Enterprise

1. Enterprise Peg David AIM Technical Program Manager NETPDTC N621 23 APRIL 2013

2. Overview • Enterprise AIM I/AIM II & CPM eDMZ Transition • Authority to Operate (ATO) • SSC NOLA Enterprise Data Center Migration • SSC NOLA Citrix – Risk • Issues • Non-NETC Sites/Commands • AIM Content Repository Requirements • Configuration Control Board (CCB)

3. AIM Central Site Hosting at NETPDTC • NETC N74/N6, NETPDTC & NAWCTSD Migration Plan • 18 FEB – 24 APR - Completed eDMZ Migration • All NETC Learning Centers and SSP • Content, databases, processing, Citrix NTSS Accounts • Benefits • Simultaneous access by geographically dispersed Center and contractor personnel for collaborative development and maintenance • Positions AIM Enterprise for SPAWAR New Orleans (NOLA) Enterprise Data Center Transition (NEDC) • Lessons Learned • RADM Quinn – BZ!

4. GovernmentCPM Hosting • CPM in Aimereon/vendor site – Sunset 12 APR • CPM in NETPDTC eDMZ deployed – 15 APR • https://cpm.prod.aim.netc.navy.mil • Benefits • Enterprise production hosting and support vs current contractor environment with limited server configuration and bandwidth • Leverages NETC domain Sys Admin, Database Management, and Information Assurance expertise at NETPDTC and SSC NOLA • Co-located with rest of NETC enterprise IT applications; secure access from both .mil and .com domains

5. AIM ATO Status • 3-year ATO granted by FLTCYBERCOM 26 Dec 12 • Allowed us to proceed with migration of AIM I/II Central Site instances into NMCI eDMZ and hosting CPM in eDMZ vs vendor site • ATO POAM CAT III – deployment of CAC for Application Jun/July timeframe (T) • Certification & Accreditation (C&A) artifacts are routinely kept updated; used for annual FISMA reviews, etc, living documents • Migration to SPAWAR NOLA requires modified ATO to support NEDC environment

6. AIM Central Site Migration to NOLA NEDC • Goal: Hardware/system software infrastructure in place SSC NOLA by 30 SEP 13 • Schedule for operational transition/deployment from current NETPDTC eDMZ host to NOLA host TBD • Lessons Learned - Transition plan similar to recent eDMZ migration – Application Functional Testing (AFT); Production cutover • Management of AIM I/II/LO Module Central Sites and CPM will remain with NETPDTC; only physical hosting moves to NOLA • NEDC Remote Access: GFE or CFE required for SPAWAR CITRIX access – discussions in progress

7. Risk ManagementNEDC Remote Access Description: (1) For Off-site Users - GFE or CFE is required for SPAWAR CITRIX access -- Govt Furnished Equipment (GFE) = property acquired directly by Govt and made available to contractor; and, -- Corporate Furnished Equipment (CFE) = equipment purchased by DoD/Govt contracted company specifically in support of DoD/Govt contract; used only by personnel supporting that contract High Low Medium Probability 10 30 50 70 90 Mitigation Plan: -- NETPDTC team provided current AIM Citrix STIG mitigations; architecture to NOLA team -- SPAWAR NOLA team discussed separate AIM APP Citrix instance vs shared Citrix Farm -- Technical options for AIM Users – discussions forthcoming AIM Engineering Mtgs Apr; arrive at consensus 1 2 3 4 5 Impact

8. Issue:Privilege Levels • 5 levels implemented in Central Site AIM II per CNATT request • 3 levels implemented in Central Site AIM I per SSP request • CPM-style role/privilege structure tasked and funded by NETC N74/NAWCTSD

9. Issue:Hosting Test Environment • NMCI AIM users needed to test ongoing system enhancements as part of formal Govt Acceptance Testing (GAT) process • Cannot install in-process AIM updates on local NMCI PCs or access contractor-hosted virtual server to conduct tests • NETPDTC to establish Test Environment to support ongoing requirement

10. Issue:Blocking Word Macros • NMCI does not allow MSWord macros to be enabled on NMCI desktop PCs once Win 7/Office 2010 is installed • This poses crippling limitation on TG functionality for stand-alone desktop installations of AIM under NMCI; no work-around has yet been identified • Does not affect AIM Central site instances inside eDMZ

11. Issue:Software Release Process • All Central Site instances now migrated to Rel 5.0 • CNATT requirement to maintain local NMCI AIM II instances to support effective community-wide business process • Discussion re NMCI certification process / schedule • Impact of NMCI certification delay / push of Rel 5.0

12. Issue: NOFORN NNPI • Affects primarily non-SWS undersea community – NAVSEA 07TR, SLC & SLC learning sites • Stringent data handling controls re unclassified No Foreign Dissemination Navy Nuclear Power Information (NNPI), mandated by NAVSEA 08 • NETC/NETPDTC stood up TRANET-C NNPI COI to host: • SLC reference materials, e-library, IETMs, course curriculum info, AIM content, used by SLC/DETs • TRANET-C NNPI COI use/rqmts by other LCs TBD • POC: Bruce Bare, NETC

13. Non-NETC Commands Implementation • Non-NETC Commands interest in AIM Enterprise • Prioritizing in Process • NSTC (OTC/RTC) – in process • Navy Medicine • NAVSPECWARCEN (hosted by NAVSOC) • NAVRES • DANTES • Regional Maintenance Centers – Norfolk / San Diego • Naval Shipyards - hosted Norfolk

14. AIM Content Repository • Enterprise Requirements’ for Ancillary Data Storage Area • AIM Enterprise has multiple components: AIM I, AIM II, CPM, LO and ancillary file shares • Requires configuration management; search; access by enterprise users • Notional Plan • Complete Functional Requirements Document • H2 assisting – collate input/requirements provided from LCs • FY14 goal/priority

15. Configuration Control Board (CCB) • NETC Instruction 5200.3 – established authoritative framework for effective & innovative configuration compliance for IM/IT as it relates to NETC WD Line of Business -- Each T&E App has Charter; Chairpersons: PM and TPMs • Purpose of CCB: ensure programmatic changes (i.e., consideration of proposed cost and schedule changes) and related technical changes to information systems are processed in a visible and traceable manner • AIM CCB membership – commands/vendors (as applicable): • NETC N74 Program Manager (PM) – Michael Mosley • NETC N741A Deputy Program Manager (DPM) – Leslie Desenburg • NETPDTC N621 Technical Program Manager (TPM) – Peg David • NETPDTC Information Assurance (IAM/IAO) – Kelley Harris or designated IAO • NETPDTC System Development Team – Christopher Stark; when applicable • NAWCTSD Application Technical Program Manager (TPM) – Tiffany Dombrowski • NAWCTSD System Dev/Trng Team – Mike Matzko / Mike Coyle • AIMEREON Application Team – Jim Ferrall and AIMEREON staff as identified; when applicable • NETC Learning Centers – Representatives as identified via the AIM FRB; when applicable • SSP and other Navy Commands Using Enterprise AIM – Representatives as identified via the AIM FRB – when applicable

16. CCB (cont) • CCB Forum • Participants get together discuss (specified work/projects) which need to be completed • Responsible agents are assigned for performing agreed-upon work • Decisions/assigned actions are recorded when completed • Includes: providing tech support during development of decision support documentation such as: Requests for Information Services (RIS), System Functionality Assessments (SFA), Analysis of Alternatives (AOA), Independent Cost Estimates (ICE), and Software Change Requests (SCR), etc. • CCB shall review, adjudicate, elevate, or place on hold proposed changes for adjudication as required • CCB shall reach a decision after a period of presentation and discussion, at which time the Chairperson may poll members for their position or recommendation • CCB Chairperson(s) shall make all final decisions • Held ICW AIM FRB Meetings; or on more frequent basis; when applicable

17. AIM Central Site Implementation • Points of contact: • NETC N74: Mike Mosley, Leslie Desenburg • NETPDTC: Peg David, Christopher Stark • NAWCTSD: Tiffany Dombrowski, Mike Matzko • AIMEREON: Jim Ferrall, Steve Wicinski, Mike Coyle • NETPDTC Enterprise/Central Site specifics, narrated help videos, lessons learned - available on AIM information Web page: • http://aim.aimereon.com/aim/AIM-Central-Site-Hosting-at-NETPDTC.ashx

18. Questions?

19. Enterprise Training Management FrameworkContinuous Process ImprovementETMF Status UpdateBruce Bare, NETC N62Jon Sullivan, H2 Performance Consulting, Corp 23 April 2013

20. Topics • ETMF Phase II Goals & Deliverables • Roadmap Results to Date • Current Roadmapping Activities • Roadmap Development Schedule

21. ETMF – Phase II Goals • Document and analyze “As-Is” state of core business processes required to develop, manage and deliver training curricula • Identify duplication, inefficiencies, process improvement opportunities • Determine most efficient alignment of core training management systems • Recommend strategies that will support NETC’s ability to continue quality & quantity of education while controlling (reducing) costs Deliverables Inventory Management Process Recommendation – Delivered Mar 2013 Assessments Tool Recommendation – Planned Jun 2013 Delivery NETC Enterprise Technology Roadmap – Planned Sep 2013 Delivery

22. Roadmap Results To-Date Business / Service Workshops: COMPLETED Technology Workshops: COMPLETED • Participating Teams • NETC N72, N73, N74 • CPPD • CNATT • CID • LAS Team • NETPDTC N612 • NETPDTC N621 *Data not represented • Sample Data Pool • 53 Participants • 328 Responses

23. Roadmap Responses to Date Gap Areas by Category Number of Responses

24. Current Roadmapping Activities • Data Gathering • Remaining Technical Workshop Input • Data Validation • Workshop & Focus Group Data Analysis • Findings Validation Survey Analysis • Gap Analysis • Results Documentation • Roadmap Initiative Groupings • Roadmap Initiative Worksheets • Charting Workshop Planning • Customizing Roadmap Templates • Identifying Industry Trends

25. Roadmap Development Schedule Progress as of 23 April 2013 Feb March April May June July August September Workshop 3 Technology Workshops 1 & 2 Workshop 4 Charting Final Deliverable ConstraintReview Draft Review Documentation & Validation Documentation & Validation Documentation, Validation & Analysis Validation & Draft Prep Charting

26. Questions?