1 / 12

2006 Small Grain Silage Performance Trial

2006 Small Grain Silage Performance Trial. Objective. A lot of small grain silage grown in the Valley Not much information on variety performance Looked at barley and wheat varieties for silage performance. Site Information. Hosted by Dale Beery and Family Planted: October 19, 2005

drew
Download Presentation

2006 Small Grain Silage Performance Trial

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 2006 Small Grain Silage Performance Trial

  2. Objective • A lot of small grain silage grown in the Valley • Not much information on variety performance • Looked at barley and wheat varieties for silage performance

  3. Site Information • Hosted by Dale Beery and Family • Planted: October 19, 2005 • Pesticide: 1 qt glyphosate October 21 f.b. 0.6 oz Harmony Extra February 10, 2006 • Fertilizer: 50 lb N February 10 f.b. 50 lb N March 28 • Plots: seven rows (7” wide) by 20’ long • Harvested: May 16th, 2006 • Barley: Soft Dough (GS 85) • Wheat: Boot (GS 45)

  4. Warmer January Cooler May Wetter than average fall Dry spring Growing Season SUMMARY: Excellent Small Grain Growing Season!!

  5. The Test: • Seven wheat cultivars: • Coker 9553 • Featherstone 176 • SS MPV 57 • Tribute • V 9412 * • *experimental line

  6. The Test: • Five barley cultivars: • Nomini • Price • Thoroughbred • Doyce • VA01H-68* • *experimental line

  7. The Test: • Five barley cultivars: • Nomini • Price • Thoroughbred • Doyce • VA01H-68* • *experimental line Hulless Cultivars • Grain yields sometimes lower than hulled cultivars • Removing hull = • Higher CP (comparable to wheat) • Lower fiber (comparable to corn) • Higher energy (comparable to corn)

  8. Barley Silage Results • No significant difference in ADF, NDF or TDN between cultivars • Thoroughbred tended to yield more, but not significant

  9. Barley Silage Results • No significant difference in yields, fiber or TDN between cultivars • Both Doyce (hulless) and Nomini (hulled) tended to be lower in CP

  10. Wheat Silage Results • No significant differences in any of the measured areas between cultivars

  11. Small Grain Silage Test Summary • Bottom Line: • Not much difference in performance between cultivars • Not much difference in yield between cultivars • More important to manage harvest timing properly to maximize feed value

  12. ThanksAny Questions?

More Related