1 / 31

Front End Capture/Phase Rotation & Cooling Studies

Front End Capture/Phase Rotation & Cooling Studies. David Neuffer Cary Yoshikawa December 2008. 0utline. Introduction ν -Factory Front end Capture and Φ -E rotation High Frequency buncher/rotation Study 2B ν -Factory Shorter version ν -Factory → μ + - μ - Collider Discussion.

deanna
Download Presentation

Front End Capture/Phase Rotation & Cooling Studies

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Front EndCapture/Phase Rotation& Cooling Studies David Neuffer Cary Yoshikawa December 2008

  2. 0utline • Introduction • ν-Factory Front end • Capture and Φ-E rotation • High Frequencybuncher/rotation • Study 2B ν-Factory • Shorter version • ν-Factory→μ+-μ- Collider • Discussion

  3. Variations tried … • Study 2A – ISS baseline • Shorter bunch train example • nB= 10 • Better for Collider; as good for ν-Factory • ICOOL/G4Beamline simulations • Study of “accepted” particles • Rf cavities in solenoids? • Use “magnetic insulation” ASOL lattice • Not too bad • Variations • Higher energy capture ??

  4. Study2B June 2004 scenario (ISS) • Drift –110.7m • Bunch -51m • (1/) =0.008 • 12 rf freq., 110MV • 330 MHz  230MHz • -E Rotate – 54m –(416MV total) • 15 rf freq. 230 202 MHz • P1=280 , P2=154NV = 18.032 • Match and cool (80m) • 0.75 m cells, 0.02m LiH • Captures both μ+ and μ- • ~0.2μ/(24 GeV p)

  5. Study 2B ICOOL simulation (NB=18) 500MeV/c s = 1m s=109m Drift 0 500MeV/c s= 216m s=166m Bunch Rotate 0 60 -40

  6. Features/Flaws of Study 2B Front End • Fairly long system ~300m long (217 in B/R) • Produces long trains of ~200 MHz bunches • ~80m long (~50 bunches) • Transverse cooling is ~2½ in x and y, no longitudinal cooling • Initial Cooling is relatively weak ? - • Requires rf within magnetic fields • in current lattice, rf design; 12 MV/m at B = ~2T, 200MHz • MTA/MICE experiments to determine if practical • For Collider (Palmer) • Select peak 21 bunches • Recombine after cooling • ~1/2 lost 500 MeV/c -40 60m

  7. Shorter Bunch train example • Reduce drift, buncher, rotator to get shorter bunch train: • 217m ⇒ 125m • 57m drift, 31m buncher, 36m rotator • Rf voltages up to 15MV/m (×2/3) • Obtains ~0.26 μ/p24 in ref. acceptance • Slightly better ? • ~0.24 μ/p for Study 2B baseline • 80+ m bunchtrain reduced to < 50m • Δn: 18 -> 10 500MeV/c -30 40m

  8. Further iteration/optimization • Match to 201.25 MHz cooling channel • Reoptimize phase, frequency • f = 201.25 MHz, φ = 30º, • Obtain shorter bunch train • Choose ~best 12 bunches • ~ 21 bunch train for Collider at NB= 18 case ~12 bunches (~18m) • ~0.2 μ/pref in best 12 bunches • Densest bunches are ~twice as dense as NB = 18 case

  9. Details of ICOOL model (NB=10) • Drift– 56.4m • B=2T • Bunch- 31.5m • Pref,1=280MeV/c, Pref,2 =154 MeV/c, nrf = 10 • Vrf 0 to 15MV/m (0.5m rf, 0.25m drift) cells • 360 MHz  240MHz • -E Rotate – 36m – • Vrf = 15MV/m (0.5m rf, 0.25m drift) cells • NV = 10.07 (240 -> 201.5 MHz) • Match and cool (80m) • Old ICOOL transverse match to ASOL (should redo) • Pref= 220MeV/c, frf = 201.25 MHz • 0.75 m cells, 0.02m LiH, 0.5m rf, 16.00MV/m, φrf =30° • Better cooling possible (H2, stronger focussing)

  10. Simulations (NB=10) s = 1m s = 89m Drift and Bunch Rotate 500 MeV/c s = 219m s = 125m Cool 0 30m -30m

  11. Front end simulations • Initial beam is 8GeV protons, 1ns bunch length

  12. Comparisons of ICOOL and G4BL • Simulations of front end and cooling agree • ICOOL and G4Beamline results can be matched • Buncher – rotator – cooler sequence can be developed in both codes • Method Captures both μ+ and μ- • But some differences • dE/dx is larger in ICOOL • Phasing of rf cavities uses different model

  13. 50 cm 201.25 MHz RF cavity 1 cm LiH 75 cm cell 23 cm vacuum Rotator 36 m long “Cool and Match” 3 m (4x75 cm cells) “Cool” 90 m of 75 cm cells MC Front End Layout in G4beamline 12.9 m 43.5 m 31.5 m 36 m rotator capture drift buncher

  14. Rotator End G4Beamline ICOOL Pi+/Mu+ Pi-/Mu-

  15. Cool End G4Beamline ICOOL Pi+/Mu+ Pi-/Mu-

  16. Initial example had different rf frequency for each cavity Buncher- 42 cavities -31.5m 360to 240 MHz Rotator- 48 cavities -36m 240 to 202 MHz Reduce # by 1/3 14 in buncher; 16 in rotator Nearly as good capture (<5%less) Similar to study 2B discreteness Reduce by 1/6 7 in buncher, 8 in rotator Significantly worse (~20%) Reduce number of independent frequencies

  17. Accepted particles • Accepted particles fit final beam cuts: • AX + Ay < 0.03m • AL < 0.2m • Initial beam has momenta from ~75 to ~600 MeV/c • Final beam is ~200 to 300 MeV/c • Transverse emittance is cooled from ~0.014 to ~0.0036 600 MeV/c 0 MeV/c 600MeV/c 0 MeV/c

  18. Accepted Longitudinal distros 600 MeV/c 135m 196m 0 MeV/c 600 MeV/c 1m 135m 196m 0 MeV/c 40m -30m

  19. “Accepted” Beam properties • For study 2A acceptance means several cuts: • AX + Ay < 0.03m • AL < 0.2m • For beam within acceptances, • εt, N,rms = 0.0036m (from ~0.007) • εL, N,rms = ~0.04m (from ~0.09) • Emittances are much smaller than the full-beam emittances … • xrms = 6cm (all-beam) • xrms = 3.6cm (accepted-beam) +30cm -30cm -30cm +30cm

  20. Variations - focusing • Buncher and Rotator have rf within 2T fields • Field too strong for rf field ?? • Axial field within “pill-box” cavities • Solutions ?? • Open-cell cavities ?? • “magnetically insulated” cavities • Alternating Solenoid lattice is approximately magnetically insulated • Use ASOL throughout buncher/rotator/cooler • Use gas-filled rf cavities ASOL lattice

  21. Study 2A ASOL Bmax= 2.8T, β*=0.7m, Pmin= 81MeV/c 2T for initial drift Low energy beam is lost (P < 100MeV/c) Bunch train is truncated OK for collider Also tried weaker focusing ASOL Bmax= 1.83T, β*=1.1m, Pmax = 54 MeV/c 1.33 T for initial drift Match scaled from 2A match Use ASOL lattice rather than 2T + - B(z)

  22. 2T -> ASOL

  23. ASOL-1.33T 56m 62m 193m 133m

  24. Simulation results 2.8T ASOL 0.18 μ/24 GeV p 0.059 μ/8 GeV p Cools to 0.0075m 1.8T ASOL 0.198 μ/24 GeV p 0.064 μ/8 GeV p ~10% more than stronger focussing Cools to 0.0085m Baseline (2T -> ASOL) had ~0.25 μ/24 GeV p ~0.08 μ/8 GeV p Weaker-focusing ASOL has ~10% better acceptance than 2.8T lattice Longer bunch train First ASOL results

  25. Variant-capture at 0.28 GeV/c 1.0GeV/c 2T → 2.8T ASOL s=59m s=66m 0.0 1.0GeV/c 1.0GeV/c s=200m s=126m 0.0 -30m +40m -30m +40m

  26. Capture at 280 MeV/c • Captures more muons than 220 MeV/c • For 2.T -> 2.8T lattice • But in larger phase space area • Less cooling for given dE/ds Δs • Better for collider • Shorter, more dense bunch train • If followed by longitudinal cooling 280 MeV/c 220 MeV/c

  27. Higher energy capture improves capture for high-field lattice Cooling is slower Not as good for low-field lattice Weaker focusing reduces cooling For High field lattice: 2.8T ASOL 8GeV beam 0.065 μ/p in εt <0.03, εL <0.2 0.093 μ/p in εt <0.045, εL <0.3 24 GeV beam 0.19 μ/p in εt <0.03, εL <0.2 0.26 μ/p in εt <0.045, εL <0.3 For Low-field lattice 1.8T ASOL 8GeV beam 0.053 μ/p in εt <0.03, εL <0.2 0.083 μ/p in εt <0.045, εL <0.3 cools only to ~0.010m Higher-Energy Simulation results

  28. Discussion • High frequency phase-energy rotation + cooling has been explored • Shorter system better for Collider • Shorter bunch train; denser bunches • “magnetic insulated” lattice could be used rather than B = 2 or 1.75 T lattice • Slightly worse performance (?) • ~10 to 20% worse for neutrino factory • Ok for Collider • Particles lost are at end of bunch train

  29. Any Questions?

  30. Project X Status

  31. High-frequency Buncher and φ-E Rotator • Form bunches first • Φ-E rotate bunches

More Related