William shakespeare s hamlet act v a deconstructive study
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 11

William Shakespeare’s Hamlet Act V : A Deconstructive Study PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 45 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

William Shakespeare’s Hamlet Act V : A Deconstructive Study. Saeid Bayat Pouria Torkamaneh Fall of 2013. Summary.

Download Presentation

William Shakespeare’s Hamlet Act V : A Deconstructive Study

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


William shakespeare s hamlet act v a deconstructive study

William Shakespeare’s HamletAct V : A Deconstructive Study

SaeidBayatPouriaTorkamaneh

Fall of 2013


Summary

Summary

Scene I: Two gravediggers discuss Ophelia's apparent suicide, while digging her grave. Hamlet arrives with Horatio and banters with a gravedigger, who unearths the skull of a jester from Hamlet's childhood, Yorick. Ophelia's funeral procession approaches, led by Laertes. He and Hamlet grapple, but the brawl is broken up.

Scene II: Back at Elsinore, Hamlet tells Horatio how he escaped and that Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are dead. A courtier, Osric, interrupts to invite Hamlet to fence with Laertes. With Fortinbras' army closing on Elsinore, the match begins. Laertes pierces Hamlet with a poisoned blade but is fatally wounded by it himself. Gertrude accidentally drinks poisoned wine intended for Hamlet and dies. In his dying moments, Laertes is reconciled with Hamlet and reveals Claudius's murderous plot. In his own last moments, Hamlet manages to kill Claudius and names Fortinbras as his heir. When Fortinbras arrives, Horatio recounts the tale and Fortinbras orders Hamlet's body borne off in honor.


Deconstructive elements

Deconstructive Elements

  • Negative Theology: Human beings cannot describe in words the essence of the perfect good that is unique to the individual, nor can they define the Divine, in its immense complexity, related to the entire field of reality. As a result, all descriptions if attempted will be ultimately false and conceptualization should be avoided. In fact, it tends to define God based on what God is not, rather than what God is. In another definition, simply put, we can’t give a full stop and absolutism in issues related to religious matters. We cannot verdict what is right or wrong in these realms.

  • Attachment: Any obsessive, excessive, and illogically groundless connection to any firmly centralized ideology, thought, belief, emotion, or tradition, leading to a flawed judgment or failure.


William shakespeare s hamlet act v a deconstructive study

Postal Metaphor: Every time you post a letter,any one of these three can happen next:

  • It will arrive somewhere you intended it to be sent.

  • It will arrive somewhere else ( at another address, which might be the dead letter office)

  • It will never arrive,having been lost in the post

    …(A Derrida Dictionary, p.96 )


Negative theology

Negative Theology

At the very beginning of act V, the first clown is not sure if Ophelia deserves a “christian burial when she wilfully seeks her own salvation” by suicide. He continues that “It must be ‘se offendendo.’ It cannot be else. For here lies the point: if I drown myself wittingly, it argues an act, and an act hath three branches – it is, to act, to do, to perform” (Scene I). Plus the second clown responds that “Will you ha’ the truth on’t? If this had not been a gentlewoman, she should have been buried out o’Christian burial”.

We are not the ones to issue a rule in matters of religion, especially those related to God and afterlife. Plus, this is exactly giving a full stop to God’s territory of judgment and talking about who a true Christian is and who is not.


Artifactuality

Artifactuality

At the end of the play, before the fencing match, Laertesseems to have been able to control his emotions, apparently at least for a short time. When Hamlet apologizes for the misdeeds of past, Laertes asserts that he does not think of revenge. He says:

“I am satisfied in nature,

Whose motive, in this case, should stir me most

To my revenge. But in my terms of honor

I stand aloof, and will no reconcilement

Till by some elder masters, of known honor,

I have a voice and precedent of peace,

To keep my name ungored. But till that time,

I do receive your offered love like love

And will not wrong it.” (scene II).


William shakespeare s hamlet act v a deconstructive study

Laertes bases his judgment not on his personal notions, but on the notions derived and sealed as an un-negotiable deal from the beliefs and doctrines of his ancestors, which seem to be inevitably omnipresent.


Dead repetition undecidability

Dead Repetition & Undecidability

From the outset of the act or even the play Hamlet seems obsessed with many beliefs and thoughts. One of these very deep feelings he constantly reveals during the play is his mental picture of an impending death. After his father’s death, he seems helplessly unable to let go of the event. It seems like he subtly attracts deaths and misfortunes. He keeps losing his relatives and gradually he is left alone. Image of death, and dead body haunt him at times. In the graveyard, he thinks about the death of Alexander and Julius Caesar as noble men who finally died. He searches all the skulls the clown is unearthing and remembers most of them or guesses their identity through random speculations of the skull. Upon one of the skulls he opines:


William shakespeare s hamlet act v a deconstructive study

“I knew him, Horatio – a fellow of infinite jest, of most excellent fancy. He hath borne me on his back a thousand times. And now how abhorred in my imagination it is! My gorge rises at it. Here hung those lips that I have kissed I know not how oft. (to the skull ) Where be your gibes now? Your gambols? Your songs? Your flashes of merriment, that were wont to set the table on a roar?” (scene I). The way he is searching the skull gives the impression that he cherishes and feels nostalgic to the dead and remembrances of the past, which also includes his father as well. In fact, it can be understood that death plays the role of a living soul for him. This is exactly the sense of attachment to a repetition that is in essence dead and belongs to the past, that leads him to disintegration, and decay and pushes him to dark thoughts and endlessly looming misfortunes on the horizon.


Undecidability

Undecidability

Hamlet never finds himself unleashed from doubt and inability to decide on a firm ground. On the one hand, Hamlet finds his Oedipal feelings fullfilled by his uncle who serves (uncle) as a flesh and blood expression of his own repressed childhood fantasies. It’s no wonder he does not desire to kill him. On the other hand, Claudius has killed his father and this makes him mad. This give and take struggle of his fulfilled desires or Oedipal feelings pushes him to one side and his desire and consciousness to revenge forces him to the other.


Postal metaphor

Postal Metaphor

In the graveyard, Gertrude gets shocked by loosing her will-bride, also feels pity for her son, Hamlet .

Queen: “I hoped thou shouldst have been my Hamlet’s wife;Ithought thy bride-bed to have deck’d, sweet maid,Andnot have strew’d thy grave.”

Sense of unpredictability presents itself by what Gertrude claims about her wishes for his son. Fragmented nature of the world events performs its rule by randomization among essences and causes this sense. Some of events occur permenantly , but nonlinear. No fixed principals laws can lead them. We can’t force the nature to change its selections. Death of Ophelia is similar to the third probable destination for the letter in Derrida’s postal metaphor.


  • Login