1 / 1

Cardio-Sis

Cardio-Sis. Incidence of LVH was lower with tight control over usual control (11.4% vs. 17.0% ) Composite (death, MI, stroke, TIA, CHF, angina, new AF, revascularization, aortic dissection, PAD, ESRD) was lower with tight control Adverse events, including hypotension, were similar.

dieter
Download Presentation

Cardio-Sis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Cardio-Sis Incidence of LVH was lower with tight control over usual control (11.4% vs. 17.0%) Composite (death, MI, stroke, TIA, CHF, angina, new AF, revascularization, aortic dissection, PAD, ESRD) was lower with tight control Adverse events, including hypotension, were similar (p = 0.013) (p = 0.003) Trial design:Nondiabetic hypertensive patients with 1 cardiac risk factor were randomized to usual BP control or tight control (SBP <130 mm Hg). Patients were followed for 2 years. Results 9.4 10 20 17.0 % 11.4 5 % 10 4.8 Conclusions • Tight control of SBP (<130 mm Hg) in non-diabetic hypertensive patients with ≥1 CV risk factor was associated with reduced LVH and better outcomes at 2 years than usual control • If confirmed by other trials, current JNC-7 guidelines will need to be revised 0 0 Incidence of LVH Composite endpoint Tight control (n = 558) Usual control (n = 553) Verdecchia P, et al. Lancet 2009;374:525-33

More Related