2011 systems science grantsmanship workshop
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
2011 Systems Science Grantsmanship Workshop

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 16

2011 Systems Science Grantsmanship Workshop - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 70 Views
  • Uploaded on

2011 Systems Science Grantsmanship Workshop. USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture in cooperation with University of Tennessee AgResearch. Prior Workshops. The Grant Process: Application, Review, and Award. Daniel Schmoldt. The Application Process. Application e-Correspondence.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' 2011 Systems Science Grantsmanship Workshop' - dixon


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
2011 systems science grantsmanship workshop

2011 Systems Science Grantsmanship Workshop

USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture

in cooperation with

University of Tennessee AgResearch

application e correspondence
Application e-Correspondence

After an application package is submitted, the AR will receive a series of four e-mails. The titles of the four e-mails are:

application e correspondence1
Application e-Correspondence

And, there’s one more…

  • If accepted for peer review, the application will be assigned a NIFA application number (e.g., YEAR-XXXXX). This number should be cited on all future correspondence.
the review process
The Review Process
  • The first part of the process is the administrative review
    • A main focus of the administrative review is to facilitate the peer review
  • The second part of the process is a peer review
the peer review process
The Peer-Review Process
  • Reviewers for a particular year are selected based on the types of applications that are submitted
    • All panelists are considered experts in their fields
    • Panelists can include: academia, federal labs, NGOs, industry, technology providers
    • Around 30 % of the panelists are from the previous year
    • A number of diversity criteria are applied before invitations are sent
the peer review process1
The Peer-Review Process
  • Each application must be reviewed by at least 3 external reviewers
    • Panelists are generally assigned 10 to 20 applications to review
    • Reviewers are provided with the RFA and the evaluation criteria
    • Applications that don’t adhere to the guidelines and criteria are not likely to be funded
ad