Research based metadata requirements for a bls reports archive
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 13

Research-Based Metadata Requirements for a BLS Reports Archive PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 58 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Research-Based Metadata Requirements for a BLS Reports Archive. Scott Berridge John Bosley Daniel W. Gillman US Bureau of Labor Statistics. Current Historical Archive Situation. Publications date to 1886 For many publications – 1 copy exists Many publications irreplaceable

Download Presentation

Research-Based Metadata Requirements for a BLS Reports Archive

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Research based metadata requirements for a bls reports archive

Research-Based Metadata Requirements for a BLS Reports Archive

Scott Berridge

John Bosley

Daniel W. Gillman

US Bureau of Labor Statistics


Current historical archive situation

Current HistoricalArchive Situation

  • Publications date to 1886

  • For many publications – 1 copy exists

  • Many publications irreplaceable

    – no disaster recovery


Relevance to bls

Relevance to BLS

  • Unique historical archives

    • 120 years of publications

    • 10 years systematically available online

  • User expectations are rising

  • Standards are evolving

  • Mandates are under discussion


Meeting emerging standards

Meeting Emerging Standards

  • File Format

    • Adobe Acrobat PDF/A

  • Labeling

    • Adobe’s Extensible Metadata Platform (XMP)

  • Metadata Schema

    • Data Documentation Initiative (DDI)


Archive on bureau s website

Archive on Bureau’s Website

  • www.bls.gov

  • Servers inside and outside firewall

  • Public domain

  • Accessible thru BLS Home Page


Choosing metadata elements

Choosing Metadata Elements

  • Schema Choice

    • DDI Subset

  • Schema Useful?

    • Dissemination and Preservation

    • Perform user studies – 2 phases

      • Phase 1 -- Initial studies (3)

        • What users want / need

        • Relatively open-ended, exploratory

      • Phase 2 -- Focused studies (2)

        • Expose users to DDI subset

        • Obtain feedback


Reasons for ddi

Reasons for DDI

  • Want success @ BLS

  • Minimize capture burden

  • Unknowable metadata

    • Old documents (back to 1886)

    • DDI allows level of granularity

  • Conformance

    • Easy with DDI


Potential problem

Potential Problem

  • Dissemination and Preservation?

  • Is DDI suitable for preservation?

  • Preservation elements

  • Looking at other standards


User studies overview

User Studies--Overview

  • Adopt techniques of

    • focus groups

    • group interviews

  • Recruited members of general public

    • Screened for familiarity w/ Gov’t Stats

  • Five groups, 2-6 members per group

    • 3 groups -- initial, exploratory

    • 2 groups – review DDI elements


User studies results

User Studies Results

  • Initial exploratory groups (3)

    • Descriptors consistently identified

      • title, date, and geographic coverage

      • Descriptors essential and informative

    • Members – generalize in abstract - hard

      • Difficulty imagining other descriptors

      • If personal need does not exist a priori, then

        • “What can I do with this information?”

        • “How is it useful to me?”


User studies results1

User Studies Results

  • DDI-focused groups (2)

    • Descriptors verified

      • Keywords also very important

      • However, very large sets of keywords

        • Counterproductive or Confusing

        • “TMI” – information overload


User studies results2

User Studies Results

  • DDI-focused groups (2)

    • Some want title or subtitle to answer

      • “How is this report useful to me?”

      • “How can I put it to use?”

      • Example – Title includes “A guide”

        • More useful than the formal title/name

    • Criterion for acquiring a document

      • Action, use of information

      • Not subject matter


Conclusion

Conclusion

  • Questions

  • Contact

    • Scott Berridge

      • [email protected]

    • John Bosley

      • [email protected]

    • Dan Gillman

      • [email protected]


  • Login