地理資訊系統在賽局理論模式之衝突分析運用於水庫集水區管理
Download
1 / 9

地理資訊系統在賽局理論模式之衝突分析運用於水庫集水區管理 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 100 Views
  • Uploaded on

地理資訊系統在賽局理論模式之衝突分析運用於水庫集水區管理. 指導老師:李志賢 班級:四環四 A 學生:陳百祺 陳玠吟 李兆玉 賴建翰. 前言.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' 地理資訊系統在賽局理論模式之衝突分析運用於水庫集水區管理' - eben


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

地理資訊系統在賽局理論模式之衝突分析運用於水庫集水區管理地理資訊系統在賽局理論模式之衝突分析運用於水庫集水區管理

指導老師:李志賢

班級:四環四A

學生:陳百祺

陳玠吟

李兆玉

賴建翰


前言地理資訊系統在賽局理論模式之衝突分析運用於水庫集水區管理

  • GIS賽局理論模式(GIS-base Game-theory Model, GGM)是應用賽局理論,結合多目標優化和地理資訊系統以及衛星圖像,是制定決策過程中為平衡經濟和環境的矛盾於水庫集水區管理。

  • 在這項研究中,賽局理論是用來作為替代的戰略分析工具的經濟發展之間的相互作用和環境保護在流域管理。結果表明,分析經濟和環境平衡的流域管理範圍內可以很容易地解釋,以幫助決策者的流域管理。相比之下,傳統的多目標分析方法在決策過程中的困難。在賽局理論中的應用進一步討論。




  • 據我們所知,使用賽局理論從來沒有表現在流域管理中,一個需要平衡的據我們所知,使用賽局理論從來沒有表現在流域管理中,一個需要平衡的經濟發展(EcoD)和環境保護(EnvP)。因此,本研究是利用賽局理論為決策者提供一個明確的選擇,在選擇適當的替代平衡EcoD和EnvP。由於流域管理需要事先了解有關土地利用類型,地理資訊系統(GIS)是用於識別和空間組織的地理數據的土地使用方式於選定的分水嶺。

  • 結果基於 GIS的賽局理論模式(GGM)的流域管理可能會進一步擴大應用賽局理論在水資源領域。相比之下,傳統的多目標的方法被用來對比容易和方便使用所取得的成果從 GGM分析。


文獻回顧據我們所知,使用賽局理論從來沒有表現在流域管理中,一個需要平衡的

  • 賽局理論是初始化的開拓性工作的Neumann 和Morgenstern。賽局理論是一種數學工具,用於分析和解決分配問題,各種矛盾和利益平衡。包括球員的衝突誰選擇不同的戰略,從一組可用的戰略。從應用的角度來看,賽局理論是數學模式的戰略互動,也是一個互動的決策過程,試圖找出最佳的戰略,幾名球員之間的平衡作出選擇誰的利益,影響其他選手。


  • 賽局理論已經應用於多種領域,包括經濟、社會科學和水資源賽局理論已經應用於多種領域,包括經濟、社會科學和水資源; 水資源系統建模在解決衝突問題;分配的水權等。不幸的是,小衝突定量分析水資源的表現,以確定是有希望的戰略和解決方案的相關利益相關者。

  • 然而,定性分析,Suzuki 和Nakayama討論了水覆蓋農業和城市用地的地區分配每個通過使用遊戲的不合作。Bogardi 和 Szidarovszky報告說,面對複雜的水資源系統,如國際問題上,傳統的編程工具可能會失敗,但賽局理論組成的各種技術和社會,經濟問題可能是一個富有成果的工具。


參考文獻賽局理論已經應用於多種領域,包括經濟、社會科學和水資源

  • Bogardi, I., Szidarovszky, F., 1976. Application of game theory in water management. Applied Mathematical Modelling 1, 16-20.

  • Bruckmeier, K., 2005. Interdisciplinary conflict analysis and conflict mitigation in local resource management. Ambio 34(2), 65-73.

  • Camerer, C.F., 1997. Progress in behavioral game theory. Journal of Economic Perspectives 11(4), 167-188.

  • Chang, N.-B., Chen, H.-W., Jeng, K.-Y., Ning, S.-K., Lee, C.-S., 2001. Evaluating of non-point source loads in the reservoir watershed using the GIS/GPS/RS information technologies and numerical models. Water International 26(2), 239-251.

  • Cohon, J.L., 1978. Multiobjective Programming and Planning. Academic Press: San Diego.

  • Council of Agriculture, 2009. Cost and Benefit of Agricultural Products. http://www.coa.gov.tw/view.php?catid=17759, Taipei. (in Chinese)

  • Davila, E., Chang, N.-B., Diwakaruni, S., 2005. Landfill space consumption dynamics in the Lower Rio Grande Valley by grey integer programming-based games. Journal of Environmental Management 75, 353-365.

  • Dhingra, A.K., Rao, S.S., 1995. A cooperative fuzzy game theoretical approach to multiple objective design optimization. European Journal of Operational Research 83, 547-567.

  • Dinar, A., Ratner, A., Yaron, D., 1992. Evaluating cooperative game theory in water resources. Theory and Decision 32(1), 1-20.

  • Fronza, G., Karlin, A., Renaldi, S., 1977. Reservoir operation under conflicting objectives. Water Resources Research 13(2), 296-302.

  • Heaney, J.P., Dickinson, R.E., 1982. Methods for apportioning the cost of a water resources project. Water Resources Research 18(3), 476-482.

  • Hwang, C.-L., Masud, A.S.M., 1979. Multiple Objective Decision Making. Springer-Verlag: Berlin.

  • Leach, W.D., Pelkey, N.W., Sabatier, P.A., 2002. Stakeholder partnerships as collaborative policymaking: evaluation criteria applied to watershed management in California and Washington. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 21(4), 645-670.


  • Lee, C.-S., Wen, C.-G., 1996. 賽局理論已經應用於多種領域,包括經濟、社會科學和水資源Application of multiobjective programming to water quality management in a river basin. Journal of Environmental Management 47, 11-26.

  • Lee, C.-S., Chang, S.-P., 2005. Interactive fuzzy optimization for an economic and environmental balance in a river system. Water Research 39, 221-231.

  • Lund, J.R., Palmer, R.N., 1997. Water resource system modeling for conflict resolution. Water Resources Update 3(108), 70-82.

  • Myerson, R.B., 1992. On the value of game theory in social science. Rationality and Society 4(1), 62-73.

  • Shields, D.J., Tolwinski, B., Kent, B.M., 1999. Models for conflict resolution in ecosystem management. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 33, 61-84.

  • Suzuki, M., Nakayama, M., 1976. The cost assignment of the cooperative water resource development: a game theoretical approach. Management Science 22(10), 1081-1086.

  • Von Neumann, J., Morgenstern, O., 1947. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton University Press: Princeton.

  • Wang, L., Fang, L., Hipel, K.W., 2003. Cooperative water resources allocation based on equitable water rights. IEEE Conference, 4425-4430.

  • Water Resources Council, 1973. Principles and standards for planning water and related resources, Federal Registration. 38 (174), Part III, 24,77,24,869, 10 September.

  • Wen, C.-G., Lee, C.-S., 1998. A neural network approach to multiobjective optimization for water quality management in a river basin. Water Resources Research 34(2), 427-436.

  • Wen, C.-G., Kuo, J.-T., Chang, S.-P., Lee, C.-S., Chung, S.-M., 2003. Water Quality Investigation and Improvement for Tseng-Wen Reservoir. Research Report of Southern Taiwan Water Resources Bureau, MOEA, Tainan. (in Chinese)

  • Wen, C.-G., Kao, M.-M., Lin, J.-F., Chang, S.-P., Lee, C.-S., 2005. Removing Nutrient Sources for Reservoir Watershed by Using Ecological Engineering Approaches. Research Report of EPA, EPA-94-J1-02-09-06, Taipei. (in Chinese)


ad