from the newly created vapor zones further vaporizes the condensate Initial condition (pre-shot) 2 3 4 5 BUCKY divides the mesh into two types of zones, vapor zones which participate in the hydrodynamic motion, and condensate zones which do not move. As vaporization/condensation occurs, zones are dynamically reclassified. Condensate Vapor ARIES-IFE, January 2002, 5

  6. Of the two targets considered here, the HIB target is considerably more threatening ARIES-IFE, January 2002, 6

  7. t ~ 1-10 ns Vapor rapidly moves off of surface Target x-rays are rapidly deposited in the protecting liquid. Impulse launches shocks that might damage substrate and/or splash liquid. Target x-ray deposition, initial vaporization, and shock • 4.5m radius, HIB target in 1mm Pb thin liquid wall protected chamber, Tcool=600C: • The prompt x-rays heat the 1mTorr Pb gas to high temperatures and high ionization stages (~100eV at center of chamber). • Of the 119MJ of target x-rays, 9MJ are deposited volumetrically in the liquid, and approximately 110MJ vaporize and ionize the first 4.6 microns (11.6kg) of Pb (vapor is heated to 10s of eV). • Peak shock loading (over-pressure) of 1.5e4 J/cm3 occurs during this time. ARIES-IFE, January 2002, 7

  8. Comparison of target x-ray spectra and Pb attenuation lengths 95% of the HIB target’s x-ray energy is emitted at energies where the attenuation length is less than 1 micron. ARIES-IFE, January 2002, 8

  9. Snapshot: 4.5m radius chamber, HIB target, 10ns Chamber gas (including blow-off from wall) conditions vary by many orders of magnitude 10ns after the target goes off. ARIES-IFE, January 2002, 9

  10. t ~ 1-10 ms Debris Ions are stopped in vapor and the energy is re-radiated, some of it going to the liquid causing more vaporization. Target ions are mostly stopped in the vapor, with only the most energetic particles reaching the liquid. • 4.5m radius, HIB target in 1mm Pb thin liquid wall protected chamber, Tcool=600C: • Of the 22MJ of energy in target ions, only 5.3 MJ are deposited in the wall, penetrating 0.646mm into the liquid. • The remaining 16.7MJ of target ion energy is deposited in the chamber gas and the vaporized liquid. As the energy is re-radiated, the total vaporized mass increases to 20.94kg. • By 10s, the target chamber gas and vapor have cooled to 1.4eV and less than 0.2eV, respectively. ARIES-IFE, January 2002, 10

  11. For the 4.5m radius chamber with a thin Pb liquid wall, and the HIB target at around 100s, shock fronts from target blast and interact, and blind continuation of 1-d simulation results deserves skepticism. • Plan of attack: • “Homogenize” chamber, converting bulk kinetic energy into thermal energy. • Start condensation run from these conditions. • Geometry dependent uncertainty: how long does it take to homogenize, and will there be any x-ray pulse produced by stagnation on axis? ARIES-IFE, January 2002, 11

  12. t ~ 1-100 ms Vapor atoms migrate towards Knudsen layer at thermal velocity Condensation occurs as vapor atoms transit the Knudsen layer, which becomes filled with non-condensable gas. Preliminary modeling of the condensation phase (no effects from non-condensable target ions trapped in gas or vapor, lack of self-consistency between starting vapor pressure (1mTorr) and final vapor pressure) ARIES-IFE, January 2002, 12

  13. t ~ 100-500 ms Protecting liquid is re-established. Vapor density and temperature are suitable for beam transport and target injection Re-establishment of conditions suitable for target injection • We need to decide on the parameters space in which we want to identify operating windows, and what constitutes an acceptable design: • Target Output • Driver/Transport Method • Radius • Liquid • Wall temperature ARIES-IFE, January 2002, 13

  14. To obtain consistent chamber (pre-shot and post-condensation), the simplest “knob” is the temperature at the back of the thin liquid. • In BUCKY, the vaporization and condensation rates are calculated using the kinetic theory model described by Labuntsov and Kryukov (Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 22, 989 (1979). • Vaporization rate is proportional to the saturation vapor pressure, which depends strongly on Tvap,0/Tcondensate. • Condensation rate depends on vapor pressure of condensable material in the chamber. ARIES-IFE, January 2002, 14

  15. Summary of these preliminary results • 1mm thick Pb liquid wall, starting Pb vapor density 1mTorr, all ions are stopped within chamber or within liquid • HIB target • 4.5m chamber radius • Amount of material vaporized: 21.4kg • Maximum over-pressure: 1.4861E+04 (J/cm3) • Time (post-homogenization) to reach vapor equilibrium: 0.15s (600C Tcool, 0.2mTorr) • 6.5m chamber radius • Amount of material vaporized: 38.5kg • Maximum over-pressure: 8.7121E+03 (J/cm3) • Time (post-homogenization) to reach vapor equilibrium: 0.2s (600C Tcool, 0.2mTorr), 0.15s (685C Tcool, 1.4mTorr) • NRL160 target • 4.5m chamber radius • Amount of material vaporized: 9.2kg • Maximum over-pressure: 1.7767E+03 (J/cm3) ARIES-IFE, January 2002, 15

  16. Conclusions/Summary • 1mm of liquid Pb protects permanent target chamber structures from x-ray and ion loads with a 1mTorr initial chamber gas pressure. We will investigate the effects of higher pressures before the next ARIES meeting • Chamber conditions are re-established by 0.2s after homogenization. How long does that homogenization take? The transit time for the shock waves from the target and the flash vaporization is on the order of a few tenths of a millisecond. Are 5 of these periods enough? Are 1000 needed? Experiment or higher dimensional simulations may be required if the latter is more likely than the former. • A self-consistent chamber pressure pre- and post-shot can be attempted to be achieved by varying Tcool. • These results are preliminary. I’d like to benchmark the condensation part of the code with experiment, or at least with CONRAD, and also take into account the effects any non-condensable target material left in the chamber, and the thermal properties of the equilibrium liquid composition. We present results from vaporization and preliminary condensation BUCKY simulations are presented for the ~400MJ closely coupled HIB target and the laser direct-drive NRL target (160MJ) in a thin liquid wall (1mm Pb) chamber. For chambers with radii of 4.5m and 6.5m, and a starting chamber pressure of 1mTorr, these preliminary results indicate that the chambers recover before the next shot, assuming a 5Hz rep. rate. ARIES-IFE, January 2002, 16

More Related