1 / 23

A theory of music cognition Day 4

A theory of music cognition Day 4. Music Cognition MUSC 495.02, NSCI 466, NSCI 710.03 Harry Howard Barbara Jazwinski Tulane University. Course administration. Spend provost's money. A theory of music cognition. What question should a theory of music cognition answer?.

duke
Download Presentation

A theory of music cognition Day 4

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. A theory of music cognitionDay 4 Music Cognition MUSC 495.02, NSCI 466, NSCI 710.03 Harry Howard Barbara Jazwinski Tulane University

  2. Course administration • Spend provost's money Music Cognition - Jazwinski & Howard - Tulane University

  3. A theory of music cognition

  4. What question should a theory of music cognition answer? • It's not a rhetorical question. Take a few minutes to discuss it with someone. • Some answers I've found, with no pretence to authority: • What happens when I hear music? • How do I hear music? • What y'all have said • how does the brain perceive and interact with music? • what is music; what is cognition? • how does the brain differentiate between music, language, and noise • course objectives • how does the brain interpret the external stimuli of music and process it into something meaningful? • how does the brain integrate all the parts of music? Music Cognition - Jazwinski & Howard - Tulane University

  5. My answerdrawn from language cognition • What will the next note be? • Advantages • It joins perception and production • What is the next note that I will hear? • What is the next note that I will play? • It is easy to verify • It is easy to quantify • Disadvantages • It ignores the emotional content of the next note • What will the next note be, and will I like it? Music Cognition - Jazwinski & Howard - Tulane University

  6. This is a question of predictionHere's an example • Sitting in my living room, I hear my wife call "mail’s here!" from the next room, and within a few seconds I am heading toward the front door to retrieve the day’s offerings from the mailbox. • But what just happened? • Take a few minutes to discuss what just happened with a friend. Music Cognition - Jazwinski & Howard - Tulane University

  7. What just happened • A pattern of sound energy impacted my ears, which I decoded as the words "mail’s here" spoken by my wife. • I infer • that there is mail waiting for me, • that I am being given an oblique instruction to pick it up, • and that there is indeed something worth picking up. Music Cognition - Jazwinski & Howard - Tulane University

  8. But none of these inferential leaps is infallible • It is possible • that the words spoken were not "mail’s here", but "Mel’s here" – an unexpected visit from our neighbor Mel; • or that, although something did indeed come through our mail slot, it was not the U.S. mail but a flyer from a local restaurant; • or that the mail has been delivered, but is nothing but junk (the most likely possibility); • or that my wife simply said "mail’s here" as an informational update, and has already gone to pick up the mail herself. • My pondering of the situation reflects all of these uncertainties, and the complex interactions between them. • If I don’t actually have a neighbor named Mel, for example, then the probability that my wife said "Mel’s here" is decreased. Music Cognition - Jazwinski & Howard - Tulane University

  9. The next note • But a moment later, these dilemmas are largely resolved. • I hear a louder, clearer, more insistent "The mail is here!" from my wife, • which clarifies • both the words that were spoken • and the intent behind them – she does expect me to get the mail. • (Whether the mail contains anything worth getting remains to be discovered.) Music Cognition - Jazwinski & Howard - Tulane University

  10. The moral • This everyday situation captures several important things about the probabilistic nature of thought and perception. • Perception is a multi-leveled inferential process • Probabilistic judgments are shaped by our past experience • Producers of communication are sensitive to its probabilistic and fallible nature, and may adjust their behavior accordingly Music Cognition - Jazwinski & Howard - Tulane University

  11. Perception is a multi-leveled inferential process • Levels of knowledge in the story • I hear sounds, • infer words from them, • infer my wife’s intended message from the words (and from the way she said them), • and make further inferences about the state of the world. • Each of these levels of knowledge contains some uncertainty, which may endure in my mind • even heading for the door, I may be uncertain as to what my wife said. • As such, they lend themselves very naturally to a probabilistic treatment, where propositions are represented • not in true-or-false terms • but in levels of probability. Music Cognition - Jazwinski & Howard - Tulane University

  12. Probabilistic judgments are shaped by our past experience • That is, by our observation of events in the world. • In judging the likelihood • that my wife wants me to get the mail, • or that the mail (not Mel) is at the door, • or that it contains something besides junk, • I am influenced by the frequency of these various events happening in the past. Music Cognition - Jazwinski & Howard - Tulane University

  13. Sensitivity to probability • My wife knew that I had not fully gotten her message the first time, • and thus re-conveyed both the words and the intention in an amplified form. Music Cognition - Jazwinski & Howard - Tulane University

  14. Relevance for music cognition • Let me rephrase the principles • Perception of music is an uncertain multileveled inferential process. • Knowledge of musical probabilities comes, in large part, from regularities in the musical environment. • Producers of musical communication are sensitive to, and affected by, its probabilistic nature. Music Cognition - Jazwinski & Howard - Tulane University

  15. Perception of music is an uncertain multileveled inferential process • In listening to a piece of music, we hear a pattern of notes and we draw conclusions about the underlying structures that gave rise to those notes • These judgments are often somewhat uncertain; and this uncertainty applies not just at the moment that the judgment is made, but to the way it is represented in memory. • In the development section of a sonata movement, for example, we may be uncertain as to what key we are really in; • this ambiguity is an important part of musical experience. Music Cognition - Jazwinski & Howard - Tulane University

  16. Perception of music is an uncertain multileveled inferential process, 2 • The probabilistic nature of music perception applies not only to these underlying structures, but also to the note pattern itself. • certain note patterns are probable, others are not • our mental representation of these probabilities accounts for important musical phenomena • surprise • tension • expectation • error detection • pitch identification Music Cognition - Jazwinski & Howard - Tulane University

  17. Knowledge of musical probabilities comes from regularities in the musical environment • The probabilities we assign to note patterns and to the structures underlying them are shaped by our musical experience. • Proof of this is seen in the fact that people with different musical backgrounds have different musical expectations, perceptions, and modes of processing and understanding music. • This is not to say • that our musical knowledge is entirely the result of environmental influence, • or that it can be shaped without limit by that environment. Music Cognition - Jazwinski & Howard - Tulane University

  18. Producers of musical communication are sensitive to, and affected by, its probabilistic nature • In many cases, music production is affected by perception, adjusting and evolving to facilitate the perceptual process. • This is reflected • in spontaneous individual choices • for example, with regard to performance expression; • and in the long-term evolution of musical styles and conventions. Music Cognition - Jazwinski & Howard - Tulane University

  19. Source • The story about probability and its relevance for music is taken from pp. 2-3 of Temperley (2007) Music and Probability. • The library has an e-book version of it, so you can view it online. • Note that Temperley does not propose any particular theory of music cognition, except to imply that whatever it is, it is probabilistic. Music Cognition - Jazwinski & Howard - Tulane University

  20. Hypothesis v. 2 • What is the next note probably going to be? • And will I like it? Music Cognition - Jazwinski & Howard - Tulane University

  21. Back to our regularly scheduled program

  22. Ingredients of music cognition mostly receptive, mostly from Levitin Music Cognition - Jazwinski & Howard - Tulane University

  23. Next Monday Perception, §1-2 of Levitin

More Related