Race and space in urban america perspectives from census 2000
Download
1 / 72

Race and Space in Urban America Perspectives from Census 2000 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 200 Views
  • Uploaded on

Race and Space in Urban America Perspectives from Census 2000. William H. Frey Population Studies Center University of Michigan and The Brookings Institution www.frey-demographer.org. Common Misperceptions from Census 2000. America is a diverse melting pot Cities are back

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Race and Space in Urban America Perspectives from Census 2000' - denim


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Race and space in urban america perspectives from census 2000 l.jpg

Race and Space in Urban AmericaPerspectives from Census 2000

William H. Frey

Population Studies Center

University of Michigan

and

The Brookings Institution

www.frey-demographer.org


Common misperceptions from census 2000 l.jpg
Common Misperceptions from Census 2000

  • America is a diverse melting pot

  • Cities are back

  • Racial segregation has not declined

  • Smaller households create "childless cities"

Source: William H. Frey, analysis of 2000 Census


America s new demographic regions l.jpg
America’s New Demographic Regions

  • The New Sunbelt

  • Melting Pot America

  • The Heartland

Source: William H. Frey, analysis of 2000 Census


Slide4 l.jpg

Fastest Growing, 1990 - 2000

Source: William H. Frey, analysis of 2000 Census


Selected new sunbelt and old sunbelt states l.jpg

Growth 1980s and 1990s

Selected New Sunbelt and Old Sunbelt States

Nevada

Colorado

Georgia

0

10

20

40

50

60

70

30

Florida

80s

Texas

90s

California

Source: William H. Frey, analysis of 2000 Census


Slide6 l.jpg

Immigrant Magnet States

Source: William H. Frey, analysis of 2000 Census


Slide7 l.jpg

New Sunbelt, Melting Pot,

and Heartland States

New Sunbelt

Melting Pot

Heartland States

Source: William H. Frey,


Slide8 l.jpg

Demographic Components, 1990s

California

New York

Texas

Immigration

Domestic Migration

Natural Increase

Source: William Frey.


Slide9 l.jpg

Demographic Components, 1990s

Colorado

Georgia

Pennsylvania

Immigration

Domestic Migration

Natural Increase

Source: William Frey


Immigration and domestic migration l.jpg
Immigration and Domestic Migration

Census Day 2000 - July 1, 2001


1900 2000 california transplants u s vs foreign origin l.jpg

Foreign Born

U.S. Born – Out of State

1900-2000 California Transplants U.S. vs. Foreign Origin

Source: William Frey


Share of u s in melting pot states l.jpg
Share of U.S. in Melting Pot States

Foreign Born 70%

Asian Language at Home 68%

Spanish at Home 76%

Mixed Marriages 51%

Native Born 37%

English at Home 34%

Source: William Frey.


10 classic immigrant magnet metros l.jpg

90 - 99 Immigrants

1. New York ------------- 1,408,543

2. Los Angeles ----------- 1,257,925

3. San Francisco --------- 494,189

4. Miami ------------------ 420,488

5. Chicago ----------------- 363,662

6. Washington ------------ 267,175

7. Houston ---------------- 214,262

8. Dallas-Fort ------------- 173,500

9. San Diego -------------- 159,691

10. Boston ------------------ 137,634

10 “Classic” Immigrant Magnet Metros

Source: William H. Frey, analysis of 2000 Census


Slide14 l.jpg

Domestic Migrant Magnet Metros

90 - 99 Net Migration

1. Atlanta ---------------- 498,283

2. Phoenix --------------- 396,092

3. Las Vegas ------------- 394,331

4. Dallas ------------------ 235,611

5. Denver ----------------- 200,658

6. Portland, OR ----------- 198,896

7. Austin ------------------ 168,817

8. Orlando ---------------- 167,120

9. Tampa ----------------- 157,209

10. Charlotte --------------154,320

Source: William H. Frey, analysis of 2000 Census


Hispanic concentration 2000 l.jpg
Hispanic Concentration2000

Source: William H Frey,


1990 2000 greatest hispanic gainers l.jpg

1.Los Angeles 1,819,370

2. New York 992,185

3. Chicago 600,810

4. Dallas 594,836

5. Houston 575,098

6. Miami 501,543

1990 - 2000 Greatest Hispanic Gainers

Source: William H. Frey, analysis of 2000 Census


Slide17 l.jpg

Up- and Coming Hispanic Growth Magnets

2000 Populations > 50,000

  • %Growth

  • 1. Greensboro 694

  • 2. Charlotte 622

  • 3. Raleigh 569

  • 4. Atlanta 362

  • 5. Las Vegas 262

  • 6. Portland, OR 175

  • 7. Orlando 170

  • 8. Minn. -St. Paul 162

  • 9. Reno 145

  • 10. Grand Rapids 136

  • 11. Salt Lake City 133

  • Source: William H. Frey, analysis of 2000 Census


    Asian concentration 2000 l.jpg
    Asian Concentration2000

    Source: William H Frey,


    1990 2000 greatest asian gainers l.jpg
    1990 – 2000 Greatest Asian Gainers

    1. New York 710,809

    2. Los Angeles 611,201

    3. San Francisco 554,326

    Source: William H. Frey, analysis of 2000 Census


    Slide20 l.jpg

    Up- and Coming Asian Growth Magnets

    2000 Populations > 50,000

    • %Growth

  • 1. Las Vegas 286

  • 2. Atlanta 200

  • 3. Austin 175

  • 4 . Orlando 171

  • 5. Tampa 149

  • 6. Phoenix 149

  • 7. Dallas 133

  • 8. Portland OR 119

  • 9. Minn. - St. Paul 118

  • 10. Denver 115

  • 11.Miami 113

  • Source: William H. Frey, analysis of 2000 Census


    Black concentration 2000 l.jpg
    Black Concentration2000

    Source: William H Frey,


    Slide22 l.jpg

    1990 - 2000 Greatest Black Gainers

    1. Atlanta 459,582

    2. New York 450,725

    3. Washington DC 358,727

    4. Miami 241,492

    5. Chicago 181,101

    6. Dallas 176,293

    7. Philadelphia 162,932

    8. Houston 142,304

    Source: William H. Frey, analysis of 2000 Census


    Slide23 l.jpg

    1990 - 2000 Major Black Growth Centers

    (Over 200,000 blacks and 30% growth)

    • % Growth

  • 1. Orlando 62.2

  • 2. Atlanta 61.9

  • 3. Miami 43.4

  • 4. Tampa 36.8

  • 5. Charlotte 34.7

  • 6. Columbus, OH 34.6

  • 7. Jacksonville, FL 34.3

  • 8. Boston 33.8

  • 9. Raleigh 33.1

  • 10. Dallas 31.7

  • Source: William H. Frey, analysis of 2000 Census


    White concentration 2000 l.jpg
    White Concentration2000

    Source: William H Frey,


    Slide25 l.jpg

    1990 - 2000 Greatest White Decliners

    1. Los Angeles -843.065

    2. New York -679,790

    3. San Francisco -269,844

    4. Philadelphia -199,359

    5. Miami -118,506

    6. Chicago -93,794

    7. San Diego -84,448

    8. Pittsburgh -81,900

    Source: William H. Frey, analysis of 2000 Census


    Slide26 l.jpg

    1990 - 2000 Greatest White Gainers

    1. Phoenix 434,195

    2. Atlanta 359,299

    3. Las Vegas 326,145

    4. Denver 278,445

    5. Dallas 255,208

    6. Portland OR 230,535

    7. Seattle 199,172

    8. Minn.St. Paul 191,127

    9. Austin 187,426

    10. Raleigh 171,168

    11. Charlotte 162,258

    12. Nashville 146,615

    Source: William H. Frey, analysis of 2000 Census


    Fastest white growth 1990 2000 l.jpg

    15 – 25%

    Over 25%

    Fastest White Growth, 1990-2000

    Source: William H. Frey


    Slide28 l.jpg

    White Dispersal to The New Sunbelt

    Source: William H. Frey,


    Slide29 l.jpg

    Greatest White Growth, 1990-2000

    GrowthCountyMetro Area

    175% Douglas, CO Denver

    110% Forsyth GA Atlanta

    99% Archuleta CO nonmet

    99% Elbert CO nonmet

    96% Park CO nonmet

    85% Paulding CO Atlanta

    85% Boise ID nonmet

    84% Henry GA Atlanta

    79% Custer CO nonmet

    79% Loudoun VA Washington DC 77% Summit WA nonmet

    76% Washington WA nonmet

    Source: William H. Frey,


    Slide30 l.jpg

    Immigrant Magnets

    Other Metros

    Non Metro

    Distribution by Metro Size, 2000

    White

    Non-White

    Source: William H. Frey, analysis of 2000 Census


    America s patchwork quilt l.jpg
    America’s Patchwork Quilt

    Source: William H Frey,


    Slide32 l.jpg

    20% and Over

    10% to 20%

    5% to 10%

    Under 5%

    Children Speaking Spanish at Home

    Source: William H. Frey, analysis of 2000 Census


    Slide33 l.jpg

    Families of Poverty Children

    Married Couples

    Female Head

    Male Head

    California

    Michigan

    6

    8

    25

    47

    45

    69



    Slide35 l.jpg

    CA Education ShiftsAdults, 1990-2000


    City revival is immigrant driven l.jpg

    City Revival is Immigrant Driven

    “White Flight” Continues


    Slide37 l.jpg

    Central City Growth Trends, 1960 - 2000

    Source: William H. Frey, analysis of 2000 Census


    Of areas with 1990s population gains l.jpg
    % of Areas with 1990s Population Gains

    Total Population

    Central Cities 71%

    Suburbs 94%

    White Population

    Central Cities 37%

    Suburbs 79%

    Source: William H. Frey, analysis of 2000 Census


    Gains by race 1990 2000 l.jpg
    Gains by Race, 1990-2000

    Whites

    Blacks

    Asians

    Hispanics

    Source: William H. Frey, analysis of 2000 Census


    Slide40 l.jpg

    Metro Area Categories:

    • Melting Pots

      (eg. LA, NY, Miami)

    • North-Largely White-Black

      (eg. Detroit, Cleveland)

    • North-Largely White

      ( eg. Pittsburgh, Minn-St Paul)

    • South-Largely White Black

      (eg. Atlanta, Raleigh)

    • South & West - Largely White

      (eg. Seattle, Denver, Tampa)


    City race compositions 2000 l.jpg
    City Race Compositions, 2000

    Source: William H. Frey, analysis of 2000 Census


    Melting pot metros l.jpg
    Melting Pot Metros

    Source: William Frey.


    North largely white black metros l.jpg
    North-Largely White-Black Metros

    Source: William Frey.


    South largely white black metros l.jpg
    South -Largely White-Black Metros

    Source: William Frey.


    Slide45 l.jpg

    White Growth, 1990-2000Atlanta Metro Area

    Gain: GT 50%

    Gain:10 - 50%

    Gain: 0 - 10%

    Loss: 0 -10%

    Loss: GT 10%


    Slide46 l.jpg

    White Growth, 1990-2000New York Metro Region

    Gain: GT 50%

    Gain:10 - 50%

    Gain: 0 - 10%

    Loss: 0 -10%

    Loss: GT 10%


    Minority suburbanization and integration is occurring for l.jpg
    Minority Suburbanization and Integration is occurring for:

    • Melting Pot Metros

    • Black-gaining Metros

    • Multiple Race Persons

    Source: William H. Frey, analysis of 2000 Census


    Slide48 l.jpg

    Trends in Minority Suburbanization

    Source: William H. Frey, analysis of 2000 Census


    Slide49 l.jpg

    City-Suburb Dissimilarity for Metro Types

    Source: William H. Frey, analysis of 2000 Census


    Suburb race compositions 2000 l.jpg
    Suburb Race Compositions, 2000

    Source: William H. Frey, analysis of 2000 Census


    Black white segregation metro areas 2000 l.jpg
    Black White SegregationMetro Areas, 2000

    Source: Frey, Myers


    Slide52 l.jpg

    Declines in Black Segregation 1980 - 2000

    • Seg Index Decline

  • Atlanta -15

  • Dallas -23

  • Houston -16

  • Charlotte -12

  • Raleigh -15

  • Orlando -27

  • Tampa -17

  • Source: William H. Frey, analysis of 2000 Census


    Large city segregation 2000 l.jpg
    Large City Segregation, 2000

    Black-White

    Chicago, Il 87

    Aurora, CO 33

    Hispanic-White

    Oakland,CA 70

    Jacksonville, FL 25

    Asian-White

    New Orleans 64

    Anaheim CA 20

    Source: Frey, Myers


    Slide54 l.jpg

    Black White SegregationBoomburbs, 2000

    Source: Frey, Myers


    Slide55 l.jpg

    Black White Mixed Race Persons Metro Segregation, 2000

    Source: Frey, Myers


    Slide56 l.jpg

    Exposure for Whites and Blacks

    New York Metro, 2000

    Whites

    Blacks

    W-B Mixed

    Hispanics

    Other

    Whites

    Blacks

    Asians

    Source: Frey, Myers


    Slide57 l.jpg

    Exposure for Whites and Asians

    San Francisco Metro, 2000

    Whites

    Asians

    W-A Mixed

    Hispanics

    Other

    Whites

    Blacks

    Asians

    Source: Frey, Myers


    Growing cities are attracting families l.jpg
    Growing cities are attracting families

    Suburbs are attracting smaller younger , boomer and older households

    Source: William H. Frey, analysis of 2000 Census


    Slide59 l.jpg

    Population and Household Growth

    1970 - 2000

    Source: William H. Frey


    Growing central cities 1990s l.jpg
    Growing Central Cities, 1990s

    Pop Rate HH Rate Diff:

    Las Vegas 85% 77% -8%

    Bakersfield 41% 34% -7%

    Austin 41% 38% -3%

    Phoenix 35% 28% -7%

    Fresno 21% 15% -6%

    Orange Co 21% 11% -10%

    Source: Frey, Myers


    Slide61 l.jpg

    City Growth by Household Type

    Source: William H. Frey


    Slide62 l.jpg

    City Growth by Household Type

    Source: William H. Frey


    Ozzie and harriet cities circa 2000 l.jpg
    Ozzie and Harriet Cities Circa 2000

    1. Santa Ana, CA 42

    2. Anaheim, CA 32

    3. San Jose, CA 30

    4. El Paso, TX 30

    5. Virginia Beach, VA 29

    6. Riverside, CA 28

    7. Arlington, TX 28

    8. Anchorage, AK 27

    9. Fresno, CA 25

    10. Colorado Springs, CO 25

    Source: William Frey


    Non family households over 65 l.jpg
    Non-Family Households-Over 65

    1. Pittsburgh, PA 14

    2. St. Louis, MO 13

    3. Miami, FL 12

    4. Louisville, KY 12

    5. Buffalo, NY 12

    6. Philadelphia, PA 12

    7. Baltimore, MD 11

    8. Cincinnati, OH 11

    9. Cleveland, OH 11

    10. Toledo, OH 11

    Source: William Frey.


    Slide65 l.jpg

    Growth by Age, 1990-2000

    Source: William H. Frey


    Slide66 l.jpg

    Asian/Other

    Hispanic

    black

    white

    Los Angeles - Race Profiles by Age

    Under 15

    15-64

    65+

    Source: William Frey.


    Slide67 l.jpg

    Asian/Other

    Hispanic

    black

    white

    Salt Lake City - Race Profiles by Age

    Under 15

    15-64

    65+

    Source: William Frey.


    Slide68 l.jpg

    Asian/Other

    Hispanic

    black

    white

    Detroit - Race Profiles by Age

    Under 15

    15-64

    65+

    Source: William Frey.


    Slide69 l.jpg

    Los Angeles – 2025

    Age Structure by Race-Ethnicity


    Slide70 l.jpg

    Detroit – 2025

    Age Structure by Race-Ethnicity


    Common misperceptions from census 200071 l.jpg
    Common Misperceptions from Census 2000

    • America is a diverse melting pot

    • Cities are back

    • Racial segregation has not declined

    • Smaller households create "childless cities"

    Source: William H. Frey, analysis of 2000 Census


    Useful websites l.jpg
    Useful Websites

    www.census.org www.CensusScope.org

    Source: William H. Frey, analysis of 2000 Census


    ad