1 / 14

fossil fuel taxation and subsidy policies FFRE workshop, 12-16 May 2014 , Mauritius

fossil fuel taxation and subsidy policies FFRE workshop, 12-16 May 2014 , Mauritius . Ministry of Environment and Energy Republic of Maldives. COUTRY OVERVIEW. 1192 beautiful tropical islands 190 inhabited islands 107 Tourist Resorts

devaki
Download Presentation

fossil fuel taxation and subsidy policies FFRE workshop, 12-16 May 2014 , Mauritius

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. fossil fuel taxation and subsidy policies FFRE workshop, 12-16 May 2014, Mauritius Ministry of Environment and Energy Republic of Maldives

  2. COUTRY OVERVIEW • 1192 beautiful tropical islands • 190 inhabited islands • 107 Tourist Resorts • 60 Industrial/agricultural islands • Population of 350,759 • Land area: 300 km2 • 6-8% GDP growth annually • Only 1-2 % of the country is land • 80% of land just over a meter above sea level

  3. ENERGY SECTOR HIGHLIGHTS • Depend almost entirely on foreign imports • Oil imports • USD 470M in 2012 and USD 487M in 2013 • Most oil vulnerable country • Close to 31% of GDP spent in 2012 • 2009 CO2 emissions was • 1.3 Million tCO2eq & 4.0 tCO2eq/person/year • Under a business as usual scenario, emissions could double by 2020 • Heavily subsidized electricity sector

  4. electricity subsidies

  5. THE SUSTAINABILITY CHALLENGE • Deteriorating fiscal situation mostly driven by rising expenditures; • Deficit about ~ 16% GDP • Cash deficit ~ 13.4% GDP • Significant role played by electricity subsidies: • • Spending on electricity subsidies increased five fold between 2010 and 2012, going from 90 Million MVR in 2010 to 458 Million in 2012 • • Electricitysubsidies~1.4%GDP

  6. THE AFFORDABILITY CHALLENGE • long history of subsidizing electricity consumption motivated by high cost of energy due to: • • Reliance on imports (vulnerability to intl. price/exchange rate shocks ...) • • Lack of diversification in energy sources • Households spend a significant proportion of their budget on electricity, especially poorer households (6.5 % and 8.6 respectively) • Electricity subsidies both in the form of • • Cross subsidies (higher to lower consumption bands, IBT tariff) • • Explicit subsidies • Fuel Surcharge Subsidy (FSS) • Usage Subsidy (US)

  7. CROSS SUBSIDIES Electricity pricing follow an Increasing Block Tariff structure: households pays different prices on their consumed units for each “block” covered by their consumption (cross subsidies).

  8. EXPLICIT SUBSIDIES – USAGE SUBSIDY Introduced to limit impact of 2009 price reform on lower consumption bands

  9. EXPLICIT SUBSIDIES – FUEL SURCHARGE SUBSIDY • 2009 Reform: introduction of Fuel Surcharge –utility providers allowed to automatically raise tariff to reflect changes in fuel cost above a threshold. • • Example: STELCO - for each 0.1 Mrf/liter increase in fuel prices above 8 Mrf/liter, tariff increased by Mrf 0.03 per kWh • • Fuel Surcharge Subsidy: Introduced to offset Fuel Surcharge impact on consumers’ bill.

  10. Cost of Explicit Subsidies Increased 5 Fold Between 2010-12 due to • Relaxation of eligibility criteria • Increase in international prices of fuel • Currency devaluation

  11. EFFCIENCY COSTS • DEMAND SIDE: • Real value of electricity bill declined over time: Households (more than) fully insulated from changes in the cost of electricity. • No incentives toward “responsible” consumption; Over-consumption? • SUPPLY SIDE: • Utility providers fully insulated from changes in the cost of production. • No incentives toward improvements of efficiency levels

  12. REFORM Two approaches being considered 1. FSS coverage to vary by slab of each unit of electricity consumed (original Government proposal) 2. FSS coverage based on total volume of electricity consumed– all units receive the FSS coverage of the last unit consumed

  13. THANK YOU

More Related