1 / 23

EXPERIENCES WITH LEGISLATIVE BUDGET OFFICES

EXPERIENCES WITH LEGISLATIVE BUDGET OFFICES. Barry Anderson OECD Study Visit to the OECD by Members of the Jordanian Parliament Organized by SUNY/Jordan’s Legislative Strengthening Program/ Parliamentary Budget Office Paris, September 5, 2007. Outline. A Note About Me

demont
Download Presentation

EXPERIENCES WITH LEGISLATIVE BUDGET OFFICES

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. EXPERIENCES WITHLEGISLATIVE BUDGETOFFICES Barry Anderson OECD Study Visit to the OECD by Members of the Jordanian Parliament Organized by SUNY/Jordan’s Legislative Strengthening Program/ Parliamentary Budget Office Paris, September 5, 2007

  2. Outline • A Note About Me • Budgetary Information Needs of the Legislature • Legislature Involvement in Budgeting • A Nonpartisan, Independent, Objective Analytic Unit • Potential Value • Core Functions • Fundamental Characteristics • US Examples • Conclusions

  3. Congressional Budget Office General Accounting Office Office of Management & Budget A Note About Me: Experience in the US Congress & the White House, as well as IMF & OECD

  4. Budgetary Information Needs of the Legislature • Different from Executive; more emphasis on: • Simplicity • Transparency • Accountability • Needed for both Majority and Minority • Source need not necessarily be adversarial, but it must be independent

  5. Legislature Involvement in Budgeting • Preliminary information from OECD’s soon-to-be-released Survey of Budgeting Practices and Procedures • Formal powers of legislatures to amend proposed budgets • Listing of specialized budget research offices attached to the legislature • Summary of 2006 EC Survey on Fiscal Institutions

  6. Formal powers of legislatures to amend proposed budgets • Unrestricted: 18 • The legislature may make amendments, but only if it does not change the total surplus/deficit proposed by the executive: 5 • Other changes permitted: 3 • Changes prohibited or very limited: 4 [Greece, Ireland, Japan, South Korea]

  7. Specialized budget research office/unit to conduct analyses of the budget: Italy: N/A staff Japan: 21 staff Mexico: 20 staff Netherlands: 20 staff Portugal: 3 staff South Korea: 96 staff UK: 20 staff US: 235 staff Other responses: Belgium: some work by the 608 staff in Court of Audit Canada: to be established at the end of 2007 Finland: 4 staff in Finance Committee New Zealand: 5 staff in Finance Select Committee Poland: some staff in Bureau of Parliamentary Analysis Listing of specialized budget research offices attached to the legislature

  8. Summary of 2006 EC Survey on Fiscal Institutions • 22 independent fiscal institutions exist in 14 EU member states. • Most of these have been in place a long time and there is no visible growth trend. • The involvement of these institutions in the budgetary process mainly takes place through regular Parliamentary hearings. • 16 institutions issue normative statements or recommendations. Source: “Survey on Fiscal Rules and Institutions: Summary of First Results”, EC, Directorate General, Economic & Financial Affairs, Brussels, 4/04/2006, ECFIN/LM-JAC/REP52126/06-EN.

  9. A NONPARTISAN, INDEPENDENT, OBJECTIVE ANALYTIC UNIT • Issues Not Addressed • Potential Value • Value can change • Core Functions • Other functions • Fundamental Characteristics • Additional characteristics • US Examples • Conclusions

  10. Issues Not Addressed • Does an increased legislative role lead to bigger deficits? • Does an increased legislative role lead to more “pork barrel” spending? • Can an independent unit help either of the above? • But I will address the benefits such a unit can have in reaching a better balance between the executive and the legislature.

  11. POTENTIAL VALUE • Eliminate executive’s information monopoly • Simplifies complexity • Promotes transparency • Enhances credibility • Promotes accountability • Improves budget process • Serves both majority & minority • Provides rapid responses

  12. VALUE CAN CHANGE • Value At Creation • More Information for Legislature relative to Executive • Value After Creation • More Information for Minority Parties relative to Majority

  13. CORE FUNCTIONS • Economic Forecasts • Baseline Estimates • Analysis of Executive’s Budget Proposals • Medium Term Analysis

  14. I: ECONOMIC FORECASTS • Objective • Not a function of policy proposals - not “dynamic” • Not based on wishful thinking - no rosy scenario • Not a means to an end - for example, interest rates, & oil & crop prices should be estimates, not targets • Conservative - allows for better-than-forecasted performance to reduce deficits/debt • “Centrist”, based on: • Panel of experts • Private forecasters • Central Bank

  15. II: BASELINE ESTIMATES • Projections, not Predictions • “Centrist” Economic Forecast • Current Law Basis, including • “Spend Out” of Enacted Legislation • Termination of Expiring Legislation • Medium Term Focus • Replaces Previous Year & Executive Baselines

  16. III: ANALYSIS OF EXECUTIVE’S BUDGET PROPOSALS • An objective budgetary assessment • A technical review - not a programmatic evaluation • Enhances credibility – both of government as a whole and of executive forecasts

  17. IV: MEDIUM TERM ANALYSIS • Forces executive to look beyond one year • Estimates medium term economic and fiscal impacts of policy proposals • Important to take account of Fiscal Risks: • Guarantees • Pension liabilities • Contingent liabilities • PPPs • Provides basis for Long Term Analysis

  18. OTHER FUNCTIONS • Analysis of proposals • Options for spending cuts • Analysis of mandates (regulatory analysis) • Economic analyses • Tax analyses • Long term analysis • Policy briefs

  19. FUNDAMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS • Nonpartisan (not Bipartisan) • Director should be more technical than political • Staff should be entirely technical • Develop an esprit de corps • Independent • Objective • Informed • Serve Both Majority & Minority • Transparent (Everything on the Internet) • Understandable (Subway test)

  20. ADDITIONAL CHARACTERISTICS • Put core functions in law • Do not make recommendations [GAO: audit, with recommendations; CBO: budget, without] • Brief Members first, especially if news is bad • Serve Committees, not Members • Meet with anyone, but be balanced • Be physically separate from legislature • Avoid limelight • Be responsive and timely

  21. US Examples: Distribution of CBO Staff

  22. Staffing by Core Function

  23. CONCLUSIONS • Legislatures need an independent source of information and analysis to improve their participation in budget preparation. • A nonpartisan, independent, objective analytic unit can provide transparent, clear, and accurate information without polarizing relations between executive and legislature. • Successful creation of such a unit is not easy: in particular, it demands balance in a political environment.

More Related