1 / 6

Proposal for a new pad division

Proposal for a new pad division. Daniel. Current layout. Not projective in R across various layers in depth Size of pads vary a lot inside a detector Some pads have a funny shape Size a t high η isn’t significantly smaller than at low η

donkor
Download Presentation

Proposal for a new pad division

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Proposal for a new pad division Daniel

  2. Current layout • Not projective in R across various layers in depth • Size of pads vary a lot inside a detector • Some pads have a funny shape • Size at high η isn’t significantly smaller than at low η • Very difficult to describe such an arrangement by an algorithm

  3. Proposed new layout : 1- R segmentation • Projective in R : define an abstract grid for the 1st layer of the pivot plane, starting at lowest R of active layer, with a pitch of 80 mm. The intersection of this grid with layers 1 and 3 of both pivot and confirmation wedges sets the boundaries. • Same for layers 2 and 4, staggered by 40 mm • Much easier to describe by an algorithm

  4. Proposed new layout : 2- φsegmentation • Phi boundaries are no longer “vertical”, but follow the trapeze shape. • Define the (integer) number of φ divisions ineach unit (e.g. 4) • Pads are staggered half-half, but in the -1/4, +1/4 scheme: • -2.0 -1.25 -.25 .75 2.0 • -2.0 -.75 .25 1.25 2.0 • Ratio of smallest to largest pad in a row: 3/5

  5. All in all …. • Projective in R across various layers • Size of pads vary for 3 to 5 • No pad has a funny shape • At high eta, size is smaller than at low high L good for rate balance • “Simple” to describe by an algorithm

  6. What next ? • Go over the “details” and fine tune table of dead areas, etc… etc… • Repeat the optimization of φ-division in view of η dependence of rate. • Produce automatically all drawings and make sure that no bad surprise arises

More Related