1 / 8

SES Performance scheme Xavier FRON Head PRU 12 th July 2012

Performance Review Body Designated by the European Commission. SES Performance scheme Xavier FRON Head PRU 12 th July 2012. The SES Performance scheme. SES II performance scheme (EU legislation) Defines Key Performance Areas (KPA), Indicators (KPI) EU performance targets adopted by EC

dimaia
Download Presentation

SES Performance scheme Xavier FRON Head PRU 12 th July 2012

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Performance Review Body Designated by the European Commission SES Performance scheme Xavier FRON Head PRU 12th July 2012

  2. The SES Performance scheme • SES II performance scheme (EU legislation) • Defines Key Performance Areas (KPA), Indicators (KPI) • EU performance targets adopted by EC • Reference Period 1 (RP1, 2012-14) • Reference Period 2 (RP2, 2015-19), etc • National/FAB Performance Plans • Targets and incentives adopted by States • EC/PRB assess consistency of Performance Plans with European targets • EC/PRB and NSAs monitor performance against targets • Corrective actions as required, at NSA or EC initiative • Independent advisory Performance Review Body (PRB) • assisting the EC • assisting National Supervisory Authorities (NSA) on request

  3. SES Performance scheme Implementation schedule

  4. RP1 Environmental target SES environmental target: apparently weak (-0.75% in 5 years vs. 10% in MP) But slightly more demanding than earlier plans Keeps ANS-related emissions stable while traffic grows Carbon-neutral growth of aviationas far as ANS is concerned 500k tons CO2 saved in 2014 vs. 2009 performance Economic benefits € 200M in 2014 vs. 2009 (Flight time and fuel burn) NM has accountability for reaching the EU target SU: Service units

  5. Revised plans PC target RP1 Capacity target • EU target (0.5 min/flight) more demanding than PC target • 0.7 min. for whole year, eq. to 1 min. in summer • Aggregated plans don’t quite match the EU target (few plans not in line) • Lower traffic makes it easier to reach the target (latest forecast: 0.32 min/flight) • NM takes accountability for reaching the EU target in NMPP

  6. Evidence for the capacity target • The estimated “optimum delay” is one of the pieces of evidence used in setting the capacity targets

  7. RP1 Cost-Efficiency target • Aggregated plans 1% above over RP1 • €2.4 B savings vs. 2009 • EU target (53.92 €/SU) is 15% below 2009 baseline • Caps costs at nearly constant level • Charging regime caps the revenue • No more cost recovery • Lower traffic makes the target more challenging

  8. Conclusion • The performance scheme is a key tool in the SES toolbox • Initial experience being gathered under RP1 • Opportunity to refine the performance scheme from RP2 onwards • Relevant inputs expected from this symposium

More Related