1 / 34

Current Performance and Future Possibilities of HERA

Current Performance and Future Possibilities of HERA. 7 July 2001 Georg Hoffstaetter (DESY, Hamburg). HERMES (7 GeV). H1 (318 GeV). HERA. ZEUS. HERA-B (42 GeV). PETRA. H1. 778 m. HERMES. HERA. HERA-B. Polarized Electrons Protons. DESY. PETRA. ZEUS. 6336 m long.

diza
Download Presentation

Current Performance and Future Possibilities of HERA

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Current Performanceand Future Possibilities of HERA 7 July 2001 Georg Hoffstaetter (DESY, Hamburg) HERMES (7 GeV) H1 (318 GeV) HERA ZEUS HERA-B (42 GeV) PETRA

  2. H1 778 m HERMES HERA HERA-B Polarized Electrons Protons DESY PETRA ZEUS 6336 m long HERA and its Pre-Accelerator Chain Georg.Hoffstaetter@desy.de

  3. HERA: Improvements 1999/2000 Beam current: and 1999 2000 mA Average peak luminosity ( ) 1999 2000 Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.de

  4. 1999 2000 HERA: Efficiency 1999/2000 Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.de

  5. Development of the Luminosity HERA Luminosity 1993-2000 Linear increase of the integrated Luminosity Integrated Luminosity (1/pb) The time for a luminosity upgrade of HERA has come Days after start of run Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.de

  6. specific luminosity ( ) Specific Luminosity and Polarization % 55 Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.de

  7. The HERA Lumi-Upgrade Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.de

  8. Concept of HERA IRs m • Beam separation by super-conducting magnets in the detectors • e-bending radius reduced from 1200 m to 400 m • More radiation power: 28 kW, critical Energy = 150 kV • Radiation passes the detector, absorbers at 11, 19, and 25 m Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.de

  9. The Detector Region courtesy B.Holzer courtesy B.Holzer Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.de

  10. New Components • 4 super-conducting magnets ( BNL ) [6 MDM] • 56 normal-conducting magnets (Eframov Inst.) [6 MDM] • 448 m UH Vacuum system [6 MDM] • Absorbers, instrumentation, controls, stands, … [6 MDM] Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.de

  11. Superconducting Magnet GO Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.de

  12. Superconducting Magnet GO Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.de

  13. One Pipe - Three Beams Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.de

  14. Synchrotron Radiation Absorber Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.de

  15. Parameters Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.de

  16. Potential Problems Focusing: • Dynamic Aperture OK? • Polarization OK?, Luminosity OK? • Can HERA be handled well? • Polarization OK?, Luminosity OK? • Too strong beam-beam force on p? • Too strong beam-beam force on e? fRF increase: Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.de

  17. Emittance and Lumi for 72° Optic • The Luminosity was initially too small: Lumiscan Bunch has no product distribution: • coupling • Luminosity with 72° is large as expected Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.de

  18. Kick Dynamic Aperture for 72° Optic x´ V2(kV) The kick where half the current is lost leads to a satisfactory dynamic aperture. x Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.de

  19. Polarization Ie 60% Polarization for 72° Optic • Polarization was in the spin matched 72° optic quickly brought to 63% (one day). • Harmonic bumps were immediately effective • Decoupling bumps worked well Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.de

  20. Luminosity for fRF Increase • 6 more measurements indicate • For the center frequency , the luminosity is increased as expected Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.de

  21. Too Strong Beam-Beam Force on p? 16mA 73mA Corresponding e-current after upgrade Lsis independent of e-current Tp depends on e-current Tails depend on e-current Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.de

  22. Too Strong Beam-Beam Force on e? Ls So far no reduction of Ls by the bunch current Ippb No reduction of Ls by the second experiment No reduction of Ls by a larger b-funktionen Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.de

  23. Limits for the Lumi Upgrade m • beam-beam tune shiftfor e and p • hourglass effectfor protons • backgrounddue to synchrotron radiation and scattered e • dynamic apertureof electrons Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.de

  24. Where are the Beam-Beam Limits? Upgrade and Ip=140mA: emittance starts to grow Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.de

  25. Luminosity ( ) Lumi Reduction by Hourglass Effect bunch length: 6cm p e 20cm 30cm Length19cm: 12cm: Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.de

  26. mm mm m Horizontal: grows slower Vertical: grows faster Tuneshift Change by Hourglass Effect Protons Electrons Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.de

  27. Tune Shift with Bunch Length Effect How will the tune shift parameters change and have these been analyzed by accelerator experiments ? Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.de

  28. Bunch Length Dependent Resonances 10Qy Resonance 6Qx+4Qy Resonance For maximum For maximum Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.de

  29. Resonances with Bunch Length Effect How will the resonance strength change and have these been analyzed by accelerator experiments ? All large resonance strength are due to the proton bunch length Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.de

  30. Nominal and Ultimate Parameters The performance goal of HERA is not unrealistic and should not be too hard to achieve. A shortfall of beam intensity in the short term can be compensated. Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.de

  31. Spin-Orbit Tracking with Quaternions • Computation of the • invariant spin field by analyzing tracking data: • Fourier analysis • Stroboscopic averaging • Antidamping Computations performed in SPRINT, Hoffstaetter and Vogt, DESY/00 Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.de

  32. High Order Resonance Strength • Resonances up to 19th order can be observed • Resonance strength can be determined from tune jump. Spin tune Tracked depolarizationasexpected Computations performed in SPRINT, Hoffstaetter and Vogt, DESY/00 Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.de

  33. Increasing the Proton Current PETRA: N=60, 50 MHz 10 MHz & 5 MHz N=30, 50 MHz 10 MHz & 5 MHz Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.de

  34. TESLA with Röntgen FEL Röntgen FEL Super-conducting Electron Linac Detector and Experimental Area Wiggler for the Positron Source Cryogenic Halls Super-conducting Positron Linac Tunnel Damping Ring Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.de

More Related