E N D
1. ‘Valence’ politics A.k.a. ‘performance’ or ‘delivery’ politics
Agreement about ends
Competition about who’s best to achieve them
Key issues: economy, crime, education, NHS
Key variables:
Past records
Perceptions of competence
Party image
Leaders
2. Context I – ideological convergence
3. Context II: volatility between elections
4. Context III: ‘disloyalty’ to party
5. Context IV – attributions of responsibility
6. Overall performance evaluations
7. ‘Most important issue’
8. Specific issue evaluations
9. Economy and vote
10. Leader evaluations
11. Campaign evaluations
12. Factors significantly predicting choice
13. Factors significant for neither vote Gender
Newspaper readership
Social class (objective or subjective)
Religion
National identity
Left-right & libertarian-authoritarian issue stances
Preferred local taxation
Attitudes to Trident
Evaluations of Labour performance at Westminster
Party best able to handle crime or public services
Evaluations of McConnell and Salmond
14. So why did the SNP win? Enough voters unimpressed with Labour Holyrood performance
SNP persuaded enough voters it would do better (and not far behind on the economy)
Party seen as gradualist > fundamentalist
(But nowhere else for hardcore pro-independence voters to go)
Campaigned positively and trusted to govern in Scotland’s interests
Labour’s campaign negative, maybe too Westminster-flavoured
15. And why was it so close? More Labour party identifiers
SNP still repels hardcore anti-independence
Plenty positively evaluated Labour’s Holyrood performance
And plenty doubted whether SNP would do better (especially on the economy)
Labour not severely punished for
Negative evaluations of Westminster govt
Council tax
Leadership disadvantage