1 / 22

# Conceptual thinking about the unknown - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Conceptual thinking about the unknown. Uncertainty: expected value, sensitivity analysis, and the value of information. Review 1. Your problem is not as unique as you think it is You have more data than you think you have You need less data than you think you need

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

### Conceptual thinking about the unknown

Uncertainty: expected value, sensitivity analysis, and the value of information

• Your problem is not as unique as you think it is

• You have more data than you think you have

• You need less data than you think you need

• There is a useful measure that is much simpler than you think it is

• If it matters, it is detectable/observable

• If it can be detected, it can be detected as an amount (or range of possible amounts)

• If it can be detected as a range of possible amounts, it can be measured

• Write down a number

• Break it down into pieces (decomposition)

• Try different decompositions

• Average

• What is the decision this is supposed to support?

• What really is the thing being measured?

• Why does this thing matter to the decision?

• What do you know about it now?

• What is the value of knowing more?

There are two extremes of subjective confidence:

Over confidence

Under confidence

• Uncertainty = The lack of complete certainty. That is, more than one outcome is possible, so that the true outcome/SON/result/value is not known

• Risk = uncertainty involving hazard. That is, some outcomes are bad, involve a loss, or where they are all bad, some are catastrophic

• Consists of modeling uncertainty as a set of contingencies that are exhaustive and mutually exclusive with specific probabilities of occurrence.

• In practice, this means the analyst identifies representative contingencies and assigns probabilities to each of them so that they sum to one.

• The probabilities can be based on historically observed frequencies, subjective assessments, or experts (based on information, theory, or both).

• Calculate the net benefits of each contingency

• Multiply by that contingency's probability of occurrence.

• Sum the weighted benefits

E(NB) = SPi (Bi - Ci)

Specification ofcontingencies

Decision analysis has two stages.

• First, one specifies the logical structure of the decision problem in terms of sequences of decisions and realizations of contingencies using a diagram (called a decision tree) that links an initial decision to final outcomes.

• Second, one works backwards from final outcomes to the initial decision, calculating expected values of net benefits across contingencies and pruning dominated branches (ones with lower expected values of net benefits).

• Present value of expected net benefits of the vaccination program is simply E(CNV) - E(CV) (i.e., the expected value of the costs when not implementing the program minus the expected costs when implementing the program).

Total Population (round to 10K)

Fraction High Risk ?

Infection Rate ?

Mortality Rate ?

Value of Life ?

Time lost to Flu ?

Opportunity Cost of Time ?

Chance of Epidemic

First Year ?

Second Year ?

Total number of people vaccinated

Vaccination Rate

Dose Price (Variable)

Herd Immunity Rate ?

Vaccine Effectiveness Rate?

Discount Rate ?

What’s up for grabs?

• What are our maximum downside risks if we take no action?

• What if we do?

• Perfect information?

• Imperfect information?

• Quasi-option value