1 / 22

Policy by Design: Virginia’s NOx Allowance Auction

Policy by Design: Virginia’s NOx Allowance Auction. D. Porter, S. Rassenti, B. Shobe, V. Smith, and A. Winn June 20, 2005. Why is this interesting?. First time allowances sold for revenue Innovative auction designs Experimental comparisons of auctions Implementation Timing

Download Presentation

Policy by Design: Virginia’s NOx Allowance Auction

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Policy by Design: Virginia’s NOx Allowance Auction D. Porter, S. Rassenti, B. Shobe, V. Smith, and A. Winn June 20, 2005

  2. Why is this interesting? • First time allowances sold for revenue • Innovative auction designs • Experimental comparisons of auctions • Implementation • Timing • Bureaucratic issues • Broker’s issues

  3. NOx allowances • Nineteen state regional market • Allowances have vintages • Use on or after vintage year • ’04 and ‘05 had 1,855 allowances in the set-aside • At prevailing prices, vintages would earn about $9 million • Allowances may be banked at a risk • Subject to “progressive flow control” or discounting if total stock of banked allowances rises above 10% of total allowances

  4. Criteria for successful auction • Maximize revenues for the state • Auction must be completed by June 30 • Fair, understandable, and transparent auction process

  5. Results of initial design work • Initial evaluation suggests 3 auction types for evaluation: • Combinatorial sealed-bid • Combinatorial English clock auction • Sequential English clock

  6. Combinatorial sealed bids • For the combinatorial sealed bid • “Any/Or” (AO) bids • Bids take the form: (p4,Q4 | p5,Q5) • Which includes any linear combination: • q4 ≤ Q4; • q5 ≤ (1-)Q 5; • 0 ≤  ≤ 1

  7. Combinatorial sealed bids - 2 • For example, the bid (100, 10| 90, 20) could result in: • Q4 = 10 or Q5 = 20 or any linear combination such as • 4 units of 2004 ( =.4) and 12 units of 2005 for (1- =.6) • Revenue is maximized by solving an integer programming problem in Q4, Q5 , and ij

  8. The “English clock” • Seller has many units to sell • Seller announces price, bidders announce quantity • Start at low price where demand is high • Increase price at set periods • Stop when demand equals supply • Sell all allowances at ending price

  9. Advantages of the clock • Quick and easy to implement • Reduces political risk • Does not reveal WTP of high-value bidder

  10. Combinatorial English clock • Bidders bid on 2 clocks simultaneously • Clock increases for any vintage in excess demand • Bidders may switch quantities between vintages subject to some limits • When both clocks stop, revenue maximizing bids are selected by algorithm

  11. Sequential English clock • Sell one vintage in morning and one in afternoon • Each by standard English clock • Does the order make a difference?

  12. Experimental results - revenue • Both clocks beat CSB with elas. demand • CEC does a little better than SEC • Clocks fair worse with inelastic demand • Differences in vintage prices does not affect relative performance of CEC and SEC • For SEC, order of auction does not matter • External market probably implies elasticity

  13. Auction timeline • As of mid-April,time pressure appeared to rule out all but the simple sealed bid. • RFP for auction brokerage services published May 17 • Responses were due on May 27 • Contract was signed on June 8 • Auction was held on June 24 • Light-speed for a state bureaucracy!!

  14. The winning brokerage bid • No mention of clock auctions in the RFP • Credible bids from five firms • All could do a sealed bid • Amerex proposed an English clock auction • This was a surprise as the ICES work had not been publicized. • Virginia chose the risky path to maximize revenue from the auction

  15. Sixteen days • 5 days of intense discussion on design detail • Sequential versus joint auction of vintages • Single price or discriminatory pricing • How to select winning bids • Auction design finalized on June 14

  16. Programming and paperwork • Programming the Internet application • Writing contract • Contacting potential buyers • Getting contracts approved • Arranging financial assurance • Bond ratings, escrow, or letters of credit • Bids limited to credit amounts

  17. The auction - bidders • Bidders see only two things • The current price • That the auction is still open • Bidders enter only quantity bid • Bidding early is important because winning bids are filled in order received • Must bid each round to stay in • Can’t increase bid in later rounds

  18. The auction - seller • Announce schedule of rounds • Time for bidding; time for posting new round • Stay in touch with bidders • When quantity bid falls below quantity to sell, auction ends • Seller chooses top price or next price down to maximize revenues

  19. Price paid • Bidders at top price get goods at seller’s chosen price • Even if next to last price is chosen • If final price drops down, additional quantity is sold in time order of bids • Bidders who drop quantity in last round may get some units at their last bid price

  20. Auction results: 2004 vintage • Number for sale: 1,855 • 19 bidders, 10 winners • Day before the auction: • Bid: $2,200; Ask: $2,350 • Morning of auction over-the-counter sale: $2,250 per ton • Auction clearing price: $2,325 • 3.3% over morning trade price!

  21. Auction results: 2005 vintage • Number for sale: 1,855 • 17 bidders, 5 winners • Day before auction: • Bid: $3,150; Ask: $3,200 • Morning of auction over-the-counter sales: $3,200 per ton • Auction clearing price: $3,425 • 7% over the morning trade price!

  22. Revenue exceeds expectations • Total auction revenue: $10,666,250 • Auction expenses: under $200,000 • Including one-time research costs • Net revenue: $10,466,250

More Related