1 / 11

Sensitivity Analysis of SST along NJ coast with ADROMS

Sensitivity Analysis of SST along NJ coast with ADROMS. Weifeng (Gordon) Zhang John Wilkin Julia Levin Hernan Arango Institute of Marine and Coastal Sciences, Rutgers University Oct. 2005. Background. Plenty of measurement in New Jersey shore area;

driscoll-duke
Download Presentation

Sensitivity Analysis of SST along NJ coast with ADROMS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Sensitivity Analysis of SST along NJ coast with ADROMS Weifeng (Gordon) Zhang John Wilkin Julia Levin Hernan Arango Institute of Marine and Coastal Sciences, Rutgers University Oct. 2005

  2. Background • Plenty of measurement in New Jersey shore area; • Ocean forecast and hind-cast with forward ROMS has been running; • To use data assimilation in these area to improve the forecast and measurement; • Adjoint sensitivity analysis with ADROMS is applied first to test the model based on our understanding of the physics in this area. • Adjoint sensitivity analysis: What causes the event?

  3. Forward Model–Background for Adjoint model Three idealized cases (steady low river discharge, no tide, no surface exchange): No wind Southwestward wind Northeastward wind

  4. Adjoint sensitivity set-up For upwelling event: Background state: 5 days bi-hourly forward model output. Event time: Adjoint forcing: Adjoint variable: FORWARD_MIXING: Adjoint model reads mixing coefficients from forward output

  5. No wind case

  6. Nowind case (cont’d)

  7. Southward wind case

  8. Southward wind case (cont’d)

  9. Northward wind case

  10. Northward wind case (cont’d)

  11. Summary • ADROMS gives physically reasonable results for sensitivity analysis on idealized application in NJ shore area • Users need to think about the definition of the measure of certain event, J • The validity of linearization to the nonlinear model has to be considered carefully and proved first ______________________________________________________ Great appreciation goes to John Wilkin, Hernan Arango, Julia Levin, Andrew Moore and B-J Choi!

More Related