Status of plant protection activities in nepal
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 44

Status of plant protection activities in Nepal PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 82 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Status of plant protection activities in Nepal. Yubak Dhoj G. C., PhD Plant Protection Directorate Department of Agriculture Ministry of Agriculture and Co-operatives Nepal Tel: ++ 977 9841 097 986 [email protected] www.ppdnepal.gov.np.

Download Presentation

Status of plant protection activities in Nepal

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Status of plant protection activities in nepal

Status of plant protection activities in Nepal

Yubak Dhoj G. C., PhD

Plant Protection Directorate

Department of Agriculture

Ministry of Agriculture and Co-operatives

Nepal

Tel: ++ 977 9841 097 986

[email protected]

www.ppdnepal.gov.np

Capacity building in use of the International Phytosanitary Portal (IPP) and APPPC website for information exchange

4-9 July 2011

Sangria-La Hotel

Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia


Status of plant protection activities in nepal

Mount Everest


Status of plant protection activities in nepal

  • Nepal: Sovereign, landlocked, mountainous South Asian country

  • Rich in biodiversity and water resources.

  • Land area of 147,181 Km.

  • Located between

    • North latitude: 26022' to 30027

    • East longitude: 800 4' to 88012'.

  • Population : 27.5 million; Population growth rate: 2.25%

  • 80 percent of economically active labor force

  • 65.6 percent of the total population depends on agriculture

  • Contribution of agriculture to GDP: 32.8% percent

Country at a glance


Status of plant protection activities in nepal

Country : Nepal

Sandwiched between two giant countries of the world: the China (Northern side) and India (in rest of the side)

Agriculture: Major occupation, GDP contribution (more than 42%)

IPM Programme active since : 1997

Estimated number of farmers trained : 69207 (60% Female)

Estimated number of trainers currently active : 1014 (IPM Programme 907 - I/NGO 107)

Main Crop involved : Rice, Vegetable, Potato, Tea and Citrus.


Status of plant protection activities in nepal

Machhapuchre Himal


Status of plant protection activities in nepal

Annapurna Himal


Status of plant protection activities in nepal

National Flower


Map of nepal

Map of Nepal


Status of plant protection activities in nepal

Organisation Chart


Agricultural situation in nepal

Agricultural situation in Nepal


Pesticide use situation

Pesticide use situation

  • 3 pesticide formulators, 50 pesticide dealers, 4000 licensed pesticide retailer in the country

  • Mainly organophosphate, carbamates, synthetic pyrethroides, fungicides, herbicides, rodenticides, botanical pesticides, bio- pesticides and pesticide used in public health.

  • Pesticides not extensively used in Nepal.

  • An average 142g/ha. of pesticides. However, in cotton (2560 g/ha), tea (2100g/ha) and vegetables (1400g/ha) appears excessive and without the consideration of applicators (farmers) and consumers.

  • On the basis of a.i.: 212 ton

  • Worth of: 207.69 million NRs (2.95 million US $)

  • Insecticides (botanicals and public health): 29.82 %

  • Fungicides: 61.12 %

  • Herbicide 7.43 %,

  • Rodeticides: 1.17 %

  • Bio-pesticides: 0.67 %

  • 0.2 % others (Bactericides, Acaricides, Nematicides and rest).


Pesticide import and formulation 2009

Pesticide import and formulation (2009)


Pesticide imported and formulated data

Pesticide imported and formulated data


Pesticide registration data

Pesticide registration data

  • Trade products: 470

  • Technical names: 88

    • Insecticides: 44

    • Fungicides: 24

    • Herbicides: 12

    • Rodenticide -3

    • Bio- pesticides: 4

    • Bacteriacide - 1


Types of pesticide use in nepal

Types of pesticide use in Nepal

  • AIC stopped purchase: 1995 then 6372 retailers registered

  • Almost 289 different types of pesticides-registered

  • Insecticides (173), fungicides (62), herbicides (24), rodenticides (9), botanicals (13) others (13)

  • Insecticides (60%), fungicides (30%) others (10%)

  • Organophosphates (29% in 2007 and 82% in 2003)

  • Biopesticides (less than 0.1%), botanicals (0.01%), bactericides and acaricides (less than 1%)

  • Highest use: tea, cotton, vegetables (brinjal, tomato, legumes), rice,


Summary of date expired pesticides accumulated in nepal

Summary of date expired pesticides accumulated in Nepal


Pesticide policy for the enforcement of pesticide act

Pesticide policy for the enforcement of pesticide act

  • Pesticide act (1991) and pesticide rules (1993) effective since 16 July 1994

  • Pesticides are registered and regulated under the pesticide act and rules

  • Act regulates the imports, production, sale, distribution, marketing and use of pesticides for management and preventing pesticide risk

  • Under the pesticide act 1991, a Pesticides Board is functional comprising various Ministries, pesticide association, scientists and consumers group

  • Major tasks: implementation of national and international rules and regulations


Pesticide under who classification

Pesticide under WHO classification


Banned pesticide

Banned pesticide

Phorate and Methomyl are in the process of banning

Methyl bromide: 2015 for strictly for quarantine purpose

Stock of obsolete pesticide

Obsolete pesticide is 74.265 mt + 43 cylinder of methyl bromide (50 kg) stored in warehouse at 24 locations of the country


Status of plant protection activities in nepal

Table 1. Trends and value of pesticide import


Pesticides board committee

Pesticides Board/Committee

Mandated to:

  • Advise Nepal government in the formulation of national policy regarding pesticide,

  • Maintain coordination between private and government sectors in the production and distribution of pesticides,

  • Rational encouragement of the private sectors to invest in the industry,

  • Regulate or control the quality of produce by the industry operated by private/government sectors, and

  • Establish standard for pesticide

  • Under the board, 2 sub- committee:

    • Technical sub- committee (with 7 member)

    • Legal sub- committee (with 3 member)


The pesticide registration and management division

The Pesticide Registration and Management Division

  • Established in 1994 under the act

  • To operate the pesticide registration and management activities.

Duties of PRMD:

  • Register pesticides and issue certificate upon receiving application

  • Ascertain the criteria for rational and appropriate use of pesticides


Pesticide registration

Pesticide Registration

Pesticide registration procedures

  • Registration is required for each formulation and even brand of a single technical compound.

  • The pesticides are registered in the name of Trade Product for 5 years with or with out provision/ condition.

  • Application form for registration of pesticides with NRs.5 ticket.

  • Pesticide registration fee RS. 1000/-

  • Letter of Authorization from the Manufacture/Formulator Company.

  • A statement of the need to use in Nepal

  • Summary of intended use pattern

  • Ecotoxicological data

  • Efficacy data

  • Residue analysis data

  • Copies of at least one foreign registration certificate (evidence that the product is registered overseas)

  • Three copies of the original label

  • Approved labels

  • Leaflets in Nepali language - for importers

  • Labels and leaflets in Nepali Language - for domestic formulators.

  • For research no attachments are necessary


Licensing mechanism

Licensing Mechanism

  • The licensing controls from un-authorized handling

  • Implemented under Pesticide Act 1991 and Pesticide Rule 1993(1st amendment in 2006).

  • formulators, distributors, sellers or users shall obtain a license from the Pesticide Board

  • No person may manufacture, import, supply or retail the registered Pesticides unless he/she in possession of a valid license

Government Policy & Legislation

  • The national conservation strategy (1998)

  • Nepal Environment Policy and Action Plan (NEPAP) endorsed in 1993

  • The National Environmental Guideline (1993)

  • The Environment Protection Act (EPA) 1996

  • Pesticide Act, 1991 and Regulation 1993 with 1st amendment in 2006


Steps towards the reduced use of chemical pesticides

Steps towards the reduced use of chemical pesticides

  • Promotion of user and environment friendly formulation of pesticides

  • Adoption of IPM approach in the pest management

  • Promotion of bio-pesticides and botanical pesticides

  • Banning of pesticides (such as extremely hazardous group, POPs pesticides, and PIC listed pesticides)

  • Proper disposal of obsolete pesticides accumulated in the country


Policy level issues

Policy level issues

  • Inadequate legal and regulatory frames work

  • Inadequate guidelines and formal policy

  • Ineffective control and monitoring mechanism

  • Inefficient transfer of technology and poor information dissemination

  • Transboundary issues due to the long, open and porous border with India

  • Lack of government laboratory facilities for residue and toxicological analysis

  • Dealers/retailers take up intensive and aggressive marketing strategies

  • Lack of biorational and biopesticides as alternatives for pest control to chemical pesticides

  • conventional and expensive formulations methods

  • Lack of awareness about pesticide dose, method of use, waiting period, pesticide hazards to mankind and environment etc.

  • Farmer's addiction to chemical pesticide use


National ipm program and outcomes

National IPM Program and outcomes


First phase of ipm

First phase of IPM

Began: 2003: In support of Gov of Norway

Outcomes: Trained human resources (technicians and farmers)

Support to program initiatives

Created awareness among farmers, principles and method of IPM

IPM based on field studies, crop productivity (rice and vegetables)

Institutionalization and mainstreaming of IPM to regular program of Government, NGos

The first phase has forged the roadmap to second phase of IPM


Second phase of ipm

Second phase of IPM

Began: January 2008 – Dec 2012 in support of Gov of Norway

Objectives: consolidatation, intensification and institutionalization of the outcomes of first phase of IPM,

Up scale IPM to all 75 districts

Theme is not just about pest control

Holistic and sustainable management production management

Food security, reduce poverty and safe gourd environment

Major focus: Developing and spreading successful IPM technologies

Increase agriculture production, promote marketing to IPM crop products

Far beyond the class room of the institutions and researches


Status of plant protection activities in nepal

Achievements of IPM Programme

  • Farmers trained : 72957 (60% Female)

  • Trainers currently active : 1149 IPM Programme (1042 - I/NGO 107)

  • Farmer Field School (FFS) implemented : 1010

  • FFS in Rice in Rice : 661

  • FFS in Vegetable : 649

  • Good understanding among farmers on ecology based crop production.

    Some Impacts of IPM Programme

  • Reduction in pesticide use by 40% in FFS areas.

  • Increase in crop yield from 15 – 25% in rice and 32-48% in vegetable as compared to farmers’ adopted practice.

  • Gradual increase in bio and botanical pesticides.


Gender mainstreaming

Gender Mainstreaming

Male and Female participation in rice FFS


Status of plant protection activities in nepal

Male and Female participation in vegetable FFS


Social inclusion

Social Inclusion


Other visible impacts

Other Visible Impacts

Ecosystem Understanding

Reduction in use of Hazardous pesticide: Use ofpesticides reduced by 40% in all most all program areas. The number of non-users increased and the type and frequency of pesticide application by users reduced after FFS. Desirable behavioral changes observed in the farmers attitude towards calendar spraying. Trend of using botanical pesticides based on local plant resources increased significantly.

Health and Environment : Over 80% of the IPM farmers agreed to a better health condition and think that their doctor visit and medicine cost reduced. Around 85% of the farmers who participated in FFS felt changes in the environment, i.e. eco-friendly pest management made possible beekeeping, rice field fishery.

Food Security - Average income of the farmers improved in program areas due to increase in yield following IPM practice. In the FFS areas 15-25% yield increase was recorded in rice and 32.7-48.3% in vegetables.


Status of plant protection activities in nepal

Awareness and Peace building -Exposure of politicians or officials to FFS in action or to alumni group activities has created a keen interest in IPM-FFS activities. In particular, it was noted that the FFS were able to bring together different social groups and political orientations in a common programme. This aspect of IPM-FFS is highly relevant and appreciated in the social and political context of Nepal.

Linkage, Coordination and Collaboration - Farmers and local government have shown higher enthusiasm in IPM program. Involvement of NGO/INGO ( such as World Education, CARITAS, MADE/Nepal, WINROCK International, Helvetas/Nepal) increased significantly over the years. IPM Coordination activities are regularized in the regular activities of Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives and funding for FFS from local recourses has also been increased.


Government commitment

Government commitment

  • Nepal signatory country of International Conventions related to pesticide

  • Stockholm Convention,

  • Basel Convention,

  • Rotterdam Convention

  • Montreal Protocol (MOEST 2008)

  • As a commitment and an obligation to these global treaties Government of Nepal has banned an import and use of POPs

  • DDT, aldrin, dieldrin, endrin, chlordane, heptachlor, toxaphene, mirex). Recently GON banned some other pesticides as methyl parthion and monocrotophos that are under extremely hazardous (Ia) and highly hazardous (Ib) WHO/FAO toxicity category.

  • Highly hazardous pesticides such as phorate (Ia), acephate (Ib), dichlorvos (Ib), methomyl (Ib), triazophos (Ib), zinc phosphide (Ib) and endosulfan (IIa) of the organochlorine group are still in use.

  • However, GON has restricted the use of ethion, methomyl and phorate in tea plantation (PRMD 2004) that will facilitate the import of tea in EU countries.


Issues challenges and area of improvement

Issues, challenges and area of improvement

Pesticide misuse;

  • Unnecessary use

  • Improper selection

  • Highly toxic/broad spectrum pesticide

  • Overdose and frequency

  • For killing fishes

  • Storing along with food grains and stuffs

  • Dipping of vegetables

  • No care of waiting periods

  • Throwing of empty container

  • Use of date expired pesticides


Issues challenges and area of improvement1

Issues, challenges and area of improvement

  • Treatment of pesticide like medicine

  • Residue problem

  • Illegal trans boundary movement

  • Low public awareness

  • Adulterated products

  • Disposal of obsolete pesticides

  • Alternatives to pesticides

  • Cumbersome process of bio pesticides registration

  • No institutions to certify IPM products

  • Weak regulatory and poor monitoring system

  • Poor coordination among stakeholders

  • Low enforcement of Act and Pesticide Regulations

  • Lack of experts in pesticide toxicology


Status of plant protection activities in nepal

  • About 75 metric tones of obsolete pesticides stored in different places are

    awaiting for disposal.

  • Nepal appreciates technical support from APPPC and other Regional

    International agencies for strengthening its capacity in plant protection services.


Problems associated with pesticides

Problems associated with pesticides

  • Environment pollution

    Air pollution

    Water pollution

    Soil pollution

  • On public health

  • On wildlife and fishes

  • On natural enemies

  • Residues problem

  • Pest resistance problem

  • Pest resurgence (pest flair-back)

  • Secondary pest outbreaks

  • Incidental loss (deliberately intake)


Future strategies of directorate

Future strategies of Directorate

  • Pesticide monitoring system while import, formulation, storage, sale and disposal

  • Deregistering of highly toxic pesticides (extremely hazardous) IA and IB of WHO classification

  • Promotion of Bio-pesticides/Bio-control agents

  • Promotion of IPM and other alternative pest management strategies

  • Establishment of central, regional as well as community level laboratories for quality, residue and toxicology analysis

  • Capacity building of pesticide importers, resellers and farmers

  • Promotion of environment friendly formulation

  • Strategies for first in first out policy (minimise pesticide being as obsolete)

  • Disposal of the obsolete pesticides


Awareness program

Awareness program

  • Hording boards, Pamphlets, TV, Radio/FM

  • Street drama, Study materials (Leaflets, Posters, CDs)

  • Trainings (farmers, medium level technicians, officer level)

  • Workshop, seminars, talk program

  • Curriculum amendments

  • Natural enemies and biorearing

  • Observation visits

  • Exposure tours, Mobile plant clinic, Occasional campaign

  • Establishment of central laboratories at PPD

  • National pesticide residue monitoring lab (PMRS)

  • Monitoring of pesticides and pesticides on plant samples

  • Food residue monitoring (may be through DFTQC)

  • Strengthening of RPPLs

  • Capacity building (Chromatography)


  • Login