the relationship of counselor level variables to intervention adoption
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
The relationship of counselor-level variables to intervention adoption

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 13

The relationship of counselor-level variables to intervention adoption - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 118 Views
  • Uploaded on

The relationship of counselor-level variables to intervention adoption. Joseph Guydish, Holly Fussell, Sarah Turcotte Manser, Lynn E. Kunkel, Mable Chan, & Dennis McCarty AHSR 2010 Lexington, Kentucky

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' The relationship of counselor-level variables to intervention adoption' - dianne


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
the relationship of counselor level variables to intervention adoption

The relationship of counselor-level variables to intervention adoption

Joseph Guydish, Holly Fussell, Sarah Turcotte Manser,

Lynn E. Kunkel, Mable Chan, & Dennis McCarty

AHSR 2010

Lexington, Kentucky

This work was supported by NIDA R01DA025600 and the Western States Research Node of the NIDA Clinical Trials Network (U10 DA015815)

adoption of evidence based practices ebps
Adoption of Evidence-Based Practices (EBPs)
  • One goal of the CTN is to translate EBPs shown to be effective into clinical practice
  • EBPs are tested in multi-site clinical trials
  • Clinicians and supervisors trained
  • Opportunity to try a new intervention
  • What happens to the EBP once the trial ends?
spaceship rct
Spaceship RCT

Clinical Trial

Adherence

Resources

Intervention

Training

Setting

Motivations

Interests

Admin

Usual

Staff

Supervisor

slide4

Adoption of Matrix Following Clinical Trial

  • Adoption of Matrix at 8 clinics
  • Qualitative interviews at multiple levels
  • Transcribed and coded

Matrix Clinical Trial Interviews (n=42)

Interviews were completed 2-12 months after treatment phase completion

slide5

Adoption of Matrix at Clinic Sites

Guydish, J.,Turcotte Manser, S., Jessup, M., Tajima, B., Sears, C., & Montini, T.  (2005) Multi-level assessment protocol (MAP) for adoption in multi-site clinical trials, Journal of Drug Issues. 35, 529-546.

slide6

Adoption of MI/MET at Clinic Sites

Guydish, J., Jessup, M., Tajima, B., Turcotte Manser, S. (2010) Adoption of Motivational Interviewing and Motivational Enhancement Therapy following clinical trials. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 6, 215-226.

ctn 0031 stage 12 stimulant abuser groups to engage in 12 step
CTN 0031 STAGE-12:Stimulant Abuser Groups to Engage in 12-Step
  • Twelve Step Facilitation
  • 10 sites
  • Stimulant Users
  • 5 group sessions and 3 individual sessions
relationships in translational research aligned with stage 12 clinical trial
Relationships in Translational Research, Aligned with Stage -12 Clinical Trial

Pre-STAGE 12

During STAGE 12 Study

Post STAGE 12

Organizational

Variables

Counselor

Factors

Adoption

(Qualitative Measure)

Implementation

Fidelity

Client

Outcomes

summary of measures
Summary of Measures

Pre-STAGE 12 Staff Survey (119 Counselors)

    • ATSG (General 12 step attitudes)
    • SIGCS (Goal Commitment)

During STAGE 12 Implementation Fidelity (29 Counselors)

      • Overall Skill and Fidelity
      • Proscribed Behaviors
      • Empathy

During STAGE 12 Client Outcomes: Days stimulant use in past 30

Post-STAGE 12 Adoption: Qualitative Interviews

  • ATSG: Laudet, A.B.; White, W.L. (2005) An exploratory investigation of the association between clinicians\' attitudes toward twelve-step groups and referral rates. Alcohol Treatment Quarterly, 23 (1), 31-45.
  • SIGCS: Hollenbeck, J.R., C.R. Williams, & H. Klein (1989). “An empirical examination of the antecedents of commitment to difficult goals.” Journal of Applied Psychology,74(1): 12-23.
slide10

Descriptive Statistics for STAGE-12 counselors as compared to non-STAGE-12 counselors in survey data (n=119)

slide12

Regression Models (n=29): Baseline variables predicting fidelity outcomes

*significant at 0.05 level

slide13

Summary

54%

STAGE 12 counselors older, + 12 step attitudes, higher goal commitment

For 12 step counselors

Women had lower proscribed behaviors

and higher overall fidelity implementation

In regression predicting implementation:

Goal Commitment, gender predict proscribed beh.

Progress towards completion

ad