Download
1 / 18
190 likes | 406 Views
Visible Learning. An overview of Hattie’s meta-analysis relating to influences on achievement. Overview. Identified 6 areas of influence Student Home School Teacher Curricula Teaching approaches. Rank these influences. Class size School size Home environment
E N D
Visible Learning An overview of Hattie’s meta-analysis relating to influences on achievement
Overview • Identified 6 areas of influence • Student • Home • School • Teacher • Curricula • Teaching approaches
Rank these influences • Class size • School size • Home environment • Providing formative evaluation • Phonics instruction • Quality teaching
Rank these influences • Providing formative evaluation • Phonics instruction • Home environment • Quality teaching • School size • Class size • 0.90 • 0.60 • 0.57 • 0.44 • 0.43 • 0.21
Measure of influence • Over 800 meta-analyses – over 50,000 studies • Only included studies using basic statistics • Effect sizes used to provide a single comparative scale • The higher the effect size, the greater the level of influence
The Challenge • Lots of ideas about what works best • Many show little evidence of gain
6 Signposts to excellence in education • Teachers among most powerful influences • Need to be directive, influential, caring and actively engaged in passion of T & L • Need to be aware of every student’s thinking and knowing • Need to know learning intentions and success criteria for every lesson, how well these are achieved and what to do next • Need to move from single ideas to multiple ideas and how these relate to student construction of knowledge • Leaders and teachers need to create safe learning environments that are welcoming of errors
Visible Teaching – Visible Learning When students SEE themselves as their own teachers When teachers SEE learning through the eyes of the student and
Michael Fullan says... One of the most critical problems faced by schools is “not resistance to innovation, but the fragmentation, overload and incoherence resulting from the uncritical and uncoordinated acceptance of too many different innovations.”
