1 / 22

Design of a High Precision Comparator for Implementation of a WDR Sensor

Miriam Pekar Alex Liberchuk Supervisors: Dr. Alexander Fish Mr. Arthur Spivak. Design of a High Precision Comparator for Implementation of a WDR Sensor. P-2011-130. 10/2011. What is an Image Sensor?.

diana-cobb
Download Presentation

Design of a High Precision Comparator for Implementation of a WDR Sensor

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Miriam Pekar Alex Liberchuk Supervisors: Dr. Alexander Fish Mr. Arthur Spivak Design of a High Precision Comparator for Implementation of a WDR Sensor P-2011-130 10/2011

  2. What is an Image Sensor? • An image sensor is a device that converts an optical image into an electronic signal. It is used mostly in digital cameras and other imaging devices. • The two most popular kinds of image sensors are: • Charge-coupled device (CCD). • Complementary Metal–Oxide–Semiconductor (CMOS).

  3. Why CMOS and not CCD? • CMOS is implemented using less components. • CMOS sensors consume less power. This is important in portable devices. • Provides faster readout. • Cheaper to manufacture. CMOS Drawbacks: • CMOS sensors, traditionally, are more susceptible to noise. • Light sensitivity of a CMOS chip tends to be lower because several transistors are located next to each photodiode. • CMOS sensors tend to have Low Dynamic Range.

  4. Effects of Low Dynamic Range Imaging: Low DR Imaging Wide DR Imaging Dynamic Range quantifies the ability of a sensor to image highlights and shadows. Goal of Our Project: Improve the Dynamic Range of the CMOS Sensor

  5. What is a CMOS Sensor? • It is an image sensor produced by a CMOS semiconductor process. • It consists of a photodiode and extra circuitry next to each photodiode converting the light energy to a voltage, later the voltage is converted to a digital signal.

  6. What is a Comparator? a comparator is a device that compares two voltages and switches its output to indicate which is larger. • A good comparator implementation can be an Operational Amplifier connected in open loop.

  7. The Use of the Comparator in a WDR Sensor: • If a pixel value exceeds the threshold - i.e. the pixel is expected to be saturated at the end of the exposure time - the reset is given at that time to that pixel. The binary information concerning the reset (i.e., if it is applied or not) is saved in a digital storage for later calculation of the scaling factor. Thus, we can represent the pixel output in the following floating- point format: M⋅2EXP. Here, the mantissa (M) represents the digitized pixel value, and the exponent (EXP) represents the scaling factor. • This way, the maximal signal value the sensor can process is raised – higher DR.

  8. Project Process Flow Specifications Choose Suitable Comparator Topologies Design Procedures Set-up to determent W/L (each Topology) Full SPECTRA simulation Remaining Tasks

  9. Our Project: Design a High Precision Comparator to Implement a WDR Sensor • Technology - TOWER 180nm • The Comparator’s Design Requirements: • Gain = 1000 • Bandwidth = 1 - 2 MHz • Slew Rate > 1.8 V/µsec • Power Dissipation < 100nW • CLoad= 150 fF • 0V < Vout < 3.3V • 0.2V < Vin < 2V GBW = 1-2 GHz

  10. Project Process Flow Specifications Choose Suitable Comparator Topologies Design Procedures Set-up to determent W/L (each Topology) Full SPECTRA simulation Remaining Tasks

  11. Comparator Topologies • Simple One-Stage • Two-Stage • Folded Cascode • Gain Boosted Folded Cascode

  12. Project Process Flow Specifications Choose Suitable Comparator Topologies Design Procedures Set-up to determent W/L (each Topology) Full SPECTRA simulation Remaining Tasks

  13. Simple One-Stage Comparator • The topology resulted in poor performance, due to poor gain and bandwidth

  14. Two-Stage Comparator Active Load Bias Current Differential Pair Enable Switch Common Source Amplifier Current Mirror

  15. ENABLE=ON ENABLE=OFF Two-Stage Comparator cont. • Results: Gain, BW Power Dissipation Slew Rate GBW = Gain*BW= (62.03dB)*1.4MHz = 1.769GHz All the design requirements were met!

  16. Folded Cascode Comparator Current Source Cascode Transistors Differential Pair Common Source Amplifier Bias Circuit Current Mirror

  17. Folded Cascode Comparator cont. ENABLE = ON ENABLE=OFF Power Dissipation Slew Rate Gain, BW GBW = Gain*BW= (60.12dB)*1.36MHz = 1.379GHz Results: All the design requirements were met!

  18. Project Process Flow Specifications Choose Suitable Comparator Topologies Design Procedures Set-up to determent W/L (each Topology) Full SPECTRA simulation Remaining Tasks

  19. Full SPECTRA simulation • DC analysis – make sure all transistors are in saturation mode • AC analysis – find a suitable W/L for the desired Gain, BW and GBW. • Transient analysis – checks the Slew Rate, and Power Dissipation. • Now, Corners were checked.

  20. Project Process Flow Specifications Choose Suitable Comparator Topologies Design Procedures Set-up to determent W/L (each Topology) Full SPECTRA simulation Remaining Tasks

  21. Remaining Tasks • Create and check Gain Boosted Folded Cascode topology. • Comparison of all topologies designed in this project. • Layout Implementation of the best topology and post layout simulations.

  22. Questions תודה רבה!

More Related