1 / 32

Institutional Portals and the PORTAL project

Institutional Portals and the PORTAL project. Paul Miller 25 April 2003. Institutional Background. Hull’s Digital University Project Planned over summer of 2001 Initially developing student version of staff intranet Supplemented by JISC-funded PORTAL project. See www.digital.hull.ac.uk/.

dustin-moon
Download Presentation

Institutional Portals and the PORTAL project

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Institutional Portals and the PORTAL project Paul Miller 25 April 2003

  2. Institutional Background • Hull’s Digital University Project • Planned over summer of 2001 • Initially developing student version of staff intranet • Supplemented by JISC-funded PORTAL project. See www.digital.hull.ac.uk/

  3. Timescales • Digital University Project planned • (Summer 2001) • Portal Procurement & CMS Development • (Autumn 2001) • Pilot of port.hull portal • (Autumn 2002) • JISC-funded PORTAL project • (September 2002 – February 2004) • Portal goes live to all staff & students • (September 2003)

  4. The Portal in Context “a [thin] layer which aggregates, integrates, personalises and presents information, transactions and applications to the user according to their role and preferences.” See www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue30/portal/ See www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue33/portals/

  5. The Portal in Context [2] • Aggregating and Integrating… • Core corporate data • The institution’s web space (with CMS help!) • Web based mail • Library Systems • Existing Staff Intranet • Virtual Learning Environments • JISC’s Information Environment + (with PORTAL) • New Services for a New Organisation…

  6. REMEMBER : A portal is not the only way in!

  7. PORTAL • Presenting natiOnal Resources To Audiences Locally • Funded by the JISC’s FAIR Programme • 18 Month project, from September 2002 • University of Hull and UKOLN • Surfacing national content and services • Understanding user needs • Addressing content provider issues

  8. National Content and Services • There is a lot of quality-assured content out there • JISC, and others, spend a lot of money on procurement, construction, marketing and support • awareness and use are low • users are confused by blurry distinctions between VLEs, digital libraries, national and institutional portals, course web sites… • can a standards-compliant, inclusive, institutional portal raise awareness, increase take-up, join up some silos, and deliver an enriched and value-added learner experience ? J J L L J/L

  9. See uk.jstor.org/

  10. See www.rdn.ac.uk/

  11. See ads.ahds.ac.uk/catalogue/

  12. See www.nelh.nhs.uk/

  13. A plethora of content • A lot of URLs • A lot of interfaces • A lot of duplication • Resources too broad ? • A real danger of things falling through cracks • Surely no one can be bothered, so let’s just Google it…

  14. Can the portal help… ? We certainly hope so! • Bring a lot of these sources into a single place • Use what we know to offer what we think people want • The power of the institutional portal; student records, HR databases, etc. • Extract key services from the fluff • Don’t just point to someone else’s web site.

  15. In search of answers • How do we sort all this stuff? • How do we select and refine from the mass? • Good metadata, but not just at our end! • How do we reach functions rather than web pages? • What happens when you integrate things that were designed to stand alone?.

  16. Understanding User Needs • Ongoing process • Online survey, focus groups, interviews… See www.fair-portal.hull.ac.uk/deliverables.html now See www.ariadne.ac.uk/ around the end of April!

  17. What users want… Further Education Students: Review marks Library admin Deadline alerts Careers info Teaching materials Postgraduate Students: Library admin Search favourite resources Deadline alerts Library & Internet resource alert Access reading lists Higher Education Undergrad: Deadline alerts Review marks Library admin Teaching materials Search favourite resources HE Staff: Search favourite resources Personal information = 2nd Library admin =2nd University e-mail Library & Internet resource alert Forms & documentation

  18. …and what they don’t û • The weather !

  19. Content Providers • Not always keen to ‘let go’ • Not yet persuaded of the benefits • Perceived loss of brand • Need to bring traffic to their sites • Ageing systems, not necessarily equipped to syndicate effectively • WSRP 1.0 still coming real soon… See www.ariadne.ac.uk/ around the end of April!

  20. Obstacles • Institutional readiness • Changing institutional culture & process redevelopment • Technology • Significant legacy issues • CMS/VLE: overfeatured, overpriced, and closed • Digital Library Systems: ditto! • Readiness of external sites to disclose data or services rather than web pages • Shifting set of ‘standards’.

  21. Risks • “Don’t like it, won’t use it” • Stakeholder survey work from PORTAL informs development • “Bad data, Bad portal” • Risks in exposing faulty institutional processes • When the previously hidden is made visible, the anger/disappointment with dodgy content in back-end systems will be directed at the presentation layer every time.. • “Will it sort my network connection out?” • Managing expectations • Staff Development open sessions • Dissemination activities

  22. Conclusion • The portal aggregates, integrates, personalises and presents • Nothing more! • Content Management and reconsidered back-end processes are key • Users need to be involved • Stakeholders need to be brought on board • We need to avoid repeating the mess, misinformation, duplication and multiple interfaces of the Web in the portal.

  23. PORTALPresenting natiOnal Resources To Audiences Locally p.miller@ukoln.ac.uk

More Related