1 / 15

Top Ilya

Top Ilya. Outline Top Physics Top Working Group Group convener Group resources List of mayor institutions in the group Overview of the main analyses List of ongoing analyses & 2005 ATL notes Jet calibration Top mass measurement

deana
Download Presentation

Top Ilya

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Top Ilya • Outline • Top Physics • Top Working Group • Group convener • Group resources • List of mayor institutions in the group • Overview of the main analyses • List of ongoing analyses & 2005 ATL notes • Jet calibration • Top mass measurement • Top WG studies during the detector commissioning with the first collisions • Group goals for 2006 • Summary

  2. Top WG • http://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/TPHYSICS/tphysics.html • 1-2 WG meetings per month • ~ 20-30 people currently involved in the analyses, • the number grows up rapidly • Conveners: • Dominique PallinUniversite Blaise Pascal de Clermond FerrondCERN office: 40-R-C06, tel: 71128 • Stan BentvelsenNIKHEF, Kruislaan 409, 1098 SJ, AmsterdamCERN office: 40-2-D06, tel: 71157 • List of main institutions in the group: • NIKHEF (Amsterdam), SACLAY • Centre de Physique des Particules de Marseille • Universite Blaise Pascal de Clermond Ferrand • U.of Alberta, DAPNIA, U.Udine, LIP

  3. Top quark exists and will be produced abundantly. • Top production cross section approximately 100x Tevatron • In SM: top- and W-mass constrain Higgs mass • Sensitivity through radiative corrections • Scrutinize SM by precise determination top mass • Beyond SM: New Physics? • Many heavy particles decay in tt Handle on new physics by detailed properties of top • Experiment: Top quark useful to calibrate the detector • Beyond Top: Top quarks will be a major source of background for almost every search for physics beyond the SM • Top mass determination • Commissioning phase • Top properties • Single top production Top Physics at ATLAS

  4. Top WG analysis list Ongoing Analyses • Jet Calibration and Top mass reconstruction(Clermont+Alberta) • Top mass reconstruction (DAPNIA) • Commissioning with tt and single top events(NIKHEF) • Single top (s-channel and t-channel) (Grenoble) • Single top trigger studies (MSU) • Single top (Wt channel) and tt cross section (Udine+Tufts+Pisa) • Single top (Wg channel) (Carleton) • Top spin polarization and W polarization (CPPM+Prague) • FCNC in top decays (tt and single top), Asymmetries (LIP+RHUL) Analyses done in 2005 (ATL notes) • Top quark mass measurement in the lepton plus jets channel using full simulationATL-COM-PHYS-2005-059 • Top studies for the Atlas detector commissioningATL-COM-PHYS-2005-039 • ATLAS sensitivity to top quark and W boson polarization in ttbar eventsSN-ATLAS-2005-052 • Study of ATLAS sensitivity to FCNC top decays ATL-COM-PHYS-2005-023 • Top quark mass measurement in the lepton plus jets channel using full simulation ATL-COM-PHYS-2005-020 • Measurement of the W polarization in top decays with semileptonic ttbar events ATL-COM-PHYS-2005-015

  5. j1 n W1 W2 l(e,m) j2 t1 t2 b1 b2 Light jet energy scale determination with Top events Motivation • The absolute energie scale will be known at the level of few percent at LHC start • The calibration function varies with E and  • => Get the light jet energy scale such that E jet  E parton AOD Cone 04 Calibration function  (Ejet) = Eparton / Ejet An example: Rome AOD  (Ejet) = 1. to 1.1, ‘cone 04’ Method • Use the well defined W mass to rescale the jet energies from the W decay Wj1 j2 such that MW=MWPDG • Dont use any hypothesis for the calibration function • Dont rely on MC • Select an enriched W sample from ttbar sample

  6. Preliminary result with 1000 W +bkg evts • Calibration marginaly sensible to BKG (purity=85%) EPart / E preliminary To reach the 1% precision on the E scale, 10000 Ws should be enough = 1month data taking Studies of systematic errors do take place after the Rome workshop. E • Three methods were investigated to get in-situ light jet calibration for Top mass measurement • Preliminary results from AOD • AOD and ATLFAST comparable for top studies • 1% precision on the jet scale seems achievable in 1-2 month of data taking at 1033 • Top in-situ Light jet scale seems usable for all jets (if calibration is done for jets with same selection, checked on gamma+jet sample) • Future • Run on all AOD files + physical BKG • Detailed look into jet algorithms

  7. Lepton side Hadron side Golden-plated: MTop from lepton+jet • Golden channel • Clean trigger from isolated lepton • The reconstruction starts with the W mass: • different ways to pair the right jets to form the W • jet energies calibrated using mW • Important to tag the b-jets: • enormously reduces background (physics and combinatorial) • clean up the reconstruction Br(ttbbjjl)=30%for electron + muon • Typical selection efficiency: ~5-10%: • Isolated lepton PT>20 GeV • ETmiss>20 GeV • 4 jets with ET>40 GeV • >1 b-jet (b40%, uds10-3, c10-2) Background: <2% W/Z+jets, WW/ZZ/WZ

  8. j2 j1 b-jet t Lepton + jet: reconstruct top • Hadronic side • W from jet pair with closest invariant mass to MW • Require |MW-Mjj|<20 GeV • Assign a b-jet to the W to reconstruct Mtop • Kinematic fit • Using remaining l+b-jet, the leptonic part is reconstructed • |mlb -<mjjb>| < 35 GeV • Kinematic fit to the tt hypothesis, using MW constraints • Selection efficiency 5-10% • Method works: • Linear with input Mtop • Largely independent on Top PT • Biggest uncertainties: • Jet energy calibration • FSR: ‘out of cone’ give large variations in mass • B-fragmentation • Verified with detailed detector simulation and realistic calibration Challenge: determine the mass of the top with around 1 GeV accuracy on 10 fb^-1

  9. Consequences from Mtop Thanks to M.Grunewald • Assuming total uncertainty on W-mass of 15 MeV • Combined LHC prospect • Very challenging measurement! • Repeat the Electro-Weak fit changing the uncertainties: • Mtop=1 GeV • MW =15 MeV • Same central values • SM constraints on MHiggs: • Summer 2003 values: direct EXCLUDED (mH/mH  32%) (mH/mH  53%) Chances to rule out SM

  10. Top while Commissioning the detectors • Determination MTop in initial phase • Use ‘Golden plated’ lepton+jet • Selection: • Isolated lepton with PT>20 GeV • Exactly 4 jets (R=0.4) with PT>40 GeV • Reconstruction: • Select 3 jets with maximal resulting PT Calibrating detector in comissioning phase Assume pessimistic scenario: -) No b-tagging -) No jet calibration -) But: Good lepton identification No background included • Signal can be improved by kinematic constrained fit • Assuming MW1=MW2 and MT1=MT2

  11. While Commissioning the detectors • Most important background for top: W+4 jets • Leptonic decay of W, with 4 extra ‘light’ jets • Alpgen, Monte Carlo has ‘hard’ matrix element for 4 extra jets(not available in Pythia/Herwig) ALPGEN: W+4 extra light jets Jet: PT>10, ||<2.5, R>0.4 No lepton cuts Effective : ~2400 pb L = 150 pb-1 With extreme simple selection and reconstruction the top-peak should be visible at LHC measure top mass (to 5-7 GeV) give feedback on detector performance

  12. What we can provide • Top enriched samples • Estimate of a light jet energy scale • Estimate of the b-tagging efficiency • Estimate of missing energy • using Tevatron top mass • Determine of Mtop and σtop • Any hope for single top? Inputs • Single lepton trigger efficiency • Lepton identification efficiency • Integrated luminosity • At startup around 10-20%. • Ultimate precision < 5% • Eventually: • B-tagging efficiency • Jet scales ToDo list (among others): - Complete background - Full trigger information - Apply JES corrections - Influence jet algorithms - Repeat study with realistic alignment and condition simulation (DC3) Summary: Understand the interplay between using the top signal as tool to improve the understanding of the detector (b-tagging, jet E scale, ID, etc..) and top precision measurements

  13. Top topics vs. more data • Top mass while commissioning the detectors -> feedback on the performance • Light jet absolute scale calibration With ttbar sample of w->jj • Sample of 10 fb-1 and more: • Top properties precision measurements • Top cross section and mass • Top spin correlations • Top charge determination • Decay modes, … • Single top measurements • Cross sections • Vtb matrix element • Exotics involving top • Ttbar resonances • SuSy in top vertex • FCNC, …

  14. Top WG 2006 • Produce a paper on top physics with 100pb-1 and 10fb-1 • Estimates of luminosity in 2007/2008 • Time schedule: end of 2006 • Draft for one of first ATLAS publications with “real” data • Topics to settle • Trigger • What calibration samples and tools are required? • Analysis tools • Background checks using data • Simulate with as built (realistic) detector • An estimate of top cross section is candidate for “top three of first papers” of Atlas • Ratio of cross sections? For example: σ(tt)/σ(W-production)?

  15. Summary • Top WG studies were very well organized last few years. • The WG has, at the moment, ~30 active members and this number grows. • The Top physics topics are not many but are certain. • The strategy to follow the luminosity build-up is defined. • W->jj calibration is nicely advanced to the systematic studies. • Top mass measurement was studied under different assumptions on the detector readiness. • The group has rather well defined plan for the next two years: • Concentrate on the analyses that require 10 inv fb or less • Study triggers • Define calibration samples and tools. • Background checks using data • Simulate with as built (realistic) detector • The group aims to make one out of “top three of first papers” of Atlas

More Related