1 / 23

CoRoT fields before CoRoT – Processing of Large Photometric Databases

CoRoT fields before CoRoT – Processing of Large Photometric Databases. Zoltán Csubry Konkoly Observatory Budapest, Hungary. Hungarian CoRoT Day Budapest, 2 007. 03. 12. Introduction. P revious talk: József Benk ő - CoRoT fields before CoRoT

Download Presentation

CoRoT fields before CoRoT – Processing of Large Photometric Databases

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CoRoT fields before CoRoT – Processing of Large Photometric Databases Zoltán Csubry Konkoly Observatory Budapest, Hungary Hungarian CoRoT Day Budapest, 2007. 03. 12.

  2. Introduction • Previous talk: József Benkő - CoRoT fields before CoRoT • Goal: Find variable stars in NSVS database (in CoRoT eyes) • This talk presents the method we used to reach our goal

  3. Pre-selection of candidates • ROTSE database: huge amount of photomertic data, pre-selection is needed • Variability index (Akerlof et al, 2000): correlation between the residuals from the comparison of each magnitude to the mean value →Ivar>4.5σ is a good criteria for variable star candidates • Stars with 11 or less good data points are omitted • Reduces the field to about 82 000 candidates (in CoRoT field of view and magnitude range)

  4. Difficulties • Still large amount of data → automated data processing algorithm required • Noisy and inhomogeneous data set • False signals (random or systematic errors, trends, sampling effects etc.) → automatic data processing is very obscure (difficult to separate false and real signals) → We used a two-step semi-automated method

  5. TiFrAn • Time-Frequency Analyzer • Developed in Konkoly Obs. for analyzis of multi-periodic time-series (by Z. Kolláth and Z. Csubry) • C software engine: →Time-frequency methods (Wavelet, Wigner-Ville, Choi-Williams, STFT etc.) →Other methods (FFT, DFT, interpolation, filtering, whitening etc.) • User-friendly Graphical Interface • High-level script language for complex tasks

  6. TiFrAn script language • Compatible with Tcl • Enables complete and/or repeatable tasks, and automatic processing of large data sets • Flexible output (PostScript figures and full log of data processing steps)

  7. Sample TiFrAn script • Read data from file • Calculate FFT • Find highest peak • Calculate frequency, amplitude and phase • Fit parameters • Whitening

  8. Application for NSVS data • Calculate frequency spectra, find main peaks • Find connection between the main peak attribute and variability • Significance index: s = (Apeak - <sp>) / σsp

  9. Significance index and variability • Rough manual analysis of a small subsample • Correlation between s and the variable ratio • Ratio of variables is less then 1% if s<4.5 • Reduce the field to ~10 000 stars (4481 on winter field and 5490 on summer field)

  10. Frequency distribution • Significant number of peaks are near whole number of cycle/day or zero • Long-period variables or trends • Try to use trend-filtering algorithm to separate (TFA, Kovács et al. 2005) → unsuccessful, NSVS data distribution does not allow • Manual search for long period variable stars

  11. Long period variables • Manual examination of TiFrAn output: variable stars with large amplitude and long period are easy to find • From higher significance index to lower • Lower s: semiregular and irregular variables, results are somewhat obscure → some of the stars are labeled as variable candidate

  12. Results: → 2302 lp variables (1332 new) → 198 candidates

  13. Reprocessing of remaining light curves • Whitening to eliminate sampling effects • Recalculate significance index • If s > 4.5 → Place back into the data pool for further analyzis

  14. Short period variables • More complex TiFrAn script • Determine accurate frequency, amplitude and phase with nonlinear fit • Create folded light curve • Manual examination of TiFrAn output: original and folded light curve + spectrum

  15. Results: → 206 sp variables and eclipsing binaries (58 new)

  16. Conclusion • Automatized analyzis of noisy and inhomogeneous data is very difficult, usually manual intervention needed • Two-step semi-automated method works well: 1. Reduce the number of candidates automatically 2. Final selection manually • Results: 2512 variable stars in COROT fields (1396 new) → 2302 long period variables → 161 short period variables → 45 eclipsing binaries

  17. Thank You!

More Related