road safety situation development in estonia
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Road safety situation development in Estonia

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 47

Road safety situation development in Estonia - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 157 Views
  • Uploaded on

Road safety situation development in Estonia. Harri KUUSK Deputy Director General Estonian Road Administration 2005. Facts : 45,000 km 2 1,36 m inhabitants 16,400 km national roads 1,430 km main roads. Estonia. Action planning. Organisations involved in actions

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Road safety situation development in Estonia' - donna-tran


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
road safety situation development in estonia

Road safety situation development in Estonia

Harri KUUSKDeputy Director GeneralEstonian Road Administration 2005

estonia

Facts :

  • 45,000 km2
  • 1,36 m inhabitants
  • 16,400 km national roads
  • 1,430 km main roads
Estonia

Harri Kuusk

action planning
Action planning
  • Organisations involved in actions
  • Responsibilities and liabilities of several institutions
    • State level
    • Local level
  • Teamwork and co-ordination organisms
  • Knowledge base about the causes of accidents and possibilities to improve the situation.

Harri Kuusk

institutions involved in road safety promotion state level
Institutions involved in Road Safety promotion (state level)
  • Ministry of Economic Affairs & Communications
    • Road Administration
    • Estonian Motor Vehicle Registration Centre
  • Ministry of Education
  • Ministry of Finances
    • Estonian Traffic Insurance Foundation
  • Ministry of Social Affairs
    • Centre for Health Promotion
  • Ministry of Internal Affairs
    • Police Board
    • Rescue Board

Harri Kuusk

institutions involved in road safety promotion state cont
Institutions involved in Road Safety promotion (state, cont.)
  • Exploration organisations
      • Tallinn Technical University
      • Tartu University
      • Tallinn Technical High School
      • IB Stratum
      • TNS EMOR
  • Advertising agencies
  • Media: radio, TV, newspapers, magazins
  • Corporate enterprises
    • Building, maintenance, architect & designer’s offices
  • Non profit institutions

Harri Kuusk

co operation methods
Co-operation methods
  • Lawmaking activities
  • Information sharing
    • Workgroup meetings and seminars
    • Meetings for decision makers
    • Involving of group members into international experience sharing
  • Participation in local specialist’s training.
  • Activities planning, financing or participation by know-how.

Harri Kuusk

stages
Stages
  • 1990 – 1994 reforms and rearrangements
  • 1995 – 1999 steady period, development
  • 2000 – 2005 second wave of reforms

Harri Kuusk

1990 1994
1990 -1994
  • Information gathering and lawmaking
    • 1991
      • speed in urban areas 50 km/h
      • Compulsory safety belts wearing on pillion (rear seat)
  • Reorganisation of executive administration
    • Road safety administration
      • Estonian Motor Vehicle Registration Centre
      • Road Safety Board

Harri Kuusk

1995 1999
1995 - 1999
  • Information gathering and lawmaking
    • 1995
      • Daytime running lights
    • 1996
      • Children restraints
    • 1997
      • Winter (studded) tyres, compulsory from Dec 1 to March 1 Possible from Oct 1 to May 1[from 2002])

Harri Kuusk

1995 1999 cont
1995 – 1999 (cont)
  • Reorganisation of executive administration
    • 1995
      • Road Administration incorporates
        • Road (Traffic) safety department. Responsible for traffic education and communication activities.

Harri Kuusk

2000 2005
2000 - 2005
  • Information gathering and lawmaking
    • 2001
      • Updated Roads Act and Traffic code
      • Blood alcohol level for drivers 0.2 ‰
      • Mobile phone use without hands-free illicit
  • Reorganisation of executive administration
    • 2002
      • Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications
      • Regional reform started
    • 2003
      • Traffic control unit re-established by Police

Harri Kuusk

road safety program development
Road Safety Program development

Based

  • On the surveys, monitoring and analysis of current traffic safety situation.
  • On the Road Safety Program designed by PHARE in 1997.
  • On the prognosis of the traffic safety situation for ten years.
  • On the Finnish Road Safety Program (has taken as example).

Harri Kuusk

road safety i n estonia
Road Safety in Estonia

Causes of poor road safety level are:

  • Unsafe road using attitudes of the population.
  • Deferred National Road Safety Program approval.
  • Wanting traffic education level in the schools.
  • Deficient new drivers education.

Harri Kuusk

road safety in estonia
Road Safety in Estonia

Causes of poor road safety level are:(cont):

  • Lag of road traffic infrastructure development.
  • Drivers behaviour habitudes:
    • Low safety devices usage habitude in the cars (back seat, children restraints).
    • Excessive speed and risk disregard.
    • High level of drunk drivers in the traffic.

Harri Kuusk

road safety program activities
Road Safety Program activities

Targeted on the following main directions:

  • Unprotected road users (pedestrians, bicyclists) safety
  • Children and elderly people safety
  • Young and inexperienced drivers safety

Harri Kuusk

road safety program activities1
Road Safety Program activities
  • Drunk driving diminishing
  • Decreasing of consequences of the RTA
  • Urban traffic safety
  • Decreasing a number of:
    • Dark time RTA &
    • Winter time RTA

Harri Kuusk

institutions involved in road safety promotion local
Institutions involved in Road Safety promotion (local)
  • Institution of local governing (government or public office)
  • County government
  • Local RA and outside specialists
  • Police, Fire & Rescue services
  • Corporate enterprises
  • Media: radio, newspapers, magazines
  • Architects, designers, estate agents etc.

Harri Kuusk

local planning
Local planning
  • Goals establishing
    • Measures of effectiveness (criteria: no killed pedestrians, no children injured etc.)
  • Exploration and analysis of local situation.
  • Resources planning
  • Local road safety development plan and program writing.

Harri Kuusk

recommendations for local planning
Recommendations for local planning
  • Safe environment development
    • Reduce noise, pollution and increase safety for the residents of different age.
    • Land use planning
    • Developing areas for sports and recreation
    • Health and social services planning
    • Education and training of population
  • Road maintenance organisation and supervisory.

Harri Kuusk

effective advantageous traffic organisation
Effective & advantageous traffic organisation
  • Safety audit
    • To determine dangerous and problematic places and causes of danger
  • Solution discussing and effectiveness assessment.
    • Traffic calming
    • Pedestrian crossings
    • Crossings
    • Car parking
  • Solutions monitoring and assessment.

Harri Kuusk

road safety audit
Road Safety Audit
  • Strongly recommended MEASURE for traffic environment assessment, preceding any planning, reconstruction or regulation exchange on the streets and roads.
  • Provided by independent specialists or organisation.
  • Actually this kind of work is not legally regulated in Estonia (only recommendations).

Harri Kuusk

safety audit realisation
Safety audit realisation
  • Initiated by local authorities, state authorities (RA) or any committer.
  • Realised by specialist or organisation, who has no direct interest in another parts of project.
  • Results will be discussed with three parts of project and has to be available for public opinion.

Harri Kuusk

remarks
Remarks

Harri Kuusk

good things
Good things
  • Small territory and population
  • Enthusiasm of population
  • Discerning decisions made at early stages of reforms
  • Public openness to new knowledge and experience
  • Embodiment to EU
  • Public interest to safety issues and problems
  • Private sector support to safety promotion

Harri Kuusk

discerning decisions
Discerning decisions
  • Road Safety administration separated from Traffic Police
  • Independent body implemented in Road Administration structure
  • Sufficient understanding of Road Safety issues significance at the Ministerial level
  • Sufficient financing from 1996

Harri Kuusk

co operation
Co-operation
  • Development of decision-makers network
  • All the activities supported by research and developmental work
  • Local specialist network support
  • Integration with schools and private activities toward Road Safety education and information dissemination
  • Good interaction with Police and support of campaign activities by Police enforcement

Harri Kuusk

obstacles
Obstacles
  • Long-drawn-out reforms
  • Some legislation changes
  • Mushrooming bureaucracy
  • Limited human resources

Harri Kuusk

examples
Examples

Harri Kuusk

media campaign
Media campaign

Beltup!

Harri Kuusk

slide38

Campaign idea

  • The main information is “BELT UP!”
  • The second slogan is “Belt up also on the back seats!”
  • The third message is “Police will control your seat belt usage”
    • Police makes a notice and admonition
    • Police gives you an opportunity to write an essay (2000)
    • POLICE controls and imposes a fine (2002-2003)

Conclusion:

  • Seat belt usage is simple, improves your safety and the theme will be actual in the future

Harri Kuusk

slide39

Outdoor 2002

Harri Kuusk

conclusions
Conclusions

Harri Kuusk

most important conclusions
Most importantconclusions
  • Discerning decisions at early stages
  • Public interest to safety issues and problems
  • Private sector support to safety promotion
  • Sufficient understanding of Road Safety issues significance at the Ministerial level
  • Sufficient financing from 1996
  • Acceptance of Road Safety program by Parliament

Harri Kuusk

important conclusions
Important conclusions
  • … that road traffic injuries, like other health and safety problems, can be understood, predicted, and prevented.
  • Public awareness about RS could be increased by systematic campaign and information dissemination activities
  • Good relations with journalists and media organisations must be maintained
  • Public trustworthiness to main safety promoting authority must be undoubted

Harri Kuusk

conclusions1
conclusions
  • Road Safety issues need a program based approach
  • Understanding of RS as broad complex of
    • Planning, engineering & management
    • Social, health & psychological
    • Legal, financial & security

Issue for whole society

(at the level of state, regional, local government)

Harri Kuusk

ad