1 / 13

Content State of the Art - Current period Some findings Recommendations - Next programming period

Lo sviluppo della valuazione nel futuro Programma MED Bologna , 20 june 2013 La valutazione dei progetti di Cooperazione Territoriale Europea : metodi di lavoro e riflessioni Lydwine Lafontaine, JTS MED Programme.

didier
Download Presentation

Content State of the Art - Current period Some findings Recommendations - Next programming period

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Lo sviluppodellavaluazionenelfuturoProgramma MEDBologna, 20 june 2013La valutazione dei progetti di Cooperazione Territoriale Europea:metodi di lavoro e riflessioniLydwine Lafontaine, JTS MED Programme

  2. Evolvement of the evaluation of projects results and added-value in the future MED Programme Content State of the Art - Current period Some findings Recommendations - Next programming period Challenges Solutions “under review” Principles – Next programming period

  3. State of the Art Current period (1/2)

  4. State of the Art Current period (2/2)

  5. Evaluation of implemented projects Some findings on results* “The in-depth interviews and analysis of projects results (particularly deliverables) reveal that situations are complex. The types of situations/projects are very diverse. • At the conclusion of their work, some 'traditional' projects appear to be projects that could be categorised as 'strategic'. • Others appear to be a combination of local projects, where the transnational element has generally been achieved but with very limited ambition. • High quality projects and results which have not benefited from the right partnership to produce results and which are very unlikely to result in any sustainability.” * Extract from Evaluation in Itinere 2012 Report to be published shortly on www.programmemed.eu

  6. Some recommendations Next programming period • Selection of projects: • More qualitative information inserted in a simplified application form • More targeted calls, better understanding of programme expectations • Technical of scientific expertise to support selection process • Monitoring and support in implementation of project activities: • Structured animation • Improvement of monitoring methods and tools ( incl. tools to enable use of meta-indicators) • Assessment and capitalisation of outputs and results: • Setting up a technical qualitative evaluation for final outputs and results insisting from the AF on the obligation of results • Better structure and coordination of process

  7. Challenges Next programming period

  8. Solutions « under review »*Type of calls / projects MED projects generate three types of outputs, corresponding to three different phases: • Exploration of intervention fields and state of the art > action plan • Experimentation with operational activities, pilot projects • Capitalisation and dissemination of outputs and practices Applicants can set up projects on one, two or three different phases *Task Force

  9. Solutions « under review »Type of calls / projects Projects with two or three phases: • Each phase is considered as a project • Applicants must achieve the main objectives of one phase before applying for the next one • The implementation of the following phase is submitted to a new selection process through a new application Different competencies for each stage/phase (new partnerships)

  10. Solutions « under review »Type of calls / projects For one single call, projects can be of different profile and dimension: • Micro-projects, small budgets focused on targeted issues / pilot actions (intermediary bodies, private bodies, research centres…) • Large projects with institutional partners, larger networks, important territorial coverage, etc. Pilot actions • Concrete and measurable activities • Innovative dimension • Possibility of small scale investments

  11. Solutions « under review »Necessary complementary adjustments • Support of external expertise for selection and evaluation of technical aspects of outputs and results • Set of relevant indicators (on-going working group for TF) • Integration of additional monitoring tools on PRESAGE in addition to reporting procedures to feed indicators • Harmonization of monitoring approach, more participative, involving NCP, LO for more effective and efficient dissemination and capitalisation process

  12. Evaluation of the future MED ProgrammePRINCIPLES Reduce identified limited zone of readability for : • more accurate and deeper knowledge of projects implementation, • qualitative monitoring and support, • deeper analysis of outputs and results , better decision making process for programme adjustments and capitalisation

  13. Thank you stc_med@regionpaca.fr www.programmemed.eu

More Related