1 / 18

Race and crime

Race and crime. One in three African American males ages 20-29 are under some form of correctional supervision in the U.S. Proportion has doubled since WW II Also victimized at higher rates. Prison populations. In 1926, 75-80% of inmates were white Today, around 50%

denise
Download Presentation

Race and crime

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Race and crime • One in three African American males ages 20-29 are under some form of correctional supervision in the U.S. • Proportion has doubled since WW II • Also victimized at higher rates

  2. Prison populations • In 1926, 75-80% of inmates were white • Today, around 50% • 1926: about 20% of inmates were African American • Now around 50% • Gap began to narrow noticeably in the 1970s

  3. Theoretical explanations • Biological unlikely—does not account for the changes • Poorer prenatal care and nutrition might contribute a biological factor, but there are social roots to this problem • Most explanations sociological

  4. Theoretical explanations • Moynihan report • Economic factors • Poverty (1/2 of AF Am children live below the poverty line); Hispanics • Barriers to employment and education • However, do not explain the increase • Relative deprivation

  5. Income distribution • 1% of the population owns 40% of the wealth • The top 20% own 80% of the wealth • The top 20% have become wealthier over the last 40 years • The bottom 20% has lost ground

  6. Theoretical explanations • Ecological research: migration from the rural South beginning in the 1920s and 1930s. • Durkheim and alienation • Culture conflict, Conflict theory • Examples of conflict theory

  7. The role of the CJS • 14th amendment guarantees equal protection • Post Civil War amendment • Rules out arbitrary and unreasonable government classifications • Does not prohibit “reasonable” classifications (I.e., children v. adults)

  8. 14th amendment • There must be a relationship between classification and a legitimate governmental purpose • If a law impinges on a fundamental right, then the state must have a “compelling state interest” • Suspect classifications: race, national origin, illegitimacy, gender (??)

  9. Police • Most riots in U.S. have been sparked by incidents involving the police • Young low-income men have the most negative views of the police • Police brutality • Stop and frisks • Searches (more likely to get caught)

  10. Police • Profiling

  11. Courts • Jury selection • Challenges for cause and peremptory challenges • Swain v. Alabama • Reversed in Batson v. KY: race based peremptory challenges violated EP • Little effect

  12. Courts • Legal representation • Much of the debate has been over private v. public defenders • Not a consistent pattern. The research does not get at quality of representation • Bail

  13. Plea bargaining • Prosecutors more willing to offer concession for less serious crimes, fewer priors, weak evidence • A number of studies suggest that whites get better deals, although studies in some states find that it makes no difference • “Substantial assistance”

  14. Juvenile Justice • Minorities more likely to be formally processed • More likely to be transferred to adult court

  15. Sentencing • Partially dependent on race of victim and offender • Majority of crime is intraracial • (exception: Native American Indians) • For some types of crimes, sentencing of African American is longer if the victim is white

  16. Sentencing • For some very serious crimes, race appears to make little difference • Death penalty • Baldus study • A minority murderer with a white victim were more likely to get the death penalty

  17. Death penalty • Race of the victim, rather than the offender, had the greatest impact on the outcome • McKlesky v Kemp (1987) • Used this study to challenge the imposition of the death penalty • Court ruled that he had not shown discrimination in his individual case

  18. Conclusions • Pure justice to systematic discrimination • U.S. in the middle • Minorities treated more harshly at some stages, no differently at others • Variation from jurisdiction to jurisdiction

More Related