1 / 17

Regional disparities in Bulgaria – evaluation and policy implications

Regional disparities in Bulgaria – evaluation and policy implications. Yana Kirilova, Ph.D. Institute of Economic Studies, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences. General information. Bulgaria – member of the EU since 2007. EU structural and cohesion funds utilized through operational programs.

diep
Download Presentation

Regional disparities in Bulgaria – evaluation and policy implications

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Regional disparities in Bulgaria – evaluation and policy implications Yana Kirilova, Ph.D. Institute of Economic Studies, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences

  2. General information • Bulgaria – member of the EU since 2007. • EU structural and cohesion funds utilized through operational programs. • Operational Program “Regional Development” • Next programming period 2014-2020 – need for new programming of regional development.

  3. Preparation of OPRD 2014-2020 • Project “Socio-economic analyses for preparation of OPRD 2014-2020” • Institute of Economic Studies, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences • Sofia Consulting Group, Bulgaria • Four-year project (2011-2014)

  4. Analyses focused on: • Regional disparities in terms of: • Demographic situation; • Labor market; • Incomes; • Economic development; • Transport infrastructure; • Tourism (services provided and infrastructure); • Social services and infrastructure (education, health, culture, social services).

  5. Summary score of socio- economic development • Integral indicator; • To choose minimum indicators showing all major characteristics of the studied territorial units. • To develop a methodology that shows the combined influence of these indicators

  6. Indicators • Coefficient of natural growth of the population • Coefficient of migration of the population • Employment coefficient • GDP per capita • Capital investments per capita • Number of nights spent by tourists per 1000 population

  7. Indicators • Cultivated arable land per capita • Incomes per member of a household • Unemployment rate • Length of railways and roads per 1000 sq.km. • Share of university students in population • Medical doctors per 100 000 population

  8. Steps for calculating the summary scores • Making the values of the individual indicators commensurate (BGN, %, dka,km, numbers); • For each indicator: • The territorial unit with the highest value becomes a benchmark = 100% • All the rest – get a % compared to the benchmark • The summary score for a territorial unit = average of the sum of its % for the individual indicators

  9. Summary scores of socio-economic development of Bulgarian regions 9

  10. Summary scores of socio-economic development of Bulgarian regions 10

  11. 11

  12. Disparities among the districts within the regions 12

  13. 13

  14. Conclusions for the regional policy • Two models of regional development are monitored: • Model 1: Center-periphery • At national level – SWR and the rest • At regional level – SWR, SCR, NER and the rest • At district level (central municipality and periphery) • Model 2: Bipolar model • At national level – Sofia and Varna • At regional level – SER (Burgas and Stara Zagora) • At district level (2 strong municipalities and the rest)

  15. Conclusions for the regional policy • The disparities among regions and districts – arguments for implementing two types of regional policy: • Reducing disparities – directing resources towards underdeveloped districts • Development of growth centers - directing resources towards highly developed districts

  16. What did the policy makers actually choose? • OPRD 2014-2020 • To support 67 cities and towns (centers of regions and municipalities) • Concentrating population • Concentrating technical and social infrastructure

More Related