Refining the Protocol for a Rapid Assessment Methodology for Wind Development, and Developing a Matrix/Key to Integrate Pre- and Post-construction Monitoring for Commercial Wind Projects Based on Risk. Albert M. Manville, II, Ph.D. Senior Wildlife Biologist
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
Refining the Protocol for a Rapid Assessment Methodology for Wind Development, and Developing a Matrix/Key to Integrate Pre- and Post-construction Monitoringfor Commercial Wind Projects Based on Risk
Albert M. Manville, II, Ph.D.
Senior Wildlife Biologist
Division of Migratory Bird Management, USFWS
4401 N. Fairfax Dr., MBSP-4107
Arlington, VA 22203
Douglas H. Johnson, Ph.D.,
Research Statistician, USGS Northern Prairie
Wildlife Research Center, St. Paul, MN
Edward B. Arnett, Ph.D., Conservation Scientist and
Co-Director of Programs, Bat Conservation International,
Research VII National Wind Coordinating Collaborative Meeting,Session on Cumulative Impacts to Wildlife Habitat and Behavior, We Energies Headquarters, Milwaukee, WI
October 29, 2008
Tools that Need to be Accessed.
1) “red list” of species present with high risk of colliding with turbines based on studies completed to date (e.g., nesting Golden Eagles and migrating tree-dwelling bats),
2) an “orange list” of those species/groups considered to be at moderate risk based on published information, and
3) a “yellow list” of species/groups with a lower score based on a low risk of collision.
Checklist Information should include, but not necessarily be limited to: