1 / 40

Capital , Volume I, Chapter One

Capital , Volume I, Chapter One. Labor Theory of Value. Structure of the Chapter. Section 1: The Substance of Value Section 2: The Measure of Value Section 3: The Form of Value Section 4: Fetishism. Sec. 1: The Substance of Value. Flow of the Argument: From commodity exchange

doctor
Download Presentation

Capital , Volume I, Chapter One

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Capital, Volume I, Chapter One Labor Theory of Value

  2. Structure of the Chapter • Section 1: The Substance of Value • Section 2: The Measure of Value • Section 3: The Form of Value • Section 4: Fetishism

  3. Sec. 1: The Substance of Value Flow of the Argument: From commodity exchange (A exchanges for B) to Abstract Labor (What they have in common)

  4. “Dialectical” Flow • In Hegel: • being? = nothing (becoming) • In Marx • exchange? = abstract labor (money form) • Why “labor”? • At heart of capitalist social relations • Saw in Part VIII on Primitive Accumulation

  5. Why “Abstract” Labor? • Labor abstracted from specificity • Defined without regard to type of concrete, “useful labor” (technical term) • “Labor” as a general notion • Historically specific concept • before capitalism there was no “labor” • with capitalism all activity becomes “labor”

  6. “Labor” = “Work” • Engels differentiated the two • Labor = work in capitalism • Work = the more general concept • But, if there is no general concept of work outside of capitalism, then there is no difference

  7. “Abstraction” of abstract labor • concept is abstracted from concrete, useful labor • concept designates common social meaning: social control • concept denotes process/tendency toward abstractness, i.e.,deskilling of work

  8. Sec.2: Measure of Value • Ques: How do you measure “useful labor”? • Ans: by the time it takes • Ques: How do you measure “abstract labor”? • Ans: by the social time it takes • Measure of value = SNLT = socially necessary labor time

  9. Measure and Productivity • Productivity = output per unit of input, or = output per hour of work • Doubling productivity = 2X product for same work time (individual or social) • Same work time = same useful labor time, same abstract labor time • So, 2X productivity = 1/2 SNLT per unit

  10. Sec. 3: The Form of Value • The Simple Form • The Expanded Form • The General Form • The Money Form

  11. The Simple Form xA = yB • A, B = randomly exchanged commodities • x, y = quantifiers • “=” sign means “is worth” • primary focus is on the qualitative characteristics of this relationship

  12. The Relative Form • In the expression xA = yB • xA is said to have the “relative form”of value • “Relative form” = the value of A is expressed “relative” to B • “B” can be any commodity, so whatever it is, the value of A is being expressed relative to that commodity

  13. The Equivalent Form • In the expression xA = yB • yB is said to have the “equivalent form” of value • “Equivalent form” = a use-value B is the expression of A’s value • We exchange A for B, we look at B and we say, “Ah! this B is the equivalent of the A we traded away!”

  14. Contradiction • In the relationship xA = yB, • A and B are in a particular kind of relationship • Each is the opposite of the other, one has its value expressed, the other does the expressing • Their meaning is inseparable from the relation • We call this a “contradiction” (opposition + unity) • In Pt.VIII we saw that the “class” relationship involved such a contradiction

  15. Contradiction & Class - 1 • Working Class & Capital • are like • xA = yB • Within capitalism, working class is defined and takes its meaning from its exchange with capital • Labor market: x(work) = y(income)

  16. Contradiction & Class - 2 • Workers in “relative form” • Workers’s “value” gets expressed in relationship, e.g., what you are worth is given by your wage • Capital in “equivalent form” • Capital’s “equivalent” (wage, income) expresses this value

  17. Contradiction & Class - 3 • Yet, the relationship is NOT balanced • Workers can be (and were) people without capital, outside of wage, etc. • Capital can only be capital with people as its workers • So, people can rebel/escape, capital cannot • Here is the potential for revolution

  18. Reflexive Mediation • In xA = yB, B mediates A’s relationship to itself • A discovers its own value through B • B is like a mirror • In a mirror we see one aspect of ourselves: our visible light images • A discovers one aspect of itself: its “value”

  19. Reflexive Mediation & Class • Capital mediates people’s relationship to themselves • They see themselves as as mere “workers” e.g., John Barton - Mill Worker (WC in-itself) e.g., John Barton - Unionist (WC for-itself) • BUT, they can see other aspects of themselvs outside of this relationship e.g., Job Legh - naturalist

  20. Reflexive Mediation & School • School mediates students’ relationship to themselves • They see themselves as mere “students” e.g., vis à vis the teacher e.g., vis à vis the administration • Grade defines “kind” of student e.g., “this is a ‘B’ student • Some “students” rebel at this narrow definition

  21. Reflexive Mediation & Relationships • Child - Parent • Boyfriend - Girlfriend • Wife - Husband • All involve reflexive mediation, BUT • People ARE multidimensional • People NEED multiple mirrors • So, all these relationships, if isolated, can lead to insanity or rebellion

  22. Child - Parent • Early on: • child identifies with parent, relationship is enough of a definition of self • parent identifies self as parent • Later: • child must find new mirrors, break free of single source of self-defintion • Same for parents! Hardest for house-wife-mother.

  23. Boyfriend - Girlfriend Wife - Husband • Early On: • Intense focus on the other as VERY favorable mirror of self, reciprocal mirroring • Later On: • 1. People’s lives are multidimensionable and intense focus can’t be sustained • 2. People must find multiple mirrors

  24. Deficiency of Simple Form • Equivalent form B is discreet, accidental • “Value” expressed by product of a particular useful labor • BUT, the nature of value is universal • So, there is a contradiction between the universal substance of value (abstract labor) and its particular expression in the simple form of value

  25. The Expanded Form xA = yB = zC = nN • Expanded relative form of value • Limitation of equivalent form is overcome • Equivalent form consists of ALL other commodities and thus no longer particular • This form is “totalizing”, infinite

  26. Totalization • Expanded form is “totalizing” because every commodity that exists can represent the value of any one commodity • Capital seeks this totalization • seeks to convert all of life into commodities • seeks to impose work on everyone • seeks to impose a “master narrative” on world

  27. Infinity - 1 • The expanded form is infinite in the sense that there is no limit to expanding world of commodities, “nN” goes to infinity • Capital has this quality of endless expansion • through space (colonialism, imperialism, SciFi) • through time (“end of history”) • through all of reality (commodification of the cosmos, galactic work-machine)

  28. Infinity - 2 • However, the infinity of the expanded form is a “bad” infinity, in the Hegelian sense • The expression of value is not unified; it is a mosaic of differentiated expressions • This contradicts the unitary nature of value • A unique substance should have a unique expression

  29. The General Form yB = xA zC = xA nN = xA • In the general form the value of each and every commodity has a common, unique expression. • The equivalent form is universal • “A” is the “universal equivalent”

  30. Good Infinity • The General Form is infinite just like expanded form: expands endlessly • BUT, this is a “good” infinity because it is not just a list of discrete expressions • Rather, it is a unified expression of a unitary substance, common to all • Universal equivalent mediates everthing

  31. Syllogistic Mediation - 1 yB = xA zC = xA nN = xA • yB is related to zC only through xA • two things mediated by a third is called “syllogistic mediation”

  32. Syllogistic Mediation - 2 • Aristotelian syllogism: • Caesar is a man • All men are mortal • Therefore: Caesar is mortal • Caesar the Individual is related to the Universal trait of mortality through his Particular characteristic of being a man (I-P-U)

  33. Syllogistic Mediation - 3 • Hegel’s Interest: Syll. = form of movement • Elements: (U)niversal, (P)articular, & (I)ndividual • In a fully developed syllogistic form all elements are mediated in their relationships • I-P-U, • P-U-I, • U-I-P

  34. Syllogistic Mediation & Class-1 • Working class in-itself defined by capital • Working class in-itself is a “serial group” • Capital seeks to mediate among workers • pays some a wage, some not • pays some more, some less • divides by job, plant, industry • divides to control

  35. Syllogistic Mediation & Class-2 • Worker (W) - (I)ndividaul • Capital (K) - (U)niversal • Union -(P)articular • W - K - U (right to work laws) • But also: K - W - U (K uses scabs) : W - U - K (U mediates W vs K) • Rupture: wildcat strikes bypass U

  36. Syllogistic Mediation & School • Elements: (S)tudents, (P)rofessors, (A)dministration • S - P - A (profs impose rules, absorb anger) • P - S - A (admin uses student evaluations) • S - A - P (profs use admin against students) • Rupture: S bypass P and attack A

  37. Syllogistic Mediation & Relationships • Elements: men (M),women (W) & capital (K) • M - K - W (marriage, sodomy, divorce laws) • K - M - W (K uses M to control W) • K - W - M (K uses W to control M) • Rupture: Women’s movement bypasses M to attack capital directly, eg. welfare

  38. The Money Form - 1 yB = xAu zC = xAu nN = xAu • Au = gold, money • Only difference from general form is that universal equivalent is determined by social custom, structures of power

  39. The Money Form - 2 • Includes all previous forms • Has all their characteristics • contradiction (unity & opposition) • reflexive mediation (money shows value) • totalizing (money value displaces all others) • infinite (endless expansion, common link) • syllogistic mediation (everything is mediated by money), eg., yB - xAu - zC, or C - M - C

  40. --End--

More Related