1 / 22

Michelle Henwood Statewide Behaviour Intervention Service

Service Provision For People with Intellectual Disability and SPIED: Issues in Translating Theory into Practice. Michelle Henwood Statewide Behaviour Intervention Service. Session Outline. SERVICE DELIVERY CONSIDERATIONS A CASE EXAMPLE & SERVICE MODEL QUESTIONS. SPIED Symposium.

dexter
Download Presentation

Michelle Henwood Statewide Behaviour Intervention Service

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Service Provision For People with Intellectual Disability and SPIED: Issues in Translating Theory into Practice Michelle Henwood Statewide Behaviour Intervention Service

  2. Session Outline • SERVICE DELIVERY CONSIDERATIONS • A CASE EXAMPLE & SERVICE MODEL • QUESTIONS

  3. SPIED Symposium • A conceptualisation of Personality Disorder in Intellectual Disability & Assessment Framework • An Intervention Framework • Translating theory into practice

  4. Service Delivery Considerations Service Resilience Breakdown & worldview Long-term Service Set-Up: • stakeholder involvement & agreement • documentation • communication • role clarity • robust systemic supports Service Recovery Plan

  5. Service Delivery Considerations Duty of Care vs. Dignity of Risk • Informed consent? OPG ? • Senior management contract sign-off • Legal advice (DADHC & NGO) • Pressure off direct care staff Minimising Risk • Short-term vs. long-term risk • Risk assessment • Risk Management Plan : built into communication procedures & local service protocols eg. Hospitals protocol

  6. Service Delivery Considerations Case Ownership by Disability Services • Providing a voluntary service to a seemingly involuntary client • This group ARE our clients • Plans are still needed: maybe Case Plans before IP’s. Resistance & uncertainty re. new approach • Staff training & involvement re. SPIED framework • Shift to complement current practice with new way of thinking & conceptualising • Patience, respect, perseverance, reassurance, & negotiation

  7. Service Delivery Considerations Supporting Personal Boundaries • Risk of blurred boundaries for staff & clients • Supervision & support • Guidelines for consistency Expect the Crisis / Expect the Recovery • Relates to Set-Up expectations & undertakings (agreements) • Give staff skills and training to respond to crisis (IPRP)

  8. So, how could this framework look within a service model?

  9. A Case Example - Melissa WORLD VIEW “I will be abandoned” “I can’t trust anyone” THEMES OF BEHAVING “If I’m in control no-one can hurt me” “Reject them before they reject me” SYMPTOMATIC BEHAVIOURS • Physical aggression (punching, pushing) • Theft (eg. food & clothing) • Property damage (own & others) • Self-harm (cutting arms & stomach) • Poor self-care & health management

  10. A Case Example - Impact SELF - PERVASIVE PATTERN FOR PAST 6 YEARS • Repeated placement in custody & released to new accommodation • Itinerant / homeless lifestyle • No significant relationships • Physical & mental health deterioration • Frequent contact with police, mental health, hospitals • Serious risks associated with behaviours, health, & lifestyle.

  11. A Case Example - Impact • FAMILY & COMMUNITY MEMBERS • Family relationships broken down • Community member injury, loss, & distress • SERVICES • Multiple service providers involved – inconsistent responses – unclear roles • Rarely able to implement because no contact – frustration & withdrawal of services • Functioning in “crisis mode” – huge drain on resources for every service involved

  12. The initial goal is to create structure and predictability around the “crisis” nature of Melissa’s lifestyle. To offer a similar level of variety and stimulation to her current lifestyle whilst minimising risk to herself & others Work with Melissa’s itinerant behaviour by providing more than one “safe base” Facilitate increased predictability, safety, and eventually increased stability & connection to one identified “home” Service Aims

  13. SERVICE MODEL for Melissa Northern Region Case Coordinator & Clinician Short Term Secure Placement Sydney: Primary Residence Southern Region

  14. Short-term secure placement Northern Region Case Coordinator & Clinician Short Term Secure Placement Sydney: Primary Residence Southern Region

  15. Primary Residence – Cluster Model Northern Region Case Coordinator & Clinician Short Term Secure Placement Sydney: Primary Residence Southern Region

  16. Regional supports - Aims Statewide contact with government departments • Need for local & statewide protocols and agreements. Safe bases & Relationships - Create a relationship with an organisation, not just one person. - Create a choice of safe bases : planned not emergency services.

  17. Regional Supports -contact -office -schedule Case Coordinator & Clinician Short Term Secure Placement -contact -office -schedule - contact -office -schedule - respite

  18. Centralised Coordinator & Clinician Northern Region Case Coordinator & Clinician Short Term Secure Placement Sydney: Primary Residence Southern Region

  19. “Phone a friend” • One phone number • Toll free or reverse charges for Melissa & other identified services. • Case Coordinator during business hours & Contact Persons roster after hours. • Provision of support, schedule information, central communication point – streamlining & simplicity.

  20. In a nutshell … • There are many issues and barriers to translating theory into practice for this client group • It is very possible to do this with commitment, clarity, creativity, and understanding. • Acceptance that this is not a quick fix or an easy road is essential to achieving positive outcomes • This is just one example of how this intervention framework could be interpreted.

  21. Questions / Comments

  22. Michelle Henwood Statewide Behaviour Intervention Service michelle.henwood@dadhc.nsw.gov.au

More Related