Connection between valuation standards and real estate appraisal procedure a country based approach
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 18

Maile Kajak, consultant Colliers International Estonia Kaarel Sahk, lecturer PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 118 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Connection between valuation standards and real estate appraisal procedure (A country based approach). Maile Kajak, consultant Colliers International Estonia Kaarel Sahk, lecturer Estonian University of Life Sciences June 2010. SUBJECT CHOICE.

Download Presentation

Maile Kajak, consultant Colliers International Estonia Kaarel Sahk, lecturer

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Connection between valuation standards and real estate appraisal procedure a country based approach

Connection between valuation standards and real estate appraisal procedure (A country based approach)

Maile Kajak, consultant

Colliers International Estonia

Kaarel Sahk, lecturer

Estonian University of Life Sciences

June 2010


Subject choice

SUBJECT CHOICE

  • Quality of valuation reports is very different:

    • In spite the national standardization, no solid and confidential valuation report form

  • To problematic issues is given too little attention:

    • no recurrent analysis of problematic issues;

    • the sanctions for poor quality of valuation reports are too soft;

    • little traininglevel of real estate appraisers


Objectives of research

OBJECTIVES of research

  • To make andclarifya summary of the main mistakes and the deviations from the Estonian Valuation Standards

  • To give, if it is available proposals for standards

  • To draw attention and underlinethe necessary training topics among appraisers


Builtup research

Builtup research


Data and methodology

DATA AND METHODOLOGY

  • Valuation cases processed by the Estonian Association of real Estate Appraisers

    • Total: 82 differentcases

  • The results of audit of certified appraisers

    • Total: 25 audit reports

  • The results of the questionnaire based on valuation cases and audit results

    • Total: 52 answers


Results analysis of valuation cases 1

RESULTSAnalysis of valuation cases (1)

  • Distribution of case filers:


Results analysis of valuation cases 2

RESULTSAnalysis of valuation cases (2)

  • The main reasons for filing the cases:

    • large difference between valuation results;

    • low valuation result;

    • mistakes in valuation object description.


Results analysis of valuation cases 3

RESULTSAnalysis of valuation cases (3)

  • Main mistakes:

    • unrealistic assumptions;

    • the appraiser has not considered the restrictions and lease agreements encumbering the object;

    • the appraiser has not analysed the highest and best use of the object;


Results analysis of valuation cases 4

RESULTSAnalysis of valuation cases (4)

  • Main mistakes:

    • the information about building permits and certificates of occupancy has not been brought out;

    • valuators do not often explain why the specific valuation methodology has been implemented;

    • appraisers mix up capitalization rate and discount rate and the terms value, price and cost


Results analysis of audit results 1

RESULTSAnalysis of audit results (1)

  • The main mistakes are similar to valuation cases analysis results

  • Estimations given to certified appraisers during auditing – “good”, “satisfactory” or “non sufficient”


Results analysis of questionnaire answers 1

RESULTS Analysis of questionnaire answers (1)

  • Distribution of appraisers, who answered to the questionnaire:


Results analysis of questionnaire answers 2

RESULTS Analysis of questionnaire answers (2)


Conclusions 1

Conclusions (1)

  • The general quality of the valuation reports has improved (EVS have an important role)

  • Standard mistakes are repeated

  • The national valuation standards need a review

  • The full paradigm of appraisal procedure needs to be standardized


Conclusions 2

CONCLUSIONS (2)

  • FAQ

  • The need for trainings and seminars on the subjects of valuation like

    • Valuation of special purpose properties and complex objects

    • legislation,

    • economics and

    • financial topics


Conclusions 3

CONCLUSIONS (3)

  • LLL

  • Theoretically knowledge requirements

  • Previous education and experience assessment


Additional information

Additional information

  • This presentation is based on the master thesis of Mrs. Kajak“THE QUALITY PROBLEMS OF PROFESSIONAL REAL ESTATE VALUATIONIN ESTONIA“

  • Thesis were defended in December 2009.


Maile kajak consultant colliers international estonia kaarel sahk lecturer

  • Contact adresses for further information:[email protected]@emu.ee

  • According the current presentation the empirically paper will be copiled.


Maile kajak consultant colliers international estonia kaarel sahk lecturer

Thank You for listening!


  • Login